similar to: [LLVMdev] Error building Clang?

Did you 'svn up' on both your llvm and clang checkouts? Yea, what Ben said.. Ben, Does 'make up' update the test-suite/compiler-rt as well? Chad On Feb 13, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Ryan Taylor wrote: > llvm[4]: Compiling CGExprConstant.cpp for Release+Asserts build > CGExprConstant.cpp:814:53: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 2, have 3 > return

All, Is there any particular reason we don't use cl::ZeroOrMore more pervasively with the cl::opt class of command-line options? 1. Some of llvm's optimizations are enabled/disabled by llvm command-line options. Passing these options to our build system via CFF and CXXF result in redundant CL options. If the CL option is a cl::opt which defaults to cl::Optional, a warning is emitted.

Hello, The documentation for debug information (http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html) says the structure of block descriptors metadata is: !3 = metadata !{ i32, ;; Tag = 11 + LLVMDebugVersion (DW_TAG_lexical_block) metadata,;; Reference to context descriptor i32, ;; Line number i32 ;; Column number } However, looking at the generated metadata, there are 2 extra

Thanks alot Chad for quick response. Does this means that, we can not use LLVM optimizations except O1, O2, O3, O4 and unroll-loops with clang? One more thing I would like to know that If I want to process multiple modules with opt at the same time like opt -adce *.bc then how is it possible with opt in one go, if I process all the bytecode files within Makefile. Thanks. Shahzad On Thu, Jun

Hi Shahzad, > Is it possible that we can use LLVM optimization beside O1, O2, O3 > along with dragonegg plugin? sure, try this: gcc -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so ...other_options_here... -S -o - -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-ir-optimize=0 | opt -pass1 -pass2 ... Here -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir tells it to output LLVM IR rather than target assembler.

Hi Shahzad, > I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to > produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is > producing an error > > $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c > -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce this won't work because you aren't passing the IR to opt (you need -o - for that if using a pipe) and you

I would like to transform X/Y -> X*1/Y. Specifically, I would like to convert: define void @t1a(double %a, double %b, double %d) { entry: %div = fdiv fast double %a, %d %div1 = fdiv fast double %b, %d %call = tail call i32 @foo(double %div, double %div1) ret void } to: define void @t1b(double %a, double %b, double %d) { entry: %div = fdiv fast double 1.000000e+00, %d %mul = fmul

Hi, > I tried it with -o - but its producing an error > > gcc: fatal error: cannot specify -o with -c, -S or -E with multiple files > > What you suggest? what I wrote: >> for F in *.c ; do B=`basename $F .c` ; gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so >> -S -o - $F -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce -o $B.ll ; done >> clang *.ll Thanks to the for loop and

Hello Duncan Is it possible that we can use LLVM optimization beside O1, O2, O3 along with dragonegg plugin? Regards Shahzad On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Abdul Wahid Memon <engrwahidmemon at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks alot Chad for these quick and fine responses. > > Regards > > Abdul > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com>

On 7/9/2012 1:42 PM, Chad Rosier wrote: > Have you looked here: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html > > Chad > > > On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:33 AM, NY Knicks Fan wrote: > >> I'm trying to do the tutorials at: >> >> https://github.com/loarabia/Clang-tu...i/TutorialOrig >> <https://github.com/loarabia/Clang-tutorial/wiki/TutorialOrig> >>

Will do, Chris! Again, my apologizes. On 2017-08-29 01:18, Chris Lattner wrote: > HI Chad, > > As John points out, job postings to this list are okay if and only if > they are somehow related to LLVM. We understand that mistakes happen, > but please keep in mind for the future. Thanks! > > -Chris > >> On Aug 26, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Chad Rosier via llvm-dev

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Chad, >> >> This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe >>

Devang, I see the cause for confusion. Your message from this morning was specifically referring to this assert: Assertion `ExtVNI == VNI && "Unexpected existing value number"' failed. That assertion was fixed in the r144547. The PR shows this assert: Assertion failed: (isMetadata() && "Wrong MachineOperand accessor"), function Bisect fails until the

Hi John, I was posting the position on behalf of another team within my group, DCG.  The scope of the work is fairly broad and is closely related to the type of work we do with LLVM, but I don't believe the potential candidate will work directly on LLVM (at least that's not the immediate plan).  I apologize if I've somehow misused the mailing list; that was certainly not my

On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Chad Rosier wrote: > Devang, > I believe this has been fixed with llvm r144547. See: <rdar://problem/10441389>. It is likely that r144546 fixed some other bug. I just checked, this still fails with r144602. - Devang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, > If I compile the program using the following command line i.e. > > $ clang -O3 -lm *.c this may be doing link time optimization. > > then > > $ time ./a.out > > real 0m2.606s > user 0m2.584s > sys 0m0.012s > > BUT, if I use all the optimizations enabled with -O3 but specify them > explicity i.e. you can just use "opt -O3"

Hello Duncan I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is producing an error $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce $ clang *.s Regards Shahzad On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Shahzad, > >

All, I have some code that looks like the following: { double a, b, c; for (...) { ... a = lots of FP math; b = lots of FP math; c = lots of FP math; if (cond) { a = 0.0; b = 0.1; c = 0.2; } ... } } Could we not convert the hammock into a diamond and move the initial computation of a, b, and c into the else block. Something like this: {

Hello Duncan On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Shahzad, > > >> I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to >> produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is >> producing an error >> >> $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c >>

Hello I need some help here please. If we compile source files directly in to native code: $ clang -O3 -lm *.c then the runtime is like following real 0m2.807s user 0m2.784s sys 0m0.012s and If we emit LLVM bytcode and apply optimizations $ clang -O3 -c -emit-llvm *.c $ llvm-link *.o -o comb.ll $ time lli ./comb.ll then the runtime is real 0m2.671s user 0m2.640s sys 0m0.020s But, if I