similar to: [LLVMdev] Inlining functions

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Gabriel Quadros <gquadrossilva at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > >     I am trying to use your inline pass, and I would like to know if it is > possible to remove a function from the bitcode file once it is inlined. > Basically, I try: > > $> opt -inline file2.bc > file2.in.bc > >     and I see that all the functions

On 14 Jan 2010, at 05:20, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> calls to _malloc and _free >> weren't being inlined (see example below). I'm not sure why (happens >> with or without -simplify-libcalls). So, the resulting .bc file from >> 'opt' contains live references to symbols that were in its input .bc, >> but for some reason it stripped them. > > Okay.

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Chuck Zhao <czhao at eecg.toronto.edu> wrote: >  LLVM (2.7 release version) provides 2 implementations for inlining > function callsites: > > - InlineSimple.cpp (-inline):               inline simple callsites > according to its cost analysis > - InlineAlways.cpp (-always-inline):  inline all callsites that are > marked with

Mark Muir wrote: > > On 13 Jan 2010, at 20:34, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> On 13 January 2010 12:05, Mark Muir <mark.i.r.muir at gmail.com >> <mailto:mark.i.r.muir at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> But... now there's a small problem with library calls. Symbols >> such as 'memset', 'malloc', etc. are being removed by

LLVM (2.7 release version) provides 2 implementations for inlining function callsites: - InlineSimple.cpp (-inline): inline simple callsites according to its cost analysis - InlineAlways.cpp (-always-inline): inline all callsites that are marked with "always_inline" attribute. They are both subclasses of Inline.cpp that assumes the function's definition (body) is

On 7/27/2010 12:40 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Chuck Zhao<czhao at eecg.toronto.edu> wrote: >> LLVM (2.7 release version) provides 2 implementations for inlining >> function callsites: >> >> - InlineSimple.cpp (-inline): inline simple callsites >> according to its cost analysis >> - InlineAlways.cpp

On 13 Jan 2010, at 16:43, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Mark Muir wrote: >> - Run the existing Clang tool on each source file, using -emit-llvm to generate a .bc file for each module. >> - Run llvm-link to merge them into a single .bc file. >> - Run llc to generate a complete machine assembly. >> >> However, with optimisations enabled, the resulting code is not as

On 13 Jan 2010, at 20:34, Nick Lewycky wrote: > On 13 January 2010 12:05, Mark Muir <mark.i.r.muir at gmail.com> wrote: > > But... now there's a small problem with library calls. Symbols such as 'memset', 'malloc', etc. are being removed by global dead code elimination. They are implemented in one of the bitcode modules that are linked together (implementations

This testscript creates reflinks to files on different subvolumes, overwrites the original files and reflinks, and moves reflinked files between subvolumes. Originally submitted as testcase 302, changes are made based on comments from Eric: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00231.html Two new common/rc functions used in this script (_require_cp_reflink and _verify_reflink) have been

On 6 janv. 2011, at 19:00, llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >> I'm using LLVM to JIT-compile the XL programming language. I've recently added a whole-program optimization phase that gives excellent results, but I noticed that the StripDeadPrototypesPass was removing all references to my runtime support functions. > > why is that a problem? Because I have pointers to

Hi, I am trying to use rsync for incremental backup and I am facing some issues. I would like to ask your help to understand what is going on and have the proper command line. 1) my goal is I the following folders: ./dest: file3.txt ./orig: file1.txt   file10.txt  file2.txt   file20.txt And I would like to have as incremental backup ./dest: backup      file1.txt     file2.txt  file3.txt

I have the following situation: file2 on remote host and file1 on localhost. file1 and file2 are mostly the same. Simply running rsync remotehost:file2 file2 will actually transfer the entire file. But I would like to use the factt that I have local file1 that is mostly similar to file2. I.e. how can I make rsync to use file1 as a reference while transferring file2? (cp file1 file2 locally and

Hi, all: My folders are organized in such a way: root ----branch1 ---------------A -----------------------file1.txt -----------------------file2.txt ---------------B -----------------------file1.txt -----------------------file2.txt ----branch2 ---------------A -----------------------file1.txt -----------------------file2.txt ---------------B -----------------------file1.txt

Hi everyone, I have a question for R code to merge. Say I have two dataframes: File1 is: V1 V2 V3 V4 1 100 101 name1 2 200 201 name2 2 300 301 name3 3 400 401 name4 3 500 501 name5 4 600 601 name6 4 700 701 name7 File2 is: V1 V2 V3 V4 1 50 55 p1 3 402 449 p2 4 550 650 p3 4 651 660

Hi everybody. I've just started learning about LLVM and didn't get too far studying the core. I couldn't find the solution to my problem (if it has one) in the mailing list or the source code. The problem is: how can I redefine a function that's been called already by some other function? Suppose I have 3 files, all compiled to bytecode through llvm-gcc (I think it could be clang

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Chuck Zhao <czhao at eecg.toronto.edu> wrote: > I don't, and the compiler doesn't neither, that is the problem, unless I do > hacking at compile time. > E.g.: > - put all such function's definitions into file1.c > - force to compile file1.c 1st. > - when compiling file2.c: >  . read file1.bc >  . attach to file2's

Is this working as designed or a samba bug? I am trying to chown ownership of a file in a samba share and it results in an error. cifstest6:~ # smbclient //cifstest8/smb8 -U root Enter root's password: Domain=[CIFSTEST8] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.0-GIT-e6a5f11-devel] smb: \> chown 65534 65534 file2 NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED chown file \file2 uid=65534, gid=65534 The share is thus

Hi Hal, Thanks for your hint! $ /opt/llvm-svn/bin/opt -S -internalize -internalize-public-api-list=main -globaldce hello3.ll -o hello3.dce.ll    it works :) But I argue that `main` Function should be inserted into ExternalNames by default: Index: lib/Transforms/IPO/Internalize.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/Transforms/IPO/Internalize.cpp 

Hi LLVM developers, $ cat hello.c #include <stdio.h> void foo() { } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {   for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {     printf("%d\n", i);   }   return 0; } $ /opt/llvm-svn/bin/clang --version Fedora clang version 6.0.0 (trunk 316308) (based on LLVM 6.0.0svn) Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /opt/llvm-svn/bin $

> From: Indunil Jayasooriya <indunil75 at gmail.com> > > > > > > [root at centos67 loop]# cat file1 > > > firstname1 > > > firstname2 > > > > > > [root at centos67 loop]# cat file2 > > > lastname1 > > > lastname2 > > > > > > I need a OUTPUT like this > > > > > > > > >