similar to: [LLVMdev] Loop Extractor

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> Date: Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Extract Loop Failing To: Cameron Zwarich <zwarich at apple.com> I'm not sure it's a bug. If I don't know if I am properly using it then how would I know it's a bug and not simply a user issue? If it sounds like a bug to you then

How do you expect people to be able to tell you if you are using it properly if they can't see how you are using it? Cameron On Jan 12, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Ryan Taylor wrote: > I'm not sure it's a bug. If I don't know if I am properly using it then how would I know it's a bug and not simply a user issue? If it sounds like a bug to you then I will file it. :) > > On

It looks like this problem only exists on nested loops, ideas? On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > Is it not a good idea to try and extract loops that have multiple exits? > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to use ExtractLoop() but I am getting segFaults:

Preamble: ========= In spatial point pattern analysis an important component of a point pattern object is the *observation window*. In the spatstat package we have the function owin() to *construct* such a window. It creates an object of class "owin" which can happily exist separately from any point pattern object (object of class "ppp"). However we have at the moment

Is it not a good idea to try and extract loops that have multiple exits? On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am trying to use ExtractLoop() but I am getting segFaults: > > 0 opt 0x00000000008edc2f > 1 opt 0x00000000008edfda > 2 libpthread.so.0 0x00007ffe21203c60 > 3 opt 0x0000000000895ed9

Apologies, forgot to copy R-help on this response. Begin forwarded message: From: Roger Koenker <rkoenker at illinois.edu> Subject: Re: [R] effects() extractor for a quantile reqression object: error message Date: September 6, 2024 at 8:38:47?AM GMT+1 To: "Christopher W. Ryan" <cryan at binghamton.edu> Chris, This was intended to emulate the effects component of lm()

Sorry, forgot to add group to CC. On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > Cameron, > > To make it less vague, I would ideally like to traverse top down. I > believe what you suggested is what I want, I will have a look at it. > > Currently, I am iterating over the BBs in a Function, so > Function::iterator BBitr=F->begin(),

Nick, Thanks for this info, though this didn't help my problem at all. On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Never create a Twine as a local variable. > > V->setName(Twine("new_name")); > > should work fine, however. Note that Twine itself has an implicit > constructor from const char *, so this code: > >

Is there a way to cast the rpo_iterator to a basic block pointer? I need to use the functions of the class Basic Block. On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, forgot to add group to CC. > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Cameron, >> >> To make it less vague,

So is this simply not possible? On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > Nick, > > Thanks for this info, though this didn't help my problem at all. > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > >> Never create a Twine as a local variable. >> >>

LLVMers, Is there any way to guarantee iteration of the basic blocks from top down or path to path? Currently it looks sort of semi-random, sometimes visiting loop heads first and other times loop tails, is there a way I can visit the BBs top down or path to path? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am trying to use ExtractLoop() but I am getting segFaults: 0 opt 0x00000000008edc2f 1 opt 0x00000000008edfda 2 libpthread.so.0 0x00007ffe21203c60 3 opt 0x0000000000895ed9 llvm::Value::getName() const + 9 4 LLVMEXITCDFG.so 0x00007ffe202b80d7 5 opt 0x00000000006fc6e7 llvm::LPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) + 1143 6 opt

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> Date: Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Order of Basic Blocks To: Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at googlemail.com> This worked, though the RPO_iterator apparently wasn't what I was looking for anyways, it seems it doesn't rreally go top->down. I have a simple example code,

Basically I have two separate passes (first is a loop pass) which are two different files and two different opts but I need to keep the data consistent (ie, I want the changes to show up the resulting .bc output file from the first (loop) pass so the second pass can use these new names. Currently, when I print out "BB->getName().str()" after the code below, I get the correct renaming

hi! i have a little problem: my data's matrix has 1093 rows and 3 columns. i'd like to extract each rows.. something like this: ht= my matrix Dt=(???)=a vector with t=1,2...1093 what can i do? thank you! Vincenzo -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/extractor-rows-from-a-matrix-tf3913088.html#a11094459 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I would have thought this would have been possible. On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > So is this simply not possible? > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Nick, >> >> Thanks for this info, though this didn't help my problem at all. >> >>

Never create a Twine as a local variable. V->setName(Twine("new_name")); should work fine, however. Note that Twine itself has an implicit constructor from const char *, so this code: V->setName("new_name"); should also work fine. Nick Ryan Taylor wrote: > Basically I have two separate passes (first is a loop pass) which are > two different files and

<body> <div> <font face="Arial"> </font> </div> <div> ¡¡ </div> <div> <strong><font color="#ff0080" size="4" face="Arial">Direct Email Blaster</font></strong> </div> <font size="2"> <font face="Arial"><font

I have from time to time seen inquiries on r-help in respect of how to obtain the estimated standard deviation from the output of fitting a linear model. And have had occasion to want to do this myself. The way I currently do it is something like summary(fit)$sigma (where fit is returned by lm()). It strikes me that it might be a good idea to have an extractor function, analogous with coef()

<HEAD> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=2> <DIV><FONT face=Arial> </FONT> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ff0080 face=Arial size=4>Direct Email Blaster</FONT></STRONG> </DIV><FONT size=2> <FONT face=Arial><B><FONT