similar to: [LLVMdev] x86 .s to llvm IR

On 04/04/2012 07:08 AM, Charles Davis wrote: > Hi, > > Here's one of my proposals for GSoC 2012. What do you think? > > Chip > > Project Title: Table-Driven Decompilation > > Abstract: > Over the years, the LLVM family has grown to include nearly every type of build tool in existence. One of the few missing is a decompiler. LLVM's TableGen tool could

Hi, I want to convert x86 assembly source code to LLVM assembly language. How can I do this? If there is no direct solution would it be possible to implement one within the LLVM infrastructure with as less efforts as possible? I need someone to push me in a right direction. I've spent several days looking for a solution and still not found any. Thanks, Sergey -------------- next part

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by

Hi, Here's one of my proposals for GSoC 2012. What do you think? Chip Project Title: Table-Driven Decompilation Abstract: Over the years, the LLVM family has grown to include nearly every type of build tool in existence. One of the few missing is a decompiler. LLVM's TableGen tool could potentially accelerate development of such a tool; most backends already have the information needed

Hi, I recently downloaded and installed the libcpu package (from http://libcpu.org ) that uses llvm as the backend on my linux machine. I have a piece of Motorola 88100 code (essentially the output of the 176.gcc benchmark from SPEC CPU 2000) that I am trying to run using this emulator, but I am running into errors when trying to run it. Has anyone been able to successfully use the m88k

On 3/12/15 8:14 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ahmed Bougacha > <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com <mailto:ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: > >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some > >> supported target) to LLVM IR?

What kinds of errors are you getting? On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Pradeep Ramachandran <pramach2 at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Hi, > I recently downloaded and installed the libcpu package (from http://libcpu.org > ) that uses llvm as the backend on my linux machine. I have a piece of > Motorola 88100 code (essentially the output of the 176.gcc benchmark > from SPEC CPU 2000) that

Hello, I'm running load testing sessions. My System Under Test is an asterisk 13 with 16GB, configured with maxfiles set to 400 000. This system is supposed do produce simple SIP trunking services without transcoding. The box sending call to my System Under Test is anabled with SIPp. I'm banging on a 700 concurrent calls/50 CAPS limit I would like to improve, if possible. Tests are

Hi - Not sure if anyone else saw this or cares about a decompiler (not personally tested) https://github.com/draperlaboratory/fracture I wonder if they have been in contact with anyone in the community in getting this upstreamed. Does it look interesting to anyone else? (thoughts/random comments/feedback)

Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like something that would be feasible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150312/36eae2e4/attachment.html>

I'm wondering if anyone is working on a machine code -> LLVM bitcode disassembler? Obviously, there won't be a one-to-one correspondence but it seems like you should be able to get close. There's always inline asm for the remaining fragments. So is there such a thing? Thank you, Bob

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Jevin Sweval <jevinsweval at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:57 AM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> Hi - >> >> Not sure if anyone else saw this or cares about a decompiler (not personally >> tested) >> https://github.com/draperlaboratory/fracture >> >> I wonder if

Hello r-help, I've been banging my head against the computer in an attempt to learn how to divide my matrix into segments by rows. I want to be able to return each segment as a newly named object. I've tried looking at the apply functions and creating a for loop but brain no work. Here's the basic starting objects that I believe would be needed to separate the matrix. mat <-

Hello, Banging my head against a wall here ... can anyone light the way to a pattern modification that would make the following TRUE? identical( grep( "^Intensity\\s[^HL]", c("Intensity","Intensity L", "Intensity H", "Intensity Rep1")), as.integer(c(1,4))) Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Joh

Dear All, Probably a one liner, but I am banging my head against the floor. Consider the following DF <- data.frame( x=1:10, y=10:1, z=rep(5,10), a=11:20 ) mn<-names(DF) but then I cannot retrieve a column by doing e.g, DF$mn[2] I tried to play with the quotes and so on, but so far with no avail. Any suggestion is welcome. Cheers Lorenzo

Hi all! As a long slackware user I'm a total noob in pam and I'm banging my head against a wall trying to set it up correctly to play nice with slackware's default pam configuration. One of the things I'm trying to accomplish is to be able to logon while the ad domain is available and have pam_mount automount the samba shares and to be able to do an offline logon and skip the

I have been setting up my domain server using FC2 and samba 3.0.9. First thing, for your information: In the notations in several sources, it tells you to user "logon path = \\%L\profiles\%u" this is wrong. It should be, "logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U". Now that I spent 5 million hours banging my head on a wall with that, how do I get he exist desktops on my 2000/XP

> On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:20, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > Meanwhile over here in CentOS land, you still see SSH password guessers banging on every public IP that responds to port 22. Why? Because it still occasionally works. Increase the password strength minima, and this class of worm, too, will quickly die out. If the Windows fix was firewall on by default,

I was banging my head against the wall trying to figure out why my Nagios install wasn't working on CentOS 4.5 (I'm used to Debian), and so I disabled SELinux and everything magically started working. Is this a good long term idea? Or is there a better way of doing things? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving the kernel source[2], but doesn't describe how to apply patches. Instructions I've found apply to CentOS5, and RH has changed their kernel packaging since then. I've been banging my head on this off and on