similar to: [LLVMdev] Clang passes

Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still get bug in eraseFromParent(): While deleting: i32 (%class.B*, i32)* %_ZN1B1xEi An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! UNREACHABLE executed at /Users/neonomaly/LLVM/LLVM/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp:561! Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail 21.04.2012, в 23:45, Nick Lewycky написал(а): > Михаил wrote: >> How correctly

(Adding just a bit to Jake's response) On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:31 AM Jake Ehrlich via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Seiya, > > What should I prioritize? I suppose that improving llvm-objcopy is the >> most crucial work in this summer. > > > This is an opinion that will vary a lot from person to person. > +1! And don't forget that

It is ModulePass with AnalysisUsage of CallGraph Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail 22.04.2012, в 5:20, Nick Lewycky написал(а): > Михаил wrote: >> Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still get bug in >> eraseFromParent(): >> >> While deleting: i32 (%class.B*, i32)* %_ZN1B1xEi >> An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! >>

How correctly remove function from module? For example: int f1(int x) { ... a = f2(smth); ... } int f2 (int y) { ... b = f1(smth); ... } I need delete from module both f1 and f2. They haven't uses in other part of module, but I can't delete them with eraseFromParent, because they are use each other. Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part

I wrote a plugin using ASTConsumer and RecursiveASTVisitor to find "interesting" variables and functions. I'm wonder if there is a way to save/flag/metadata these so later on at the IR level I can use this information in a Pass. As far as I can tell nothing currently would allow me todo this and I'm wondering what exactly it would take to do something like this. After stairing

Михаил wrote: > It is ModulePass with AnalysisUsage of CallGraph Ah, then you'll need to update the CallGraph first. Use "CG.removeFunctionFromModule(F);" before deleting it. Nick > Yours sincerely, > Kadysev Mikhail > > 22.04.2012, в 5:20, Nick Lewycky написал(а): > >> Михаил wrote: >>> Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still

Михаил wrote: > Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still get bug in > eraseFromParent(): > > While deleting: i32 (%class.B*, i32)* %_ZN1B1xEi > An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! > UNREACHABLE executed at /Users/neonomaly/LLVM/LLVM/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp:561! The replaceAllUsesWith + eraseFromParent pattern remains correct, but there's

Hi, Isn't clang::CodeGenOptions::EmitDeclMetadata what you need? Vassil On 07/21/2011 04:32 AM, ret val wrote: > I wrote a plugin using ASTConsumer and RecursiveASTVisitor to find > "interesting" variables and functions. I'm wonder if there is a way to > save/flag/metadata these so later on at the IR level I can use this > information in a Pass. > > As far

Hi, I am writing a plugin to get information about the OpenMP constructs from the AST. I am basically writing a “RecursiveASTVisitor” and I am trying to find the OpenMP statement and get information like filename and line of code. When I am visiting recursively each statement I have my own switch on the “StmtClass” and for now I am focusing on “OMPParallelForDirectiveClass”. In my understanding,

Михаил wrote: > How correctly remove function from module? > For example: > > int f1(int x) { > ... > a = f2(smth); > ... > } > int f2 (int y) { > ... > b = f1(smth); > ... > } > > I need delete from module both f1 and f2. They haven't uses in other > part of module, but I can't delete them with eraseFromParent, because > they are use each

Hello, I am currently studying Computer Science at TU Eindhoven. I am doing a course that involves programming assignments on parts of LLVM such as lowering, scheduling and optimization. For this year's Google Summer of Code I plan to submit a proposal to implement a clang-based diff tool [1]. I think it really pays off to have decent developer tools available, as they can save tons of time.

Is it possible to merge StructTypes with different names like: %"class.std::allocator.4" = type { i8 } %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.5" = type { i8 } %"class.std::allocator.0" = type { i8 } %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.1" = type { i8 } %"class.std::allocator.0.6" = type { i8 } merge into %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator" = type

I am interested in putting together a tool which can verify that an external declaration conforms with the actual definition. A.c: extern int32_t foo(); Int bar() { return foo(); } B.c: int64_t foo() { ... } I had thought that I could use the debug information but the debug information in A.o does not include the type of the declaration "foo", just the type of bar. Is there a way to

Hi. I have such task: to get information about classes of work program (module) form Module (LLVM class), for example in ModulePass. I tried to analyze source code of LLVM architecture related with Module class, but I have not founded any useful information. Thanks! Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi. Can I know that in Module *M Function* F is a method of StructType *st? Also can I know that in this StructType the F has mark "virtual"? Thanks! Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120302/5c77c3ee/attachment.html>

Hi! I've have Instruction in my code: ... %call6 = call i32 %9(%class.A* %call3, i32 2) ... And I want to get something like this: ... %11 = icmp eq i32 (%class.D*, i32)* %10, @_ZThn4_N1D1xEi br i1 %11, label %12, label %14 ; <label>:12 ; preds = %7 %13 = bitcast %class.A* %call3 to %class.D* %call64 = call i32

Is it possible to use address of function in case block of switch instruction? I understand that it should be constants only, but in llvm reference i founded that: "The addresses of global variables and functions are always implicitly valid (link-time) constants. " Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Virtual call translates into IR like this: %0 = bitcast %class.A* %call to i32 (%class.A*, i32)*** %vtable = load i32 (%class.A*, i32)*** %0 %vfn = getelementptr inbounds i32 (%class.A*, i32)** %vtable, i64 0 %1 = load i32 (%class.A*, i32)** %vfn Is it possible to map pair [StructType, methodIndex(i64 0 in example)] into Function? Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next

LLVM Weekly - #1, Jan 6th 2014 ============================== Welcome to the inaugural issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. I've been a long time lurker on the LLVM and Clang mailing lists and have been using LLVM extensively in my PhD research for the past 4 years. I thought it might be worthwhile to

On Dec 12, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Garrison Venn wrote: >> I believe I caught most of the syntax style issues with the attached patch. It only contains >> these style changes. Thanks! I applied your followup patch in r121837. > Concerning the RecordKeeper reference in Record. Would you prefer to partially go > back to a more limited constrained version of a global. Since we are not