similar to: [LLVMdev] Running a pass during JIT

Hi, > Yes, they both are exactly the same. then I don't know what is going on. I suggest you send a copy of comb.ll to the list so that we can see for ourselves. Ciao, Duncan. > > Regards > > Shahzad > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> Hi, is the comb.ll used here: >> >> >>> $ time lli

Hi Yes, they both are exactly the same. Regards Shahzad On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, is the comb.ll used here: > > >> $ time lli ./comb.ll >> >> then the runtime is >> >> real    0m2.671s >> user    0m2.640s >> sys     0m0.020s >> >> But, if I convert this same file comb,ll

Hello I need some help here please. If we compile source files directly in to native code: $ clang -O3 -lm *.c then the runtime is like following real 0m2.807s user 0m2.784s sys 0m0.012s and If we emit LLVM bytcode and apply optimizations $ clang -O3 -c -emit-llvm *.c $ llvm-link *.o -o comb.ll $ time lli ./comb.ll then the runtime is real 0m2.671s user 0m2.640s sys 0m0.020s But, if I

Hi, is the comb.ll used here: > $ time lli ./comb.ll > > then the runtime is > > real 0m2.671s > user 0m2.640s > sys 0m0.020s > > But, if I convert this same file comb,ll in to native binary the same as the comb.ll used here: > $ clang comb.ll ? Ciao, Duncan. > > and execute it, then the runtime increases alot > > $ time ./a.out > > real

Thanks Duncan It was really helpful. Regards Abdul On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > >> If I compile the program using the following command line i.e. >> >> $ clang -O3 -lm *.c > > > this may be doing link time optimization. > > >> >> then >> >> $ time ./a.out >>

Sure. The comb.ll and data files are attached and can be invoked as the following $ lli comb.ll data -c Regards Shahzad On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > >> Yes, they both are exactly the same. > > > then I don't know what is going on.  I suggest you send a copy of comb.ll to > the > list so that we can

Hi, > If I compile the program using the following command line i.e. > > $ clang -O3 -lm *.c this may be doing link time optimization. > > then > > $ time ./a.out > > real 0m2.606s > user 0m2.584s > sys 0m0.012s > > BUT, if I use all the optimizations enabled with -O3 but specify them > explicity i.e. you can just use "opt -O3"

Hey, I have a situation where in I need to intercept a call to a particular function and return a pointer to a separate implementation of that function using JIT. The scenario is like this: 1. A test code or client code calls a function A() for which a dummy implementation is provided in a library which the test code/client links with during compilation. 2. I create the .bc using -emit-llvm and

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Kasra wrote: > > Hi, > > for some reason I could not get the machine code generator for x86 > working. The interpreter is the only thing that works, is there > anything that I am missing here? > > This recently changed.  In your main program, please

Hi all, I'm struggling to get lli work on qemu-system-arm. I already boot the system with a debian squeeze rootfs which contains a statically cross-compiled lli for armel. When I run ./lli hello.bc, I got the following error msg: ./lli: error creating EE: /lib/: cannot read file data: Is a directory afaik, this error is related to lli using dlopen() with a NULL path to resolve symbols for

On 5/7/2012 12:21 AM, Bendersky, Eli wrote: <snip> > > MCJIT is functional in trunk (and the 3.1 branch). While it doesn't include all the features of the old JIT quite yet, it's complete enough to pass all of JIT's execution tests on Linux and Mac OS X (no Windows yet). As for directions on how to enable it, follow the path of the "use-mcjit" flag passed to lli

> On 5/7/2012 12:21 AM, Bendersky, Eli wrote: > <snip> > > > > MCJIT is functional in trunk (and the 3.1 branch). While it doesn't include all > the features of the old JIT quite yet, it's complete enough to pass all of JIT's > execution tests on Linux and Mac OS X (no Windows yet). As for directions > on how to enable it, follow the path of the

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Heming Cui <heming at cs.columbia.edu> wrote: > Dear all, >      I hope you enjoy your christmas! Recently I started to play lli with > bc. I found that the lli only calls the main() function in bc file and then > does nothing before the main() function returns, which means that the > JIT::runFunction() function is involved only once with the

On Oct 28, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Warren Armstrong wrote: > Greetings, > > I have a plan to use LLVM to undertake runtime optimisation of > computational chemistry programs. Ok. > As part of this, I'd like to be able > to invoke lli and pass it a list of passes to run, in the manner of > opt. For example: > >> lli -load=llvm/mem_trace_pass/bin/lib/hello.so -hello

Dear all, I hope you enjoy your christmas! Recently I started to play lli with bc. I found that the lli only calls the main() function in bc file and then does nothing before the main() function returns, which means that the JIT::runFunction() function is involved only once with the main() function in bc file. If this was true, then lli does not have any control to the execution of program.

On 5/7/2012 10:17 PM, Bendersky, Eli wrote: <snip> >>> $lli -entry-function="ISimEngine_GetVersion" -use-mcjit libengine.bc >>> LLVM ERROR: Inline asm not supported by this streamer because we don't >>> have an asm parser for this target >> >> I also tried other variations of the call with the same result: >>> $lli

Just a quick question on LLVM, signals, and the lli interpreter. A sample program is included at the end. Platform is x86, Linux, 32-bit, GCC 4.2.4. Does lli -force-interpreter support signals, or is it only the JIT that does? The following sample program crashes with lli 2.5 and lli top-of-tree. Thanks and regards, Matt ============================= #include <stdio.h> #include

Hello, there are several optimization levels in lli like O0, O1, O2, O3. What does they mean? how the run time optimization is performed in LLVM JIT? I am working on a project where my goal is to study the impact of lli optimizations. here my IR is already optimized through opt. now i have to perform lli optimizations provided i am giving varying inputs at run time. so i suppose here my

Greetings, I have a plan to use LLVM to undertake runtime optimisation of computational chemistry programs. As part of this, I'd like to be able to invoke lli and pass it a list of passes to run, in the manner of opt. For example: > lli -load=llvm/mem_trace_pass/bin/lib/hello.so -hello ./my_bitcode.bc The current implementation of lli (updated from SVN as of three nights ago)

Hello, I'm trying to compile sqlite3 using llvm-gcc, then run it with lli. I've attached a Makefile and a main.c that simply invokes sqlite3_initialize(). You'll need to download sqlite3 (it was too big to attach) and copy main.c and the Makefile into the directory where sqlite3.c is [Link: sqlite-amalgamation-3_7_0_1.zip <http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-amalgamation-3_7_0_1.zip>