similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM Dev Meeting - Testing BoF Volunteer

We are looking for a volunteer to lead a Testing BoF at next month's LLVM Dev Meeting. Testing was a popular topic in the responses to the LLVM Dev Meeting registration questionnaire. It also seems to be a recent theme on LLVMdev. A Testing BoF should seek to better describe the issues, identify any interest or actual work in addressing the issues, and foster potential collaboration.

On Sep 15, 2011, at 10:07 AM, John McCall wrote: > On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Kipping, David wrote: >> Apologies for the limitations of the registration system. >> >> - No email is sent upon completion >> >> - If you get a page at the end that says you successfully registered, then you are good to go >> >> - There have been a few reported cases of

Apologies for the limitations of the registration system. - No email is sent upon completion - If you get a page at the end that says you successfully registered, then you are good to go - There have been a few reported cases of the registration page hanging, if so try another browser such as Firefox. If you have questions mail me directly (dkipping at qualcomm.com). If the group wants, I can

On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Kipping, David wrote: > Apologies for the limitations of the registration system. > > - No email is sent upon completion > > - If you get a page at the end that says you successfully registered, then you are good to go > > - There have been a few reported cases of the registration page hanging, if so try another browser such as Firefox. >

On Sep 15, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 10:07 AM, John McCall wrote: > >> On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Kipping, David wrote: >>> Apologies for the limitations of the registration system. >>> >>> - No email is sent upon completion >>> >>> - If you get a page at the end that says you successfully

On 31 July 2012 14:18, Kipping, David <dkipping at qualcomm.com> wrote: > First Thursday in August is this Thursday – will the Bay Area social > going to take place that day? > Tomorrow has a couple conflicts with sports events (a Giants game and an A's game). Thursday the 9th there's another Giants game but nothing else. Let's hold it then. Sorry for the

Next bay-area social is this week! Thursday August 9th at St. Stephens Green! Come socialize, try to recruit patch reviewers with beer, or just talk about any subject management hasn't asked you not to. Just like every llvm social! If you wouldn't mind RSVP'ing on http://llvmbayarea.appspot.com , that will help me get us the right sized space at the restaurant. Looking forward to

Thanks for pointing this out. Let's hold the July one on the 12th. On 25 June 2012 13:34, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Kipping, David <dkipping at qualcomm.com>wrote: > >> Will the Bay Area LLVM Social take place on July 5 (first Thursday), >> or be rescheduled because adjacent to the July 4 holiday?

On 25 June 2012 13:40, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out. Let's hold the July one on the 12th. > As advertised, this month's meeting will be held this Thursday, at St. Stephens Green! As usual the details and RSVP are up on http://llvmbayarea.appspot.com . Looking forward to seeing everyone there! Nick On 25 June 2012 13:34,

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Kipping, David <dkipping at qualcomm.com>wrote: > Will the Bay Area LLVM Social take place on July 5 (first Thursday), or > be rescheduled because adjacent to the July 4 holiday? > FWIW, I'm fine rescheduling it, but let's see what the maestro says. > **** > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers

The BOF in the subject line is a "Birds Of a Feather" meeting. This is a chance for people who normally only get the chance to communicate via e-mail to actually sit down and talk to each other in person. I plan to be at the Joint Statistical Meetings in Dallas in August. If you will be attending and would be interested in getting together with some other R folks, please e-mail me and

Fifth Annual LLVM Developers' Meeting November 18, 2011 San Jose, CA ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2011 Developers’ Meeting Announcement ---------------------------------------------------------------- The fifth annual LLVM Developers' Meeting will be held on November 18, 2011 in San

Dear all, please find below the meeting notes form the Polly BoF (as taken by Michael Kruse). Comments and feedback is very much appreciated. Best, Tobias Status update * Polly late in pipeline * Uses TargetTransformInfo * Part of the release process * isl: C++ interface, MIT licenced, improved scheduler * Polly integration plan; result: isl and Polly available in each build * Better

Fifth Annual LLVM Developers' Meeting November 18, 2011 San Jose, CA ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2011 Developers’ Meeting Announcement ---------------------------------------------------------------- The fifth annual LLVM Developers' Meeting will be held on November 18, 2011 in San

We are in desperate need of volunteers to moderate the sessions during the LLVM Developers Meeting. If you are attending and can act as moderator for a group of talks, please let us know. We need 5 more volunteers to moderate the following sessions. Please note your first choice session to moderate and your second choice: Session #1 (11:05-12:35): Integrating LLVM into FreeBSD: Brooks Davis –

Mike Edwards and I will be hosting a talk/BOF called "Living Downstream Without Drowning" which is for anyone maintaining a bunch of local changes to Clang/LLVM/etc. We will present some procedures and tactics we've evolved at Sony, including patch tactics for reducing merge pain, and how we are throwing automation at the problem. But we are really curious what YOU have done

On 2 August 2014 00:40, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > If memory serves me well (it doesn't), these are the list of things we > agreed on making, and their progress: > > 1. Performance-specific test-suite: a group of specific benchmarks > that should be tracked with the LNT infrastructure. Hal proposed to > look at this, but other people helped

Sanjoy, Joseph, and I will be hosting a BoF on using LLVM to build compilers for managed languages. We're curious to hear who's planning on attending and what topics you'd like to hear about. Depending on the expected audience, we're happy to do anything between a rough "what to expect getting started" to a down in the weeds working session on relevant optimization

Hi Geoff, I have only encountered one problem. If a static library has not been > compiled with -fPIC and uses symbols from a shared library, LLJIT does not > complain, but the code may crash without warning when it is executed. Was the static library compiled with large code model too? I think this is probably a RuntimeDyld bug: It's not great at error reporting. A few people in the

Unique to this year's Developer Meeting, we will have Birds-of-a- Feather sessions (BOFs) that will coincide with the talks. For those unfamiliar with BOFs, these are attendee organized meetings for people to meet, exchange ideas, and share information on a variety of topics. BOF slots will be 40 minutes long. BOFs will be printed on the official schedule and be put on the website so