similar to: [LLVMdev] Remove redundant code after frame index elimination

Hello. I have been trying to check, how llvm works on Solaris recently. First I have tested lli, whitch seems to execute the bytecode generated on Linux without any problems. However, llc has failed to generate valid SPARC assembler code even on the helloworld example. Here is the generated code: sakharov at trillian:~$ cat ./test.s .text .align 16 .globl main

Hi, There are some generated Sparc assembly code like this: main: ! @main ! BB#0: save %sp, -112, %sp sethi 0, %l0 or %g0, 5, %l1 st %l0, [%fp+-4] st %l1, [%fp+-8] st %l1, [%fp+-12] sethi %hi(.L.str), %l1 ld [%fp+-8], %o1 add %l1, %lo(.L.str), %l1 or %g0, %l1, %o0 call printf nop ld [%fp+-12], %o2 ld [%fp+-8], %l2 sethi %hi(.L.strQ521), %l3 add

On 1/20/11 12:27 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: Just out of curiosity, have either of you considered writing an LLVM transform that simply replaces these call instructions with inline assembly code that does what you want? If that works, it seems much simpler than modifying/enhancing the code generator. -- John T. > I have similar requirements for my project. This is what I do. >

For my case, I can't replace these call instructions with inline assembly code because I need to encode the registers into the "number". For instance, if the call instruction is %result = call i32 @foo(i32 %a) and the result is assigned to register %l0 and the variable "a" to register %l1, then I encode all foo, %l0 and %l1 and generate a sethi instruction. thanks,

Hello all, I am trying to modify the Sparc backend to do something for my team's project, to do the following. Whenever the backend encounters a call to one particular type of function names (functions like p0(), p1()..etc), I want the backend to generate a "sethi %g0, <number>", and NOT a "call p0, call p1..." instruction. However, the backend should work as usual

Hi, Chris > That is target independent code, so you should not put sparc specific changes there.  It sounds like one of the sparc-specific target hooks is wrong. Since sparc does not provide any hooks for operation of branches (e.g. AnalyzeBranch and friends) it might be possible that generic codegen code is broken in absence of these hooks. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty

Hi, I'm trying to implement __builtin_setjmp / __builtin_longjmp for Sparc processors. I think I'm very close, but I can't work out how to issue BuildMI-type instructions to load the address of the recovery location (set in setjmp) into a register using the SETHI / OR combination. I can't see any equivalent code anywhere else in Sparc. I imagine this is similar if I try to make a

I have similar requirements for my project. This is what I do. 1. Add a new intrinsic function to LLVM that corresponds to "functions with particular type of function names". The steps to create intrinsic function is documented in http://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html#intrinsic. 2. Create a lowering pass that lowers "functions with particular type" ( eg. p0, p1) to

I have data that plots over time with four different variables. I would like to combine them in one plot using facet_grid, where each variable gets its own sub-plot. The following code resembles my data require(ggplot2) require(reshape2) subm <- melt(economics, id='date', c('psavert','uempmed','unemploy')) mcsm <- melt(data.frame(date=economics$date,

>> Any thoughs? > > I'm now struggling to see how GCC justifies it. What if a different > translation-unit declared those variables in a different order? I also > can't get the same behaviour here, do you have a more complete > command-line? Ah, I see; the translation-unit that does the optimisation needs to have them as a definition (i.e. "= {0}") rather

Hello, I'm load testing a new Asterisk 13 system (Debian Stretch, packaged asterisk). One system writes CDR though an ODBC connection to a local Postgres database over the LAN. When sending 50 new calls per second with SIPp, I'm seeing one system outputs : taskprocessor.c: The 'subm:cdr_engine-00000003' task processor queue reached 5000 scheduled tasks again. This [1] thread

On 11/12/2009, at 10:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hi, Chris > >> That is target independent code, so you should not put sparc specific changes there. It sounds like one of the sparc-specific target hooks is wrong. > Since sparc does not provide any hooks for operation of branches (e.g. > AnalyzeBranch and friends) it might be possible that generic codegen > code is

I have a matrix M > dim(M) [1] 30380   561 I have another list L contains , that contains some row names of matrix M str (L)  chr [1:21037] Now I want to extract the submatrix subM (21037    ,    561)  from the matrix M by matching the rownames (M) to the 21037 rownames o f L How do I do that ? Thanks and regards, Pankaj Barah   Pankaj Barah Department of Biology  Norwegian University

Hi, I`ve recently upgraded a server from 1.8 to Asterisk 13. While everything is under control, I have one issue with the way CDRs are kept for queues. And I don`t mean ?I don`t like it?. I mean it crashes the server. I realize there are multiple CDRs per queue call ? one per ring/per phone, basically. The issue is that whenever the number of CDRs ?to be recorded? for a call exceeds 5000,

This showed up in RISKS and no one has mentioned it here yet, so.. OpenSSH contains lots of code like: char *password = read_passphrase(prompt, 0); [do stuff] memset(password, 0, strlen(password));

From: Evgeny Kravtsunov <emkravts@openvz.org> compare_ether_addr() implicitly requires that the addresses passed are 2-bytes aligned in memory. This is not true for br_stp_change_bridge_id() and br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id() in which one of the addresses is unsigned char *, and thus may not be 2-bytes aligned. Signed-off-by: Evgeny Kravtsunov <emkravts@openvz.org> Signed-off-by:

On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: > Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is > the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention). Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch will allow a bunch of block layout and branch optimizations to happen. > However I still wouldn't have expected that to result in the label > being

Hi, I have the following test code print.c: #include <stdio.h> int main(){ fprintf(stderr, "Error!\n"); return 0; } I did the following on linux to cross-compile it for Sparc architecture: clang -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm -o print.bc (or llvm-gcc -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm -o print.bc) llvm-dis < print.bc -o print2.bc llc -march=sparc -mcpu=v8 print2.bc -o print_s.s if

Hello! Can someone please help me in building debug version of klibc ? I've cloned git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git , but failed to build it with debug info added "-g" to HOSTCFLAGS in Makefile, but $ make -j KLIBCKERNELSRC=`pwd`/../linux-2.6/usr still strips every debug symbol , and i'm failed to change scripts/Kbuild.klibc and Makefile to remove strip

I have a class that is hand-coded (not generated using generator). Is there a preferred location for the file. app/components ? does it matter? Thanks, -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.