similar to: [LLVMdev] Efficient Constant Uniquing

Hi, Consider ConstantUniqueMap::getOrCreate() (in lib/VMCore/ConstantsContext.h): /// getOrCreate - Return the specified constant from the map, creating it if /// necessary. ConstantClass *getOrCreate(const TypeClass *Ty, ValRefType V) { MapKey Lookup(Ty, V); ConstantClass* Result = 0; ... For array (or struct or vector) constants, typically: ValType = vector<Constant*>

On Jun 24, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Jay Foad wrote: > Hi, > > Consider ConstantUniqueMap::getOrCreate() (in lib/VMCore/ConstantsContext.h): > > /// getOrCreate - Return the specified constant from the map, creating it if > /// necessary. > ConstantClass *getOrCreate(const TypeClass *Ty, ValRefType V) { > MapKey Lookup(Ty, V); > ConstantClass* Result = 0; > ...

> On 2015-Jun-02, at 12:37, Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com> wrote: > > On 06/01/2015 11:43, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: >> You can round-trip to bitcode, reading the module into the >> destination context. The following pseudo-code gives the idea: >> >> bool linkModuleFromDifferentContext(Module &D, const Module &S) { >>

So far I'm really liking the new type system -- I've been able to simplify my code generator in a number of areas. And the IR is now vastly more readable, both in the debugger (using dump()) and when printing modules via llvm-dis. It's a tremendous improvement. I do have a few comments / questions: -- I think I may be misunderstanding how named structs are supposed to be combined in

I'm trying to track down the problem with the assertion failure in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. This is the code: *case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot: *if* (GFI) { *const* Value *Alloca = I.getArgOperand(0); *const* Constant *TypeMap = cast<Constant>(I.getArgOperand(1)); * FrameIndexSDNode *FI = cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(getValue(Alloca).getNode());*

I've been absent from the list for a while due to a number of unexpected circumstances, including a hard drive failure on my primary desktop machine. However, the good news is that after 4 years of work, my LLVM-based compiler is nearing the state where I feel comfortable declaring an official 0.1 release. The language is called "Tart" and the one line summary is "Tart is to

I've spent the better part of a day trying to figure out why my generated assembly code isn't correct. Here is the IR code for my loop: loopbody2: ; preds = %test1 %i14 = load i32* %i5 ; <i32> [#uses=1] %get15 = call %tart.core.String*

Interestingly, I also get a similar error in a different executable (my unittest): pure virtual method called terminate called without an active exception 0 tartc 0x00000001010a8265 PrintStackTrace(void*) + 53 1 tartc 0x00000001010a88cc SignalHandler(int) + 364 2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff831341ba _sigtramp + 26 3 libSystem.B.dylib 0x7261742e65637365 _sigtramp +

On Apr 7, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Talin wrote: > > OK I've been checking this out some more, and the DIEs don't look valid to me. Take a look at this output from dwarfdump -v: > > 0x000000c7: TAG_subprogram [3] > 0x000000c8: AT_name( .debug_str[0x000001bd] = "construct" ) > 0x000000cc: AT_MIPS_linkage_name( .debug_str[0x000001c7] =

On 27 June 2011 18:58, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 25, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Jay Foad wrote: > >> I've played with the Clang bits of this. The biggest problem I've >> found is that Clang uses LLVM's type resolution not just for >> forward-declared structs/classes/unions, which convert >> straightforwardly to the new

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I recently started getting this error when I try to debug my >>> LLVM-compiled program in GDB:

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and >> several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now >> getting a "pure virtual method called"

I figured that there might be others out there who are trying to figure out how to write a personality function, so I've attached the one I have written as an example. The code is straight ANSI C. I used the GCC version as a reference, but I re-wrote most of it, and made the syntax more like the LLVM style. I also drew from a number of other personality functions for other languages that

Well, I am much happier now that I understand about dsymutil, and can actually step through my program in gdb. However, there are still some issues that are puzzling me. 1) First off, the debugger appears to stop at odd points. The IR for my main function looks correct to me: define i32 @"main(tart.core.Array[tart.core.String])->int"(%"tart.core.Array[tart.core.String]"*

Well, after many months of effort, my LLVM-based garbage collector is finally passing its unit tests. This represents a significant milestone for me in the development of my programming language, Tart. The collector itself is fairly rudimentary - a single-generation, copying collector. It does not yet support multi-threaded programs, but in practice there's no serious obstacle to supporting

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I

On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: > After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to work. I'm now able to actually single-step through my program and set breakpoints, and examine function parameters. > > However, I'm also seeing a lot of new problems which

On Nov 8, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: > >> After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to work. I'm now

After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to work. I'm now able to actually single-step through my program and set breakpoints, and examine function parameters. However, I'm also seeing a lot of new problems which weren't exposed before. After spending the better part of two

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: > > After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's > conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to > work. I'm now able to actually single-step through my program and set > breakpoints,