similar to: [LLVMdev] Whither /Support/StandardPasses.h?

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:53 AM, George Giorgidze <giorgidze at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Erick, > > Can you make the following functions available in llvm-c. > > createStandardFunctionPasses > createStandardModulePasses > createStandardLTOPasses > > Thanks in advance, George This is a little tricky, so I need some advice from the community. First off, I'm

Erick Tryzelaar <erick.tryzelaar <at> gmail.com> writes: > > I've pretty much finished exposing all I wanted to llvm-c and the > ocaml bindings for the soon to be released 2.7. Does anyone need any > other functions exposed before the code freeze on the 7th? > Hi Erick, Can you make the following functions available in llvm-c. createStandardFunctionPasses

I've pretty much finished exposing all I wanted to llvm-c and the ocaml bindings for the soon to be released 2.7. Does anyone need any other functions exposed before the code freeze on the 7th?

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Peter Zion <peter.zion at fabric-engine.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to modify my LLVM-based compiler to perform an initial, no-optimization compilation synchronously on startup and then perform an asynchronous, optimized recompilation in the background, and I am getting in one of the optimization passes. > > - I am using the official

Hello, I am trying to modify my LLVM-based compiler to perform an initial, no-optimization compilation synchronously on startup and then perform an asynchronous, optimized recompilation in the background, and I am getting in one of the optimization passes. - I am using the official release of LLVM 2.8 - I have compiled LLVM with threading enabled; I am running llvm::llvm_start_multithreaded() on

The opt tool uses two helpers to run passes: createStandardFunctionPasses and createStandardModulePasses. How were the passes to be instantiated by each function chosen? There are some FunctionPasses instantiated by createStandardModulePasses which is a bit counterintuitive. I see that all passes added by the user on the command line are added to "Passes" in opt, meaning they're

Thanks. The reason I ask is because I'm looking at some code that does just that. A single FunctionPassManager is constructed with a dummy Module and createStandardFunctionPasses is called on it. The FunctionPassManager cached and run on Functions in other Modules. So far I haven't noticed any problems but I guess that is because the passes added by createStandardFunctionPasses don't

On Feb 24, 2011, at 8:14 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > >>> class CodeGenOpt { >>> ... >>> public >>> getOptLevel() ...; >>> getFPLevel() ...; >>> getMemLevel() ...; >>> }; >>> >>> Does this sound reasonable? >> >> I don't think that this is

Look I have written a PRE pass. opt is running that pass. I have included my pass name there in include/llvm/Support/StandardPasses.h file. To do that, I have got some error. Because it also requires the definition of the pass in some other file also. I observed how gvn pre pass is added to the pass list. I had followed the same way, but failed. Cna you kindly tell what needs to be done in this

Soumya_Prasad_Ukil wrote: > Look I have written a PRE pass. opt is running that pass. I have > included my pass name there in include/llvm/Support/StandardPasses.h > file. To do that, I have got some error. Because it also requires the > definition of the pass in some other file also. I observed how gvn pre > pass is added to the pass list. I had followed the same way, but failed.

Soumya_Prasad_Ukil wrote: > Pls help. You didn't say what was actually running the passes. (llvm-gcc? clang? opt -some -passes?) What you probably want is to modify one of the lists in include/llvm/Support/StandardPasses.h. Nick > > On 21 August 2010 17:32, Soumya_Prasad_Ukil <ukil.soumya at gmail.com > <mailto:ukil.soumya at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I have

On Apr 18, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Hi all, > > we're working on compile-time instrumentation for ThreadSanitizer (a > data race detector, see http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test and > http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/wiki/CompileTimeInstrumentation), > which is implemented as an opt plugin that is ran for each client > C/C++ module we

Larry, On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Larry Gritz <lg at larrygritz.com> wrote: > I have a whole slew of questions about optimization passes. Answers to any > or all would be extremely helpful: > > How important are doInitialization/doFinalization? Most of the passes do not use them. > I can't detect any difference if I use them or not. Say, if you are writing

Eli Friedman <eli.friedman <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> > I did not mention in the original email (and should have) that OSR needs > >> > -instcombine to be run after it for cleanup. Also -licm, -reassociate, -gvn > >> > and -sccp can be enabling optimizations for OSR. > >> > >> Hmm... perhaps that could be partially fixed

I have a whole slew of questions about optimization passes. Answers to any or all would be extremely helpful: How important are doInitialization/doFinalization? I can't detect any difference if I use them or not. Why does the function pass manager have doInitialization/doFinalization, but the global pass manager doesn't? If I am applying the function passes to many functions, do I

While going through the header file llvm/Support/StandardPasses.h in support of some LLVM bindings that I have been working on I noticed that some passes are not exposed in the LLVM C bindings. Attached is a patch that adds the following passes the the C bindings: LLVMAddIPSCCPPass LLVMAddInternalizePass I can commit this patch once someone gives me the go ahead. -------------- next part

Anyone know where the sources for app_nv_faxdetect officially live? I couldn't turn them up on a web search, just patched versions for 1.4, etc. Thanks.

From my reading of the Linux Kernel mailing list, it seems that the LM87 sensor driver made it into kernel 2.6.8. Anyone know why it is not present in the RHEL4/Centos4.2 current kernel? Thanks.

I have rpmfusion set up, but yum tells me that mplayerplug-in is not available. Has it been replaced by something else? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

Looking at epel-testing, while libguestfs-* 1.0.57-2 is available, virt-inspector does not appear to be. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libguestfs/EL-5/libguestfs.spec?view=markup shows the virt-inspector bits commented out, and http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libguestfs/EL-5/libguestfs.spec?view=log doesn't appear to have an explanation. Wuzzup? :)