similar to: [LLVMdev] New to LLVM- Guidance required.

On 11/11/2017 12:44 PM, Amara Emerson wrote: > >> On Nov 10, 2017, at 10:04 PM, Aditya Nandakumar <proaditya at gmail.com >> <mailto:proaditya at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> The current DAGCombine, being constructed on top of SDAG, has a kind >>> of built-in CSE and automatic DCE. How will things change, if >>> they'll change, in

> On Nov 11, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 11/11/2017 12:44 PM, Amara Emerson wrote: >> >>> On Nov 10, 2017, at 10:04 PM, Aditya Nandakumar <proaditya at gmail.com <mailto:proaditya at gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The current DAGCombine, being constructed on top of

Hi , Currently GobalIsel like FastIsel designed to use fallback to DAGIsel in case of failure. You can use -global-isel-abort=2 option. llc -global-isel -pass-remarks-missed="gisel-*" -global-isel-abort=2 simple_foo.ll Regards, Igor From: S. Bharadwaj Yadavalli [mailto:bharadwajy at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 03:36 To: Aditya Nandakumar <proaditya at

I believe if you pass(iirc) -pass-remarks-missed=“gisel-*”, it’ll print the instruction it failed to legalize. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 11, 2017, at 6:44 PM, S. Bharadwaj Yadavalli via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Thanks for your quick reply. > > Here its is: > > =========== > > ; ModuleID = 'simple_foo.c' > source_filename

> On Nov 10, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 11/10/2017 11:12 AM, Amara Emerson via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> This RFC concerns the design and architecture of a generic machine instruction combiner/optimizer framework to be developed as part of the GISel pipeline. As we transition from

When writing MachineFunction unit tests, I find it quite tedious to verify correctness in C++. I would like to use FileCheck in UnitTests because FileCheck is extremely convenient/robust to verify correctness. In order to do so, I moved most of FileCheck’s implementation into a header (Support/FileCheck.h) and updated FileCheck.cpp to use this. I ran into this while writing some target agnostic

> On 2 Jul 2018, at 15:13, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I had similar gripes with unit testing machine function stuff. I personally would have preferred to create more tests based on a tool like llc rather than pushing more on the unit test side. Anyway I tried to push https://reviews.llvm.org/D48850 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D48850> in

Hi Renato, If Kristof is busy I can make runs on AArch64 Linux (Cortex-A53 and Cortex-57). Thanks, Evgeny Astigeevich Senior Compiler Engineer Compilation Tools ARM > -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > Renato Golin via llvm-dev > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 9:54 AM > To: Quentin Colombet > Cc: llvm-dev;

Thanks for your quick reply. Here its is: =========== ; ModuleID = 'simple_foo.c' source_filename = "simple_foo.c" target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0" ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind optnone ssp uwtable define i32 @foo(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c) #0 { entry: %retval = alloca i32, align

while # sudo nautilus i get this : root at static-16 aditya]# sudo nautilus No protocol specified Could not parse arguments: Cannot open display: [root at static-16 aditya]# please resolve. Also what does the "static-16" denote? -- -Aditya Mamidwar

Hi Stefanos, Thanks for your comments. I added both as reviewer. > One question though. Are you sure that this: > This helps with LICM when instructions inside a conditional is loop invariant  > is not achieved with the current LoopRotate pass? Because AFAIK, it does. Basically it inserts > a guard (that branches to the preheader) and then passes like LICM hoist invariant

I triend the command make all-gold -k But the error message that it says now is: /usr/binutils/gold/system.h:38:11:fatal error: 'libintl.h' file not found #include <libintl.h> On Saturday, May 30, 2015, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Aditya, > > Regarding the error, it looks like binutils is trying to build its > documentation. For

FYI, The LLVM Performance Workshop will be held at CGO 2017. The workshop is co-located with CC, HPCA, and PPoPP. If you are interested in attending the workshop, please register at the CGO website: http://cgo.org/cgo2017/workshops.html When: Saturday February 4th, 2017 Where: Austin, Texas, USA ---- Hi, CGO workshop and tutorial organizers, This is a friendly reminder that early

the symlink ld is already pointing to /usr/bin/ld. Also -fuse-ld=gold does not works on clang in freebsd. I am not sure where is the problem?should I remove /usr/bin/ld and create a new symlink to /usr/local/bin/ld.gold? Regards Aditya Verma Junior Undergraduate IDD Computer Sc & Engg IIT(BHU), Varanasi(UP) On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at

Dear Aditya, Regarding the error, it looks like binutils is trying to build its documentation. For your project, this is a step that you can skip. You can try using "make -k" to skip over errors and proceed to the "make install" step. That might work. As an aside, you should include the error as a plain text attachment instead of taking a graphic screenshot. The error

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:03 AM Aditya K via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The splitting pass currently doesn’t move cold symbols into a separate > section. Is that affecting your results? > Maybe partly, the main reason is that, in the absence of good profile > info, we aren't finding many cold blocks. > We noticed that the split cold functions

Hi, Thanks for the response. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:06 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > From what input? Usually Clang is the tool for "rewriting C" (making > source to source conversions), but it's not clear if that's what you are > trying to achieve, so some more information would be useful. > I have successfully generated AST

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 3:46 PM Vedant Kumar <vedant_kumar at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Teresa, > > On Feb 5, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:03 AM Aditya K via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > The splitting pass currently doesn’t

Dear all, When making a plot with the command plot(xVector, yVector), there are many points that collide on the same place in the plot. In order to make this plot clearer, I have been looking for a way to colour the points based on the number of points that fall onto each other. If only one point falls on a particular location, make it gray, if many points fall, make it black. I tried to search

Dear, How do I tell Emacs to update to the new R version I installed? It still loads the old R version. I already updated the the system path, but that didn't seem to work. Thanks for your help, Aditya -- Aditya Bhagwat [[alternative HTML version deleted]]