similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0 Release about X86

I know pc-lint is working fine on detecting some nasty coding fault. But is it illegal implement it in clang? And also there is so much other tools for code analyze:) 2010/3/26, yiqiuping1986 <yiqiuping1986 at 126.com>: > 呵呵，不急，还有一学期的时间。 > > > 2010-03-26 > > > > yiqiuping1986 > > > > 发件人： 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) > 发送时间： 2010-03-26 15:05:33 > 收件人：

For example, ELF.h MachO.h and COFF.h should moved into Object directory with new name. and Dwarf.h should moved into DebugInfo directory. 2013/6/29 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>: > Where would you like to move them? > > -eric > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:38 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) > <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: >> From my point of view, the

Hi, I intend to participate in Google's Summer of Code this year, so I'd like to bounce another idea around to see what you guys think. (I posted a similar message to cfe-dev just now.) Be warned: this will shock you. It may even horrify you. 1. Implement a 16-bit x86 backend. (*Chris recoils in horror*) Yeah, I know 16-bit x86 is dead, but I find it interesting for historical purposes

Going to be interesting layering issues if you do the latter. Then you have CodeGen depending upon DebugInfo instead of just a header in Support. -eric On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:08 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: > For example, > ELF.h MachO.h and COFF.h > should moved into Object directory with new name. > and Dwarf.h should moved into DebugInfo

Well, is that possible to include libstdc++4.7 into llvm? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry if I was unclear, I have no problems building clang against a newer > gcc for my own purpose. But it doesn't make sense to provide a release > binary for clang that's hosted on llvm.org that's ostensibly for >

>From my point of view, the Support library should be more pure. And should not contains too much LLVM-related APIs and defines, -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo

It is possible to statically link against libstdc++, yes. I don't quite know all the pieces to the recipe in order to get that to work. It would require changes to the release script in order to get those configuration changes all the way through the third phase build. I don't believe any other tarball release does this, so it would at least be an unconventional release. On Wed, Jun

Hi, I'm trying to get the llvm-test suite going on Fedora Core 5 and I have a number of failures with the current HEAD. The major one (see PR879) has a workaround. Now, I'm getting a conflict in the CBakcned while compiling siod (and others): gcc Output/siod.cbe.c -lm -ldl -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -o Output/siod.cbe Output/siod.cbe.c:471: error: conflicting types for

Hello, Duncan. > 3-fortran.diff > Get fortran to compile: use the common stubs and rip out > the incomplete collection of dummy routines someone already put in. > With this patch, the fortran build dies at this point: > > cc1: llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAG.cpp:367: void llvm::ScheduleDAG::AddOperand(llvm: > :MachineInstr*, llvm::SDOperand, unsigned int, const

I means visual studio c++ 2008, do you build clang+llvm with .sln files, and these files are generated by cmake? I do of that. And because vs c++ can't recognize path such a:/filepath/.. Properlyn it's recognized as a:/filepath So we need change /.. to /../ or /../. 2009/8/6, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>: > I don't understand this problem, I have built clang on

2013/10/19 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>: > On 19 October 2013 06:01, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: >> I found that access llvm-mc from clang driver is impossible, and I >> want to use llvm-mc to compile assembly files, how to do that? > > Try "clang -integrated-as -c test.s" Thank you very much, I use the

-- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161115/80fd3c17/attachment.html>

I'm able to receive but not make calls with zaptel using an X101P connecting to Asterisk with an Xlite client. My client has context = flat in sip.conf and extensions number 8919 In extensions.conf I've got: [home] ; Line 1 ; exten => 8919,1,Dial(${PHONES1},20,Ttm) exten => 8919,2,Macro(vmessage,${PHONES1VM}) exten => 8919,3,Hangup [outgoing] exten =>

Hell, Brian, I found a way to install Gcc 5.3 on CentOS 6 without the need to building it from source. You may try it on CentOS 6.0 That's makes clang/llvm won't depends on the newer version of glibc 2.14 The instruction: vim /etc/yum.repos.d/llvm.repo The content: ``` [sclo] name=SCLO baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/sclo/x86_64/rh/ gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 ``` Installation step:

So CentOS before 6.7 is not an option after all? Is that possible to use clang on CentOS 6.6 and before? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7. I wanted to build it > against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer > libstdc++. > > Sorry, it would be clearer

[root at localhost clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6]# cd bin [root at localhost bin]# ./clang ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6:

I can confirm I get the same behavior, and that's a real bug. If you use --target=i686-pc-win32, you get COFF, and that should be a good workaround for now. There must be a conditional somewhere that isn't handling mingw correctly. On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:58 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com>wrote: > 2013/10/19 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at

Where would you like to move them? -eric On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:38 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: > From my point of view, the Support library should be more pure. And > should not contains > too much LLVM-related APIs and defines, > -- > 此致 > 礼 > 罗勇刚 > Yours > sincerely, > Yonggang Luo > >

Is there anyone get the time to apply this patch? 2009/10/2, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com>: > > On Oct 1, 2009, at 6:36 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > >> At the first glance, it's coming with that c-index-test is just >> only containing c files (without cpp(cxx,c++) files). >> >> So cmake recognize it as pure C project, >> and so it's

Cause llvm-libc are in early stage, and we can easily catch up the support with linux. After we add wasi support in llvm-lic, we can easily get a usable llvm-libc across different platform such as linux/windows/macos/android. don't know if iOS is a target, but these target are very much enough -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An