similar to: [LLVMdev] Problem with building llvm-gcc

Thank you, I did try that and got the following error: checking for library containing strerror... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. make[1]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ghoang/llvm-test/llvm-gcc-2.8-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 I also tried adding --disable-libiberty but make would fail even earlier

try --disable-libmudflap when you config llvm-gcc FE:) On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Giang Hoang <ghoang84 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to build the front end llvm-gcc 2.8 on 32-bit Ubuntu 10.04, > using gcc 4.2.4.  I was able to configure and build llvm-2.8 in the > directory llvm-2.8-build.  Here is the command I used to configure llvm-gcc > build: >

Hi, I wonder if anyone has been able to successfully build llvm-gcc as an Alpha cross compiler? I have tried many different combinations of flags and gcc compiler, but have not been able to build successfully. Currently, this is the command that I used to build on Ubuntu 10.10: ../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.8.source/configure --enable-llvm=/home/ghoang/research/llvm/llvm-objects --enable-languages=c,c++

Thanks Andrew. I would like to clarify what I tried to do. I want to use llvm-gcc on x86 linux to compile C programs into Alpha binary. Giang On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org>wrote: > llvm-gcc doesn't not compile *on* alpha (128bit fp and int issues). I > haven't tried it as a cross compiler. > > Andrew > > On Fri, Oct

llvm-gcc doesn't not compile *on* alpha (128bit fp and int issues). I haven't tried it as a cross compiler. Andrew On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Giang Hoang <ghoang84 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if anyone has been able to successfully build llvm-gcc as an Alpha > cross compiler? > > I have tried many different combinations of flags and gcc

Hi, For my work, I want to use LLVM to compile SPEC 2k for Alpha. Since Alpha support has been dropped, I tried using version 2.8, but it is quite buggy, probably because the Alpha backend has not been maintained. I was wondering if there is an earlier version where the Alpha backend is stable enough to compile SPEC 2k? For my purpose, I do not need the most advanced optimizations, so an

Hi Giang, Given that the community deprecated the Alpha backend, I'm doubtful anyone would be able to point you in the right direction. Have you iteratively tried the difference versions of LLVM (i.e., 2.9, 2.8, 2.7 on down the line)? Chad On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Giang Hoang <ghoang84 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > For my work, I want to use LLVM to compile SPEC 2k

If you're building llvm-gcc4, you don't need the runtime libraries, so I'd just stick with the "tools-only" build and declare success. If you're building llvm-gcc3, I'd suggest you switch to llvm-gcc4 :) However, the problem appears to be your PATH variable. In your path you have the following directory: C:/Program Files/Microsoft DirectX SDK (June

Hi! I'm trying to build LLVM under cygwin. I have the latest version of cygwin and CVS versions of llvm, llvm-test and llvm-gcc. make of tools only succeeded. make of frontend succeeded too but full make of llvm failed on crtend in llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries with the following message: llvm[0]: Compiling crtend.c for Debug build (bytecode) /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected

Hi, I encountered an error while trying to use the indirectbr instruction with Alpha backend (current build). Here's part of the code sequence that I tried to compile: bb1: %1 = load i32* %i, align 4 %2 = add nsw i32 %1, 1 store i32 %2, i32* %i, align 4 indirectbr i8* blockaddress(@main, %bb1), [ label %bb1 ] br label %return This compiles correctly when I use the X86 or PPC

Hi, For my research, I need to reshape the current ARM backend to support armv2a. Zero-extend half word load (ldrh) is not supported by armv2a, so I need to make the code generation to not generate ldrh instructions. I want to replace all those instances with a 32-bit load (ldr) and then and the result with 0xffff to mask out the upper bits. These are the modifications that I have made to

> > If you're building llvm-gcc4, you don't need the runtime libraries, so > I'd just stick with the "tools-only" build and declare success. If > you're building llvm-gcc3, I'd suggest you switch to llvm-gcc4 :) I switched to llvm-gcc4 but when I run make from obj folder i run into folowing errors: Can't find a library with no dependencies at

I'm getting following errors while cross compiling llvm for ARM. Please help since it is urgent and critical My gcc version is 4.2.0, 32bit Linux and target is ARM Configure options are: ./configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=armv7fl-montavista-linux-gnueabi --enable-cross --with-sysroot=/home//arm_v7_vfp_le/target/

On Jun 11, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > I've committed my scripts that simplify building Linux/x86 -> Linux/ > ARM crosstool. There are 2 parts to using this: > > * llvm/utils/crosstool/create-snapshots.sh > creates tarballs for LLVM and LLVM-GCC from HEAD SVN or a specific > revision of your choice > * llvm/utils/crosstool/ARM/build-install-linux.sh

So, I'm trying to build everything from source for the Debian package for LLVM, including the C/C++ front end. I'm running this build on LLVM 1.4 source (the released tarball), using Debian unstable (gcc 3.3.5, on a 2.6.8 kernel, on an x86_64 box, dual CPU). Before I get _too_ deep into it, I thought I would ask if the following compilation failure on the CFE looks the least bit familiar

On 2010-06-04 13:41, Sanjeev C wrote: > I get following errors: > > /home/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source/host-i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/xgcc > -B/home/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source/host-i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/ > -B/usr/local/armv7fl-montavista-linux-gnueabi/bin/ > -B/usr/local/armv7fl-montavista-linux-gnueabi/lib/ -isystem > /usr/local/armv7fl-montavista-linux-gnueabi/include -isystem >

Hi, folks I am trying to build LLVM-GCC 4.2 on a Linux/PowerPC machine. Actually, the PowerPC is a PS3. The source was downloaded from http://llvm.org/releases/2.8/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.8.source.tgz Here is my system information and configuration options: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $ uname -a Linux ps3 2.6.32-rc2-00995-g96ebbe6-dirty #2 SMP Fri Oct 2

Anyone else seeing this? LLVM/gcc-4.2.llvm-objects/./gcc/xgcc -BLLVM/gcc-4.2.llvm-objects/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -g -O2 -I.

> It builds here (Linux x86_64), I use the following configure line: > ../llvm-gcc4.2/configure > --prefix=/home/edwin/llvm-svn/obj42/../install --program-prefix=llvm- > --enable-llvm=/home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/ --disable-multilib > --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++ I'm using (x86-64 linux, gcc 4.3) ../gcc-4.2.llvm/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gnat-llvm

2009/6/12 Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> > Thanks, this should be useful. What problem did you have with svn > revisions after 70786? /tmp/llvm-project.p28262/obj/llvm-gcc-4.2/./gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/llvm-project.p28262/obj/llvm-gcc-4.2/./gcc/ -B/tmp/llvm-73246/llvm-project/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/llvm-gcc-4.2/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/