similar to: [LLVMdev] Position Dependent Loading in LLVM Modules

James, Sure. I want to inline functions in a C program that has no external node, or "main". So the "top" function is not main and there does not exist a main in the file. Thanks. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > > Do you know if it's possible to inline functions without an external >

Hi Ryan, > Do you know if it's possible to inline functions without an external node? Sorry, I don't know to what you're referring here. Could you please rephrase? what do you mean be "external node"? Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: Ryan Taylor [ryta1203 at gmail.com] Sent: 12 March 2012 17:58 To: James Molloy Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Ryan, I see. Well, that shouldn't be an issue. If you link the bitcode files together with llvm-link you can then do several things: (1) Run clang on it as you normally would with -O3 for maximum inlining (2) Run 'llc' manually with -O3 and LTO, which will do the maximum link time optimisations. (3) Run 'opt' manually with -O3, LTO which will produce another bitcode file,

James, Thanks. It wouldn't take the LTO option; however, I can get it to inline using -cppgen=inline. However, when I run clang the second time it gives me an error, stating that it expects a top level entity. I think I've run into this issue before. Any ideas? On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:30 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > I see. Well,

I believe it might actually. Do you know if it's possible to inline functions without an external node? It doesn't appear to be so. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:24 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Ryan,**** > > ** ** > > I would just compile to multiple IR files then link them together with > llvm-link.**** > > ** ** > > Would that

Hello All, Does LLVM even support position dependent loading in bitcode files? For example, how would I go about loading a module at a specific address without a custom linker? Thanks

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM, James Molloy via

>but is there or is there not accessible, visible state, Wouldn't ReadNone and/or ReadOnly cover that? If ReadNone is set, it means it doesn't access any of the visible (accessible) states. - Vaivaswatha On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:17 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think the attribute as is is strong enough to do what you

Hi all, Sorry for arriving late to the party. First, some context: vld1 is not the same as a pointer dereference. The alignment requirements are different (which I saw you hacked around in your testcase using attribute((aligned(4))) ), and in big endian environments they do totally different things (VLD1 does element-wise byteswapping and pointer dereferences byteswaps the entire 128-bit

Hey all, Below is the proposed format for the dump of the ThinLTO module summary in the llvm-dis utility: > ../build/bin/llvm-dis t.o && cat t.o.ll ; ModuleID = '2.o' source_filename = "2.ll" target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" @X = constant i32 42, section "foo", align

Ok, my spec95 installation is completely different, so I'll try and figure out what options are needed for each benchmark separately by looking at the code that creates the makefiles. Meanwhile, I had another question - is there a way in llvm to look at the SSA form of a program and then modify the SSA, and then recompile this modified SSA ? If so, is there any documentation regarding

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM, James Molloy via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > You don't appear to have addressed my suggestion to not require a perfect > > external world, instead to measure the overhead of an imperfect world (by > >

Hi, I am trying to generate LLVM bytecode using CLANG and I ran into the following problem. If I run clang with the -emit-llvm option and then try to get a textual representation of the output using llvm-dis, the latter crashes because of a failed assertion in BitCodeReader.cpp, mentioning a "Type mismatch in value table" (the exact error message is appended at the end of this email).

On 2020-08-24 08:45, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 24/08/2020 14:09, K.R. Foley wrote: >> Regarding the statement "they will ignore the PDC" above, is there >> really no way to undo that? > > Only by not letting your clients contact the AD DC. > > One of the first things that the migration to AD script does is to > obtain the SID from the NT4-style

2017-06-06 13:38 GMT-07:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:26 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2017-06-05 14:27 GMT-07:00 David Blaikie via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >> >>> I know there's been a bunch of discussion here already, but I was >>> wondering if

2017-06-05 14:27 GMT-07:00 David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > I know there's been a bunch of discussion here already, but I was > wondering if perhaps someone (probably Teresa? Peter?) could: > > 1) summarize the current state > 2) describe the end-goal > 3) describe what steps (& how this patch relates) are planned to get to (2) > >

2017-06-07 10:19 GMT-07:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:01 AM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2017-06-07 9:44 GMT-07:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:21 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

2017-06-07 9:44 GMT-07:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:21 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2017-06-06 13:38 GMT-07:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:26 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Hi, For the first problem, try clang -S -emit-llvm test.c -o test.ll you should get the llvm IR and you don't need to use llvm-dis. Although I have tried your example with the exact commands and source code you posted and it worked just fine for me. I also use clang and LLVM 2.8 compiled from sources. For the second problem, suppress -emit-llvm, since you want the executable, not an object

I'm going to rephrase my question Are any of you using any time of single signon technology to interact with active directory in a development project? I'd like to be able to grab the authentication with a user first authenticates as a domain admin via, say Apache, and then re-use this auth to give this admin a list of domian user. Not sure of the best approach. -- Greg J. Zartman