similar to: [LLVMdev] Announcement: LLBMC, the Low-Level Bounded Model Checker

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Carsten Sinz <carsten.sinz at kit.edu> wrote: > Perhaps some of you might be interested in this: > -- Carsten > > > ################################################################## > > *---------------------------------------------------* > * LLBMC: The Low-Level Bounded Model Checker * > * for C (and C++)

This looks very interesting. Do you plan to make the source code publicly available? -Hal On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 01:58 +0100, Carsten Sinz wrote: > Perhaps some of you might be interested in this: > -- Carsten > > > > > ################################################################## > > > *---------------------------------------------------* > *

We are very pleased to announce that a new version of LLBMC is available for download at http://llbmc.org. LLBMC is a high-precision static analyzer based on LLVM implementing a technique called "Bounded Model Checking". LLBMC can detect errors such as: - Illegal memory accesses (e.g., buffer overflows) - Integer overflows - Division by zero - Invalid bit shifts - Double frees

We are very pleased to announce that a new version of LLBMC is available for download at http://llbmc.org. LLBMC is a high-precision static analyzer based on LLVM implementing a technique called "Bounded Model Checking". LLBMC can detect errors such as: - Illegal memory accesses (e.g., buffer overflows) - Integer overflows - Division by zero - Invalid bit shifts - Double frees

LLBMC http://llbmc.org uses bounded model checking technique to find errors in LLVM IR.Model checking is essentially search, and since LLBMC is bounded, the search for errors is usuallyincomplete, hence the approach may not verify the entire program, however, it may be goodenough to find interesting errors. Best wishes,Andrew On Monday, 8 February 2016, 21:54, Scott Santucci via llvm-dev

I'd just like to thank everyone who replied on this; the suggestions and resources are very helpful! ~Scott On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Andrew Santosa <santosa_1999 at yahoo.com> wrote: > LLBMC http://llbmc.org uses bounded model checking technique to find > errors in LLVM IR. > Model checking is essentially search, and since LLBMC is bounded, the > search for errors

Hi, We are developing a bounded model checker for C/C++ programs (http://baldur.iti.kit.edu/llbmc/) that operates on LLVM's intermediate representation. While checking a C++ program that uses STL containers we noticed that llvm-gcc and clang handle pointer differences in disagreeing ways. Consider the following C function: int f(int *p, int *q) { return q - p; } Here's the

Hi Stephan, > We are developing a bounded model checker for C/C++ programs > (http://baldur.iti.kit.edu/llbmc/) that operates on LLVM's intermediate > representation. While checking a C++ program that uses STL containers > we noticed that llvm-gcc and clang handle pointer differences in > disagreeing ways. > > Consider the following C function: > int f(int *p, int *q)

Hello, all, My name is Scott Santucci and I'm a software developer kicking around various wild ideas. (I wish I had something more interesting to say about myself than that, but nothing comes to mind; my day job is in SQL and Java, nothing to do with LLVM.) I am wondering whether anyone has tried using LLVM to apply formal verification to program code. I'm thinking about trying to

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Sep 17, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So, when I embark on the next ThinLTO try build, probably this Sunday, >> should I append -Wl,-plugin-opt,jobs=NUM_PHYS_CORES to LDFLAGS >> and run ninja without -j or

Hello everyone, I am a novice with KLEE under LLVM. I am trying to build a KLEE project (on a new LLVM environment) and I have the following problem: echo Testing... Testing... echo There should be no assertion fails! There should be no assertion fails! klee -taint=direct taint_direct.o KLEE: output directory = "klee-out-8" klee: error: Cannot find linker input

Are there any "current" Linux distros that have installable packages for llvm, clang, nad klee? I am struggling to get klee built and need a working klee setup asap. Thanks in advance, Donald

Hi, The klee library directory is determined at compile time and cannot be changed afterwards. Have a look at tools/klee/main.cpp to see how it is computed. I usually use Klee without any install step, right from the build directory. This has never given me the error you see. Hope this helps, Jonas On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < alexandruionutdiaconescu at

Hi, I'm currently trying to find and fix memory leaks (compiling with ``-fsanitize=address``) in the KLEE tool [1] an having found some leaks and I'm having trouble suppressing them. I'm trying to suppress them using the ``-fsanitize-blacklist=blacklist.txt`` option as documented at [2]. I'm using Clang 3.7 ( Arch Linux package 3.7.0-6). The sort of reported leaks I see are ```

Hello, In my reading over the last couple of days, I have read that in order for klee to work with "native" Linux programs, I need to install the uClibc posix support for klee. I am not finding the uClibc source in the llvm svn repository anywhere. Is this still necessary for testing native Linux applications, and if so, where do I get the uClibc source to compile? Thanks in

Dear Developers, I am a Master's student at the ECE department of the University of Florida, USA.​​ For my research project, supervised by Prof. Mark Tehranipoor<http://tehranipoor.ece.ufl.edu/> and Prof. Farimah Farahmandi<http://farimah.ece.ufl.edu/>, I need to use Clang LLVM DataflowSanitizer library in KLEE. However, I have faced some difficulties (explained below) while

Hello, probably it is too late to be involved in GSoC, by I want discuss following idea: KLEE can generate tests only for main function level without any modifications of original code. It passes args specified by command line. I want implement automatic testcase generation for any imported function from tested code without its modification. First: parsing test code would collect input/output

When I try to execute the following example, I get an error message: /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mocha-0.5.4/lib/mocha/object.rb:40: in `expects'': undefined method `stub'' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from test8.rb:5 What could be the reason? I tried with the latest Mocha Ruby gem, and I also tried it with the Rails plugin. The example: require

Hi, I am trying to evaluate how complex would be to modify KLEE ( http://klee.llvm.org/ ) so that it can run LLVM bitcode compiled from Java code obtained with vmjc (from the VMKIT project). Your feedback will be very appreciated. I am familiar with KLEE but I would like to know more about VMKIT, so please point me to the right docs/source code if appropriate. After a quick look over

Hi, I'm using KLEE which supports only LLVM-2.9. In order to compile some c++ file which requires gcc 4.5, I built Dragonegg 2.9 with LLVM-2.9 and gcc 4.5.1 on a Linux x86_64 machine. It was sucessfully built. When I try to compile a c++ file using this plugin as below gcc test.cpp -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so I got this error: cc1plus: error: Cannot load plugin path/dragonegg.so