Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Rephrased: How to get function virtual starting address from MCSymbolRefExpr?"
2011 Nov 17
1
[LLVMdev] How to get ELF section virtual starting address from MCSymbolRefExpr?
I have a case where I the expression (MCSymbolRefExpr) is the offset from the beginning of the section.
The need is to combine that offset to the virtual address of the section it belongs, in this case .text, but it could be any section.
I can get a MCSectionELF class object from MCSymbol that I get from MCSymbolRefExpr:
int Kind = Value->getKind();
if (Kind == MCExpr::SymbolRef) {
2011 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] How to get ELF section virtual starting address from MCSymbolRefExpr?
Yeh, I eventually figured that out.
Thanks for responding though.
Jack
________________________________________
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:00 AM
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: LLVMdev Digest, Vol 89, Issue 47
Send LLVMdev mailing list
2007 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] Changing basic blocks
> I need a way to reorder instructions inside MachineBasicBlocks or
> MachineFunctions.
> I've been searching for it but I have not found an example in the code yet.
For MachineBasicBlocks, check out this doc:
http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1MachineBasicBlock.html
I believe its basically the same as basic blocks in that you can
manipulate the instruction list.
Otherwise, you
2007 Aug 09
4
[LLVMdev] Changing basic blocks
Hi Tanya and everybody,
Ty for your support.
I too believe it should not be complicated.
But I was not being able to do it.
For instance, I tried to run this code below:
BB->push_back(&(BB->front()));
BB->pop_front();
But it did not work (kinda obvious why).
Nor this:
BB->push_back(BB->begin());
BB->pop_front();
But also did not work. It seams the same
2016 Jan 11
0
Some llvm questions (for tgsi backend)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:07:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've
> added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program
> to something which sort of looks like tgsi.
>
> You can find my latest work on this here:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jwrdegoede/llvm
>
2015 Aug 20
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
On 08/19/2015 07:54 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
>>> Clarify general description of the mac, status and
>>> max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is
>>> vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of
2015 Aug 17
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
> Clarify general description of the mac, status and
> max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is
> vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of
> the fields are non valid.
>
> Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two
> different feature flags.
>
> Signed-off-by:
2015 Aug 19
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
> > Clarify general description of the mac, status and
> > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is
> > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of
> > the fields are non valid.
> >
> > Also
2015 Aug 19
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
> > Clarify general description of the mac, status and
> > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is
> > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of
> > the fields are non valid.
> >
> > Also
2015 Aug 16
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
Clarify general description of the mac, status and
max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is
vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of
the fields are non valid.
Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two
different feature flags.
Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork at redhat.com>
---
content.tex | 42
2016 Jan 12
1
Some llvm questions (for tgsi backend)
Hi Tom,
Thanks for taking the time to answer this.
On 11-01-16 18:10, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:07:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've
>> added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program
>> to something which sort of looks like