similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM Dev Meeting - Testing BoF Volunteer

I can do this, if nobody has volunteered yet. Cheers, Andrei On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Kipping, David <dkipping at qualcomm.com> wrote: > We are looking for a volunteer to lead a Testing BoF at next month's LLVM > Dev Meeting. Testing was a popular topic in the responses to the LLVM Dev > Meeting registration questionnaire. It also seems to be a recent theme on >

We are in desperate need of volunteers to moderate the sessions during the LLVM Developers Meeting. If you are attending and can act as moderator for a group of talks, please let us know. We need 5 more volunteers to moderate the following sessions. Please note your first choice session to moderate and your second choice: Session #1 (11:05-12:35): Integrating LLVM into FreeBSD: Brooks Davis –

The BOF in the subject line is a "Birds Of a Feather" meeting. This is a chance for people who normally only get the chance to communicate via e-mail to actually sit down and talk to each other in person. I plan to be at the Joint Statistical Meetings in Dallas in August. If you will be attending and would be interested in getting together with some other R folks, please e-mail me and

Hi, Next week at the developers meeting, I'm chairing a BoF session on improving our performance tracking and benchmarking infrastructure. I'd like to make the most out of the 45 minute slot. Therefore, I'd like to start the discussion a bit earlier here, giving everyone who can't come to the BoF a chance to put in their 2 cents. At the same time, I hope this will also give me a

Dear all, please find below the meeting notes form the Polly BoF (as taken by Michael Kruse). Comments and feedback is very much appreciated. Best, Tobias Status update * Polly late in pipeline * Uses TargetTransformInfo * Part of the release process * isl: C++ interface, MIT licenced, improved scheduler * Polly integration plan; result: isl and Polly available in each build * Better

Hi All, I've listed the current topics of interest below, along with some notes on each. We only have 30 minutes so we'll barely scratch the surface of these during the BoF itself. My main aims are for you to meet each other, identify potential areas of collaboration, identify things that I can do to unblock you, and get the ball rolling on some conversations that we can continue on the

Folks, Next Thursday evening (20 July) we''ll be holding a "Xen Users BOF" at the Ottawa Linux Symposium. >From the BOF description: "The Xen Users'' BOF will provide an interactive forum for users to talk about their experiences with Xen and highlight some of the cool configurations they have created with it. This will also be an opportunity for newcomers to

Folks, Next Thursday evening (20 July) we''ll be holding a "Xen Users BOF" at the Ottawa Linux Symposium. >From the BOF description: "The Xen Users'' BOF will provide an interactive forum for users to talk about their experiences with Xen and highlight some of the cool configurations they have created with it. This will also be an opportunity for newcomers to

Folks, Is there any interest in having a BoF session on the GCC+LLVM collaboration? I'd like to discuss some of the outcomes from the GNU Cauldron session and see what we could do to make that relationship healthier. So far, all the cross discussions I've seen on the GNU list (about LLVM) have been very healthy and the GNU folks seem very receptive to discussion (not so much for

Mike Edwards and I will be hosting a talk/BOF called "Living Downstream Without Drowning" which is for anyone maintaining a bunch of local changes to Clang/LLVM/etc. We will present some procedures and tactics we've evolved at Sony, including patch tactics for reducing merge pain, and how we are throwing automation at the problem. But we are really curious what YOU have done

On 2 August 2014 00:40, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > If memory serves me well (it doesn't), these are the list of things we > agreed on making, and their progress: > > 1. Performance-specific test-suite: a group of specific benchmarks > that should be tracked with the LNT infrastructure. Hal proposed to > look at this, but other people helped

Apologies for the limitations of the registration system. - No email is sent upon completion - If you get a page at the end that says you successfully registered, then you are good to go - There have been a few reported cases of the registration page hanging, if so try another browser such as Firefox. If you have questions mail me directly (dkipping at qualcomm.com). If the group wants, I can

Sanjoy, Joseph, and I will be hosting a BoF on using LLVM to build compilers for managed languages. We're curious to hear who's planning on attending and what topics you'd like to hear about. Depending on the expected audience, we're happy to do anything between a rough "what to expect getting started" to a down in the weeds working session on relevant optimization

Hi Geoff, I have only encountered one problem. If a static library has not been > compiled with -fPIC and uses symbols from a shared library, LLJIT does not > complain, but the code may crash without warning when it is executed. Was the static library compiled with large code model too? I think this is probably a RuntimeDyld bug: It's not great at error reporting. A few people in the

Unique to this year's Developer Meeting, we will have Birds-of-a- Feather sessions (BOFs) that will coincide with the talks. For those unfamiliar with BOFs, these are attendee organized meetings for people to meet, exchange ideas, and share information on a variety of topics. BOF slots will be 40 minutes long. BOFs will be printed on the official schedule and be put on the website so

At this year's Developer Meeting, we will have Birds-of-a-Feather sessions (BOFs) that will coincide with the talks. For those unfamiliar with BOFs, these are attendee organized meetings for people to meet, exchange ideas, and share information on a variety of topics. BOF slots will be 40 minutes long. BOFs will be printed on the official schedule and be put on the website so attendees can

On Sep 15, 2011, at 10:07 AM, John McCall wrote: > On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Kipping, David wrote: >> Apologies for the limitations of the registration system. >> >> - No email is sent upon completion >> >> - If you get a page at the end that says you successfully registered, then you are good to go >> >> - There have been a few reported cases of

On 20 August 2014 00:24, Gerolf Hoflehner <ghoflehner at apple.com> wrote: > My experience from leading BOFs at other conferences is more talk than action. So I suggest a different setup for this topic: how about having a working group meeting with participants who can commit time to work on this topic? Mine too, but in this case I have to say it wasn't at all what happened. It

Hello, I have scheduled a birds-of-a-feather (BoF) meeting at BSDcon to discuss the FreeBSD Security Officer role. Details such as time, location, and topics are posted on the BSDcon unofficial Wiki <URL: http://bsdcon.kwiki.org/index.cgi?FreeBSDSecurityOfficerBoF >. Please attend if you are interested in what the SO team does currently and in participating in and improving its

Hi Geoff, Importing symbols into the JIT from an object file or static library...? Sure! Are you interested in doing this with the C API, LLJIT, or raw OrcV2 components? The high-level answer here (which we can dig into further in the BoF) is: For object files: - For raw OrcV2 components you'll want to create an RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer or ObjectLinkingLayer and use the 'add'