similar to: [LLVMdev] striping of stdio information in llvm-gcc and clang

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:43:01PM -0800, Eli Friedman wrote: > clang's cross-compilation support isn't really mature; you might be > able to get away with specifying "-ccc-host-triple sparc-sun-solaris > -nostdinc -I /path/to/sparc/headers/". Please read that as "clang's cross-compilation support is not magical". It's not a question of maturity that

Thanks! On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:43:01PM -0800, Eli Friedman wrote: >> clang's cross-compilation support isn't really mature; you might be >> able to get away with specifying "-ccc-host-triple sparc-sun-solaris >> -nostdinc -I /path/to/sparc/headers/". >

Hi Joerg, How do I find /path/to/sparc/headers/? Many hanks, Christine On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Linlin Cheng <linlin at caltech.edu> wrote: > Thanks! > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:43:01PM -0800, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> clang's cross-compilation

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Linlin Cheng <linlin at caltech.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following test code print.c: > > #include <stdio.h> > > int main(){ >        fprintf(stderr, "Error!\n"); >        return 0; > } > > I did the following on linux to cross-compile it for Sparc architecture: > clang -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm

This showed up in RISKS and no one has mentioned it here yet, so.. OpenSSH contains lots of code like: char *password = read_passphrase(prompt, 0); [do stuff] memset(password, 0, strlen(password));

Hi, I am trying to replace a c-style function with another function with same signature. Consider the following code: std::stringstream main_c; main_c <<"#include <stdio.h>\n" <<"extern \"C\" { \n" <<"int print1()\n" <<"{\n" <<" printf(\"Inside

Hi Sadrul, > On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:40 PM, Sadrul Chowdhury via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi! I am trying to get a combined coverage report from multiple > executables. Looking at earlier discussions [1, 2], it looks like this > is supposed to work. I am having some difficulty getting this to work > as I would expect it to work, however. Following is

Hi! I am trying to get a combined coverage report from multiple executables. Looking at earlier discussions [1, 2], it looks like this is supposed to work. I am having some difficulty getting this to work as I would expect it to work, however. Following is a simple case to explain: ////////// shared.h #include <string> void Print1(const std::string& msg); void Print2(const

Hello, I configure my PDc as print server. With cups, I configure 3 printers (names : print1 print2 and prinnt3). After that I saw the error in the last printer's name. So I delete prinnt3 and create print3). But if I connect to my print server (using Windows), I have 4 printers : print1 -3 and prinnt3 I restart cups and reload smb daemon several times but the ghost is still there. I

Hello, Suppose I have x, which is a variable of class numeric. The calculations performed to yield x imply that mathematically it should be an integer , but due to round-off errors, it might not be (and so in either direction). The error is however small, so round(x) will yield the appropriate integer value. Moreover, this integer values is guaranteed to be representable by an

From: techzone2020@hotmail.com To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch; r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: R.dll Reg., Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:57:52 +0530 Sir, I am working in R language currently.I want to link R.dll with VISUAL BASIC in order to create GUI FRONT END.But i couldnt link because of that file is copyrighted by "R Development Core Team 1995-2008". Please

From: techzone2020@hotmail.com To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch; r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: R.dll Reg., Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:57:52 +0530 Sir, I am working in R language currently.I want to link R.dll with VISUAL BASIC in order to create GUI FRONT END.But i couldnt link because of that file is copyrighted by "R Development Core Team 1995-2008". Please

Dear all, can somebody give me some pointer how I can fit a "linear-by-linear association model" (i.e. loglinear model for the ordinal variables) in R? A brief description can be found here 'https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat504/node/141'. Thanks for your help

Hey there, If you're like me, you've tried EVERYTHING to lose weight.  I know how you feel - the special diets, miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped me lose the pounds I need lose either.  It seemed like the harder I worked at it, the less weight I lost - until I heard about 'Extreme Power Plus'. You're probably thinking to yourself, "Oh geez, not

Long time no chat! How have you been? If you've been like me, you've been trying trying almost EVERYTHING to lose weight.  I know how you feel - the special diets, miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped me lose the pounds I needed to lose either.  It seemed like the harder I worked at it, the less weight I lost - until I heard about 'Extreme Power Plus'.

Given an arbitrary data frame, it is easy to exclude a column given its index: df[,-2]. How to do the same thing given the column name? A naive attempt df[,-"name"] did not work :)

Hi Duncan, > I couldn't find the solution to my problem (if it has one) in the mailing >> list or the source code. The problem is: how can I redefine a function >> that's been called already by some other function? >> > > why do you want to do this? > To implement something that is common in Lisp. Suppose I have a program that is running and can't be

I've got a matrix with 2 columns and n rows. I need to sort it first by the values in column 1 ascending. Then for values which are the same in column 1, sort by column 2 decending. For example: 2 .5 1 .3 1 .5 3 .2 Goes to: 1 .5 1 .3 2 .5 3 .2 This is easy to do in spreadsheet programs but I can't seem to work out how to do it in R and haven't been able to find a solution anywhere.

And, one more weird thing in this function. The FILESize static variable is never initialized so its likely initial value is 0 due to zero fill on many MMUs. The value is never written and used as a divisor. Why hasn't this function caused an arithmetic violation? Because the IOBBase point, also a static variable is initialized to zero and never modified and used in a conditional that thwarts

I mis-stated what I think should be deleted. The block of code from "GlobalVariable *IOB = 0;" to the end of the loop should be delted because the only effect the loop has is on the IOB variable and that variable is never used after the loop. Reid. On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 18:14, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on bug 122, consolidating the interface to the