similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH][Compiler-rt] Windows implementation of mmap functionality in clear_cache_test and enable_execute_stack_test

Hi Ruben, > I see I missed some curly braces. I also modified spacing a tiny bit. Doesn't seem so. E.g. you have: + if ( !VirtualQuery(addr, &b, sizeof(b)) ) + exit(1); + if( !VirtualProtect(b.BaseAddress, b.RegionSize, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &b.Protect) ) Add space after "if". Do not put spaces after "(" and before ")". Same for other

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> Date: 2012/1/7 Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [PATCH][Compiler-rt] Windows implementation of mmap functionality in clear_cache_test and enable_execute_stack_test To: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> 2012/1/7 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Hello Ruben

2012/1/7 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Hi Ruben, > > > I see I missed some curly braces. I also modified spacing a tiny bit. > Doesn't seem so. E.g. you have: > > + if ( !VirtualQuery(addr, &b, sizeof(b)) ) > + exit(1); > + if( !VirtualProtect(b.BaseAddress, b.RegionSize, > PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &b.Protect) ) >

Hi Ruben, > Thanks for having patience :), Looks ok. Do you need me to commit this for you? Or you have the commit access? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Op 11 jan. 2012 14:00 schreef "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info> het volgende: > > Hi Ruben, > > > Thanks for having patience :), > Looks ok. Do you need me to commit this for you? Or you have the commit access? Please commit this for me. I don't have commit access. Thanks! Ruben > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov >

2013/5/30 Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > 2013/5/25 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> > >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ruben Van Boxem >> <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I submitted this patch a long while ago, together with a bunch of other >> > changes (some of which got

I created an application that uses dynamic forking and it works perfect in windows, but fails in wine. Is this a bug or is this feature disabled in Wine? I don't have wine myself but someone we have testing the app for us does. It's difficult to debug over the net so I was hoping for some help here... After adding some debug info we've traced a few failure points to a call to

Hi all, I''ve got the latest win32-mmap code checked into CVS. Unfortunately, it seems that I''m not able to open an existing mapping and retrieve set data. Below is a simple example that seems like it ought to work but doesn''t. Any ideas? # map1.rb require ''win32/mmap'' include Win32 mmap = MMap.new(:name => ''alpha'', :size

Hi, I am trying to compile/test compiler-rt for Windows (MinGW). I used Clang and GCC, and GCC had a lot more success here. I had to build with "mingw32-make -i" because the clear_cache_test is not written for Windows. I can't seem to find any alternative to __clear_cache on Windows, so it might be a nonsensical test to run. GCC test results: 87% tests passed, 12 tests failed out

Attached is a patch to pull in the correct endian.h file on the BSD'. I checked all OS' on the defined list and they all require machine instead of sys. While there I added __Bitrig__ which is a newly launched OS that uses clang as it's compiler. diff --git a/lib/int_endianness.h b/lib/int_endianness.h index 70bd177..f821f9a 100644 --- a/lib/int_endianness.h +++

On 14 March 2014 16:34, JF Bastien <jfb at google.com> wrote: > How does this overlap with: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140310/thread.html#208333 The builtin was created to call __clear_cache() on platforms that need it (like ARM and MIPS), but to be ignored on others (like x86_64). This builtin should call __clear_cache() from whatever

Folks, To implement this bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19142 I need an LLVM intrinsic to communicate the need to lower the builtin wither to noop or a call or even a sequence of instructions. I thought about: void @llvm.clear_cache(i8 * begin, i8 * end) to simulate precisely GCC's builtin: void __builtin___clear_cache (char *begin, char *end) which will be, by default,

Hello, I've just found that the current SVN trunk has some toolchain dependencies on ARM cross compiling. i.g. the __clear_cache in lib/System/Memory.cpp is not defined in my toolchain (codesourcery 2007q3, gcc version 4.2.1). What is the official(?) toolchain version used for ARM cross-compilation? Best, Hyok -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Prasanth J skrev: > Hi, > > i am a newbie to llvm architecture. i have been trying to port llvm on > ARM target. i am using the following configuration for cross compiling > llvm. > > ../llvm/configure --host=arm-linux --target=arm-linux > --build=i686-linux --prefix=/opt/llvm-arm/ --enable-optimized > --disable-debug \ > --disable-expensive-checks --disable-doxygen

Prasanth J wrote: > Hi, > > I can able to compile LLVM using armgcc_4.3.3 (codesourcery2009q1..).. > but when i tried to run it on target it shows GCC 4.3.0 version not > found. So i copied the runtime libraries (libc.so and libgcc_s.so) > from the toolchain to the target and exported its path in > LD_LIBRARY_PATH. But when i tried to run any llvm tools on target its >

Hi, i am a newbie to llvm architecture. i have been trying to port llvm on ARM target. i am using the following configuration for cross compiling llvm. ../llvm/configure --host=arm-linux --target=arm-linux --build=i686-linux --prefix=/opt/llvm-arm/ --enable-optimized --disable-debug \ --disable-expensive-checks --disable-doxygen \ --disable-threads --enable-targets=cbe,cpp,arm using this

Hi, I'm compiling LLVM libraries for android platform using android nk r4 from crystax that supports c++ and rtti libs. I'm facing the problem that there gcc compiler doesn't support __clear_cache function of Memory.cpp (line 699) for the librarie LLVMSystem. Is there a way to bypass this limitation without puts a comment on this line? Regards Jérôme Gorin -------------- next part

Dear all, I hope this is the right list :). I'd like to submit the attached patch for committing. The attached patch are the only required changes to make the latest compiler-rt build and pass tests (except for 2 currently ignored tests..) on Minix. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi folks, I just tried to build LLVM on FreeBSD/arm. It looks like libSystem doesn't build and requires the following hack: --- lib/System/Memory.cpp +++ lib/System/Memory.cpp @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ for (intptr_t Line = StartLine; Line < EndLine; Line += LineSize) asm volatile("icbi 0, %0" : : "r"(Line)); asm volatile("isync"); -# elif defined(__arm__)

Hi all I received the following patch for compiling ctypes module for Python on FreeBSD from Keith White (I'm in no position to judge this fix, I'm just passing it on). Is there anyone on this list being able to commit this code? Thxs, Werner =================================================================== --- contrib/compiler-rt/lib/clear_cache.c (revision 250739) +++