similar to: [LLVMdev] Badoo Banned

?Tienes un nuevo mensaje en Badoo! Marcos Ortiz te dej? un mensaje. Haz click en este enlace para verlo: http://us1.badoo.com/marcosluis2186/in/GZba-jJeopY/?lang_id=7 M?s gente que tambi?n te est? esperando: Relquis (Trinidad, Cuba) Yadiria (Trinidad, Cuba) Elcubanito (Trinidad, Cuba) http://us1.badoo.com/marcosluis2186/in/GZba-jJeopY/?lang_id=7 Si al hacer click sobre el enlace, no funciona,

Hi, We are using CTDB version 1.0.77 and yesterday we saw an instance of node running into issues and banning itself to recover (as listed below): node1: 2009/07/29 23:23:37.748251 [22371]: Banning node 0 for 300 seconds 2009/07/29 23:23:37.748263 [22371]: self ban - lowering our election priority 2009/07/29 23:23:37.748503 [22275]: This node has been banned - forcing freeze and recovery Now

Voc? tem uma nova mensagem no Badoo! Gilberto Nunes deixou uma mensagem pra voc?. Clique no link para abrir: http://us1.badoo.com/01097897898/in/BDGmMoCC9H8/?lang_id=61 E, outras pessoas estiveram procurando por voc?: Manoel Felipe (Joinville, Brasil)Mara Leal mendes (Joinville, Brasil)Tiago Gabriel (Joinville, Brasil) Se os links desta mensagem n?o funcionarem, copie e cole os links na barra

On Friday 19 April 2019 15:19:26 Pete Biggs wrote: > > I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested > > on another page: > > The standard exim.conf already has a 535 filter. Was that not working > for you? I was following the instructions as shown on the page. I did find after sending my post that there was already a regex in the standard

I find csf/lfd much easier to configure and can be used in combination with fail2ban. Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk> wrote: >I've followed one of the pages on line specifically for installing fail2ban on >Centos 7 and all looks fine. > >I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested on >another page: > >

> I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested on > another page: The standard exim.conf already has a 535 filter. Was that not working for you? > > \[<HOST>\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data > > which appears to be successfully matchnig lines in /var/log/exim/mail.log such > as > > 2019-04-19 13:06:10 dovecot_plain

> > The event that triggers the ban does complete as normal, which is what I would > expect as the ban is triggered by the log entry which is *after* the failed > attempt. > > However, after the /var/log/fail2ban.log showed the IP as banned, I continue > to see entries in /var/log/exim/main.log What ban action do you use? If it's something like iptables-multiport,

Hello folks, We have discovered that for the last few weeks our mailman server was used for a spam attack. The attacker would make use of the + feature offered by gmail and hotmail. If you send an email to example at hotmail.com, example+foo at hotmail.com, example+bar at hotmail.com, it goes to the same inbox. We were constantly hit with requests to subscribe to a few inboxes. These requests

Hello, Are our servers still facing the overload issue? My replies to gluster-users ML are not getting delivered to the list. Regards, Ravi On 09/19/2017 10:03 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le samedi 16 septembre 2017 ? 20:48 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit?: >> Hello folks, >> >> We have discovered that for the last few weeks our mailman server was >> used >> for a

I've followed one of the pages on line specifically for installing fail2ban on Centos 7 and all looks fine. I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested on another page: \[<HOST>\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data which appears to be successfully matchnig lines in /var/log/exim/mail.log such as 2019-04-19 13:06:10 dovecot_plain

On Saturday 20 April 2019 00:32:43 Pete Biggs wrote: > What ban action do you use? If it's something like iptables-multiport, > then I wonder if the fact that it's detecting the failures as > '[dovecot]' means that it's using the dovecot ports, not the exim > ports, when applying the iptable rule. > > When a host has been banned, can you look at the

Le samedi 16 septembre 2017 ? 20:48 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit?: > Hello folks, > > We have discovered that for the last few weeks our mailman server was > used > for a spam attack. The attacker would make use of the + feature > offered by > gmail and hotmail. If you send an email to example at hotmail.com, > example+foo at hotmail.com, example+bar at hotmail.com, it goes

> Has anyone created a fail2ban filter for this type of attack? As of > right now, I have manually banned a range of IP addresses but would > like to automate it for the future. > As far as I can see fail2ban only deals with hosts and not networks - I suspect the issue is what is a "network": It may be obvious to you looking at the logs that these are all related, but you

> > > > /var/log/fail2ban.log is showing that it's working: > > I have seem similar odd behaviour with f2b with other filters. > Try to uninstall the package > fail2ban-systemd > and stop and start fail2ban again. > This might change its behavior to the better. > The fail2ban-systemd package configures fail2ban to use systemd journal for log input. The OP

I'm looking for some beta testers to provide feedback on an Asterisk intrusion detection & prevention program we're releasing soon. As a quick overview, the program provides: - banning based on geographic location of source IP (Continent, country, region, city, etc) - detection and banning based on channels in use by a user - detection and banning based on rate of dialing - detection

On 1/9/20 2:08 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: >> Has anyone created a fail2ban filter for this type of attack? As of >> right now, I have manually banned a range of IP addresses but would >> like to automate it for the future. >> > As far as I can see fail2ban only deals with hosts and not networks - I > suspect the issue is what is a "network": It may be obvious to

Rene Bon Ciric te ha dejado un mensaje Este mensaje es personal. Sólo tú y su remitente tenéis acceso a él y te recordamos que lo puedes eliminar en cualquier momento. Si quieres responder puedes hacerlo desde el chat. Para leer tu mensaje, haz clic en el siguiente enlace: http://us1.badoo.com/renich/in/l-47pIIAagA/?lang_id=7&g=57&m=21&mid=51e14031000000000007000001f1ad310252eb3f00e9

Hello, I'm Ziyu Yu, a gsoc applier. I'm banned from the irc: * alapagos.oftc.net NOTICE AUTH :*** Looking up your hostname... * *** Checking Ident * *** Your forward and reverse DNS do not match, ignoring hostname. * *** No Ident response * *** Banned autokilled: We suspect this host of participating in a botnet. Mail support at oftc.net if you feel this in error. (2008-03-15 16:29:08) *

I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]: NOTICE [dovecot] Ban 77.40.61.224 2020-04-07 09:42:06,981

Paulo Coutinho left a message for you... Its sender and content will be shown only to you and you can delete it at any time. You can instantly reply to it, using the message exchange system. To find out what's in the message, just follow this link: http://us1.badoo.com/pcmnac/in/GUikHjCbJWY/?lang_id=3&m=63&mid=4f347a7e000000000003000027ee8a5b Some more patiently waiting folks: