similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm: is it possible to merge semantic validation and compilation in a single stage?

Hi Charllls, I didn't really get it. Are you saying that you would execute some functions using the JIT then, later, those functions will be modified and thus need to be re-jitted? Ciao, Duncan. On 07/06/12 20:13, Charllls Alquarra wrote: > > Sorry if it comes out a bit pushy bumping my own question, but it's been really > difficult to find any info regarding this functionality

Sorry if it comes out a bit pushy bumping my own question, but it's been really difficult to find any info regarding this functionality in the mailing list archives. Just some emails i've found from people working on NaCl: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-December/046055.html  is there a branch where this is being work on, or is internal chromium project so far? Also

Hi, I want to execute functions in a module, this module will have dependencies resolved in other modules. the modules might change (dynamic compilation environment) so i would prefer not not link all the dependencies in a single monolithic module, that is, if it can be avoided I hope to use Linker::linkModules but this is always destructive. That is ok for one module depending on a single one,

Hi all, Is it too soon to start porting EH code to the new C++ API? Are there sample implementations? llvm.org/demo still uses the old EH gizmos. should we wait for 3.0 release? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110930/3bc09ea9/attachment.html>

On Sep 30, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Charllls Alquarra wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it too soon to start porting EH code to the new C++ API? Nope! :-) > Are there sample implementations? llvm.org/demo still uses the old > EH gizmos. should we wait for 3.0 release? If you're using the LLVM APIs, then looking at how it's implemented in clang is a good start:

On May 4, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: >> I don't know how realistic it is to model the loop buffer in the register allocator, but this would a very interesting thing to try to optimize for in a later pass. If an inner loop "almost" fits, then it would probably be worth heroic effort to try to reduce the size of it to shave off a few bytes. > > Jakob and I have

Hello Vikram, Saturday, September 6, 2003, 9:10:45 PM, you wrote: VSA> For any language with relatively sophisticated syntax and semantic VSA> rules, you will probably need a higher-level representation like an VSA> Abstract Syntax Tree in order to do type-checking and other kinds of VSA> checking. OK, concerning AST -- I see. Thank you. VSA> For OCAML, for example, the

LLVM developers: Does anyone have time and interest to review a libc++ change? https://reviews.llvm.org/D26920 Eric

Hi All, I'm new to * I wonder if anyone have an idea how to make the following with ASTCC. I would like to have all SIP phones to work on prepaid basis and without need to dial any access number, instead I would like to use the phone as normal dialing only the destination number, for example 00464090510. Then I would like to authenticate the call using the SIP Username and Secret check

> I would like to have all SIP phones to work on prepaid basis > and without need to dial any access number, instead I would > like to use the phone as normal dialing only the destination > number, for example 00464090510. I use the AccountCode for authentication. This is how, for example: exten => _00XX.,1,DeadAGI(astcc.agi,${ACCOUNTCODE},011${EXTEN:2}) > Once the call is

Good afternoon, Today I was working on a practice problem. It was simple, and perhaps even realistic. It looked like this: ? Get a list of all the data files in a directory ? Load each file into a dataframe ? Merge them into a single data frame Because all of the columns were the same, the simplest solution in my mind was to `Reduce' the vector of dataframes with a call to `merge'. That

On Apr 13, 2011, at 21:43 CDT, John McCall wrote: > And it's okay to have limited goals! I personally don't; I think we > should aim to get the IR design good enough to support crazy resumptive > languages with crazy custom unwinding schemes. But I need to know what > range of problems we're willing to consider solving before I can usefully > weigh different

Hi I am having problems trying to get a time match with iptables 1.3.5 and the latest pom it says time match only works in the prerouting stage but I really need to use the classify command which only works in the postrouting. Does any one have a patch for 2.6 kernel, latest pom and iptables 1.3.5 so time matching can occur in the post routing? machinenemae login: ipt_time loading ipt_time:

Hello, is there a special package/method to cross-validate linear fixed effects and mixed effects models (from lme)? I've tried cv.glm on an lme (hoping that it may deal with any kind of linear model ...), but it raises an error: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : couldn't find function "lme.formula" so I guess it's not dealing with an lme. I've realized that

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:39:26 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all! > I have been experimenting with alternative virtio ring layouts, > in order to speed up single stream performance. > > I have just posted a benchmark I wrote for the purpose, and a (partial) > alternative layout implementation. This achieves 20-40% reduction in >

Samba_Version: 2.2.6 Server_OS: Mandrake 8.2 Client_OS: NT 4 workstation There seems to be a issue on a Samba server when NT telnet sessions have roughly 1500-1600 files open on a samba server. The client has a Clipper database application that opens roughly 150 file handles per session. When logged into the NT4sp6a workstation machine locally, everything is fine. I am able to open the

I''m seeing an inconsistent application of validation in a single-table inheritance situation, and wanted to see if anyone else has seen this. I have the following: class Contact < ActiveRecord validates_presence_of :first_name ... end class EmployeeContact < Contact ... end If I do the following while running the server or in test mode, no error occurs eventhough the first

Hi! I''ve got a subscription form in which someone can decide to give a gift to someone else. So you have to enter subscriber and recipient data in one form. For my user model I use single-table inheritance. It works fine but I''ve got a bug in the validation which I''m not able to solve. For both users, subscriber and recipient, you have to enter an email address. It is

Hi all, To boot a Xen from grub, we normally use a Xen kernel and a domain0 kernel & initrd.img as its modules. Now, I want to merge these three files into one single kernel file, then I can boot it without modules. I am doing this because a simulator environment only has one file entry for the kernel. Do you guys have some hints on how to do that? BTW, I can merge the domain0 kernel &

So a lot of Rails apps (mine included) have multiple validations on a single attribute. For example: on the password field, validating that it is (a) not blank, (b) matches the confirmation, (c) is at least X characters long, and (d) contains at least 1 alpha and at least 1 numeric character. The problem is: if that field is blank, the default errors shows all four. That''s a little