similar to: [LLVMdev] Your LLVM email

On 28.02.2011, at 15:44, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 02/28/2011 05:27 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: >> Hi everyone >> >> I am teaching a lecture on hardware/software codesign which, though not a dedicated compiler course, covers quite a bit of compiler related contents (general introduction, intermediate code, code generation). >> >> I'm currently considering

Why aren't polly.merge and entry in the same color region in the attached file? What I'm looking to do is match up a control flow to it's end merge point. This is simple to do based on preds providing each block is in an independent path; however, this is not always the case. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I add also the output of these commands: [hades at artemis examples]$ ./compile_ex.sh super_simple_loop Printing analysis 'Polly - Detect Scops in functions' for function 'main': [hades at artemis examples]$ modifying it in : #include <stdio.h> int main() { int A[1024]; int j, k=10; for (j = 0; j < 1024; j++) A[j] = k;

On 10/07/2011 03:43 PM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > 2011/10/7 Marcello Maggioni<hayarms at gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> for example this loop: >> >> #include<stdio.h> >> >> int main() >> { >> int A[1024]; >> int j, k=10; >> for (j = 1; j< 1024; j++) >> A[j] =

Hi, It's changed a few times over the last year. I believe xdg-open spawns whichever application your desktop environment would use to open the file so you should be able to tell it to use dotty. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev Sent: 11 August 2015 00:30 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] Fwd: [LLVMdev]

Hi Tobias, thanks for the answer. I'll try to give a look to the code you pointed me to , and I'll try to make the modification myself. I'm new to LLVM and Polly, but the code of both seem clean and understandable, so I hope to be able to do it myself. In case I'll ask here for support :) Marcello 2011/10/1 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>: > On 10/01/2011 03:26

I guess even kaleidoscope would serve as a good tutorial -sanjiv On 24 May 2011 17:23, "Tobias Grosser" <grosser at fim.uni-passau.de> wrote: > > On 05/24/2011 05:18 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > > > > On 28.02.2011, at 15:44, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > > >> On 02/28/2011 05:27 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > >>> Hi everyone >

Hi, I have a system of ODE's I can solve with lsoda. Model=function(t,x,parms) { #parameter definitions lambda=parms[1]; beta=parms[2]; d = parms[3]; delta = parms[4]; p=parms[5]; c=parms[6] xdot[1] = lambda - (d*x[1])- (beta*x[3]*x[1]) xdot[2] = (beta*x[3]*x[1]) - (delta*x[2]) xdot[3] = (p*x[2]) - (c*x[3]) return(list(xdot)) } I want

Hi, I started to work with llvm and liked the CFG dotty printer a lot. However there was none for the dominance trees. I implemented dotty printing for dominance trees and introduced these new flags: -dot-dom : Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file -dot-dom-only : Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file (with no function

I just joined the LLVM Dev list. What is the status of the PTX BE? thank, Vince Schuster

Hello all, I have been taking basic steps with DTrace and subscribed today to this list. I have written a simple DTrace script to trace all the function entry/exit from a given function: #pragma D option flowindent pid$1::*mysql_select*:entry { self -> start = vtimestamp ; } pid$1::*mysql_select*:return /self -> start/ { self -> start =0 ; } pid$1:::entry, pid$1:::return

On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 00:20 +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Hi, > > I started to work with llvm and liked the CFG dotty printer a lot. > However there was none for the dominance trees. > > I implemented dotty printing for dominance trees And here is the patch. Tobi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Hi, I'm running ubuntu 12.04 and I'm trying to use dotty, the graphs are produced but without data - there are just dots in the nodes instead of text. Does anyone else have any trouble? Cheers, sam -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/broken-dotty-tp46278.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello R-users and developers, This is the announce of a new Eclipse plugin for R. It is in its "early" (alpha) stage. It's GPL, source code is provided with the plugin. The update site is ready for install with eclipse 3.1 at : http://www.alysis.de/Rsubmit/update/ If you're interested, please read the feature list below or go to http://www.alysis.de/Rsubmit/ Thanks,

Dear All, As a maintainer of large, complex packages, I can think of many places in which deconstructing assignment would simplify the code, as well as facilitate readability by breaking up larger functions into helpers, so I would be very glad to see this incorporated somehow. I think the crux of the matter is that while there is a number of ways to implement deconstructing assignment within R,

Yes, this is really a problem with the checks, not with the language. A simpler approach than your alternativeAssignment function would be simply to allow globalVariables() to be limited to a single function as the note in its help page says. This might be tedious to write by hand, but could be automated using methods like "dotify" in dotty. Duncan Murdoch On 12/03/2023 10:36

Thanks Gabriel and Kevin for your inputs, regarding your points Gabriel, I think Python and Julia do allow multiple sub-assignment, but in-line with my earlier suggestion in response to Duncan to make multiple assignment an environment-level operation (like collapse::%=% currently works), this would not be possible in R. Regarding the [a] <- coolest_function() syntax, yeah it would mean do

On 15/08/11 13:12, محمد ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻫﻠﻮﻯ wrote: > How do I enable the assertions when building ? > I am using 2.9, the current version, and when I use the standard build llc does > not give me the view-*-dags options. Configure with --enable-assertions Ciao, Duncan. > > -Omer > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at

On 12/03/2023 6:07 a.m., Sebastian Martin Krantz wrote: > Thinking more about this, and seeing Kevins examples at > https://github.com/kevinushey/dotty > <https://github.com/kevinushey/dotty>, I think this is the most R-like > way of doing it, > with an additional benefit as it would allow to introduce the useful > data.table semantics DT[, .(a = b, c, d)] to more

Kevins package is very nice as a proof of concept, no doubt about that, but it is not at the level of performance or convenience that a native R implementation would offer. I would probably not use it to translate matlab routines into R packages placed on CRAN, because it?s an additional dependency, I have a performance burden in every iteration, and utils::globalVariables() is everything but