similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM / Clang 3.0 rc1 Binaries Available

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 09:51, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find > them here: > > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ > > Please download them, build them, and compile things to your heart's > content. And most importantly file a bunch of bug reports. :-) > > Share and

> Test suite is green but I'm seeing two libc++ test failures when running check-all. What tests are failing? On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Nikola Smiljanic via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Uploaded Fedora and openSUSE binaries. Test suite is green but I'm seeing > two libc++ test failures when running check-all. I'm pretty sure these were >

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:41, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 09:51, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find >> them here: >> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ >> >> Please download them, build them, and

clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz The second test run finally finished (the machine lacks an FPU). All good. ________________________________________ From: Daniel Sanders Sent: 28 June 2015 18:51 To: Tom Stellard; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: RE: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed. clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz All good

Hi, I had a quick look at that link and it seems to be a linker internal error. Presumably we're triggering a bug in the system toolchain. FWIW, my mipsel build on a Debian Jessie machine (binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1) successfully completed test-release.sh. I'm currently running the tests. Here's the relevant bit of the log from your link: cd

There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find them here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ Please download them, build them, and compile things to your heart's content. And most importantly file a bunch of bug reports. :-) Share and enjoy! -bw

On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > On 2011-03-14 18:14, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> Hello Xerxes, >> >>> llvm 2.9rc1 test on Dualcore ARM running Ubuntu Natty >> What is the gcc used for the compilation? Can you try to do the -O0 >> build and see whether this changed the stuff? >> > > xranby at panda:/media/dh0/llvm-2.9-build-O0$

On 24 Jun 2015, at 22:29, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: >>>> I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can

On 28/03/2018 07:19, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged 5.0.2-rc1, so testing can begin. LLVM_VERSION_PATCH is set to "1". Is that normal? (I was expecting "2"). http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_502/rc1/CMakeLists.txt?revision=328512&view=markup#29 Thanks Sylvestre

Source and binaries for LLVM-3.9.0-rc1 are now available at http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.9.0/#rc1 Please try it out, run tests, build your favourite projects, and *file bugs* about anything that doesn't work and needs to be fixed for the release. Please CC me on any findings. Thanks, Hans

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:38 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I was just trying to push a release note about DWARF v5 support. I did: > git checkout release_70 # in the monorepo > git commit <update to llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst> > git llvm push > but that fails. How do you want to do release notes? I'm not familiar with "git

Will the PR's marked as blockers of PR36649 be merged in or do we need to do something specific? On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:28 AM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just tagged the 6.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may begin testing and > uploading > binaries. Also, any tester who has not tested 5.0.2-rc1 and would like to >

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 3 Aug 2018, at 13:37, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). >> >> It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the >> status is of the branch

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin. We can always use > > more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know. > > I had trouble building on Windows, getting errors in > AMDGPUGenSubtargetInfo.inc

Hi, I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin. We can always use more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know. -Tom

Hi, I've just tagged 7.1.0-rc1. Testers, please begin testing and reporting results. Thanks, Tom

On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > It's probably PR12517. > > Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH: > > $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH > RPATH >

Hi, I've tagged the 8.0.1-rc1 release. Testers, please begin testing and upload the binaries. If you still want to have a bug fix included in the 8.0.1 final release you have until June 6 to request a fix be backported to the releases/8.0 branch. To make a request, file a bug at bugs.llvm.org and put release-8.0.1 into the 'Blocks:' field. You can also use the

The CentOS team is happy to announce the availability of CentOS-4.0 (RC1) for x86_64. This product supports AMD Opteron, AMD Athlon64, AMD AthlonFX and Intel EM64T CPU based computers. A bittorent for the 4 CD binary installation set (in .iso format ) is available from: http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/x86_64/CentOS-4.0.rc1-x86_64-bin1to4.torrent The only way to download ISO's is

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:20 AM, <sebastian.dressler at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I uploaded > > c55199c92877ed068b2f7d1ece6b0bb4f121a63a clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc1-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz > > to SFTP. Thanks! > Testing was OK except for differences between phase 2 and 3 which I consider being not harmful (or even: usual). No problem with the build script