similar to: [LLVMdev] error in lib dependencies generated by llvm-config for 3.0

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] error in lib dependencies generated by llvm-config for 3.0"

2012 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] Need help reading the LLVM Buildbot results
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: > From r167602 and onwards I get a fail in 'make check-all' for llvm+clang, > built with gcc-4.7.1 (but not with clang-3.1) on Linux x86_64: > > Failing Tests (1): > Clang :: CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates.cpp > > clang:
2004 Nov 23
0
problem setting up dfs
Hi, I'm trying to set up msdfs on FreeBSD 4.10 with samba 3.08. The clients I use are WinXp (sp1) and the desktop browser on RedHat ES3. Problems described beneath are identical for both clients. I tried to follow the howto as precisely as possible to not into problems, however, I did... In /export/dfsroot I made a link msdfs:strsvr01\part0 . I made sure everything is in lower case.
2012 Nov 10
6
[LLVMdev] Need help reading the LLVM Buildbot results
>From r167602 and onwards I get a fail in 'make check-all' for llvm+clang, built with gcc-4.7.1 (but not with clang-3.1) on Linux x86_64: Failing Tests (1): Clang :: CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates.cpp clang: /dev/shm/uabpath/master/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:208: typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X =
2007 Oct 23
0
stat() - Interrupted system call
I'm using samba 3.0.25a on a Solaris 9 box with separate W2K and XP clients accessing a share. The issue I'm having is that not all files appear in folder listings via Explorer/DOS windows on the XP client. This only happens when an app on the W2K side is simulateously accessing/creating files on the same share but not neccessarily in the same folder. I've since run samba in top
2007 Jan 10
0
winxp client - directory listing fails
Hello All, I'm having problems accessing getting a directory listing from samba(3.0.23d) with win xp clients. I can mount a share from win xp, create a directory, create a file, edit the file, etc. But listing the directory contents is fickle. If its a very small directory things appear to work fine. But a directory with around 30 files seems to hang and eventually returns "File Not
2005 Jun 14
4
Missing files on Windows client side.
In a directory with approximately 6000 files, several files are missing on the Windows side. If I check the directory on Unix (AIX) they are all there. As far as I can see there's nothing strange with this files en I can't see any connection between the missing files. It looks like it's randomly. A few examples of missing files: FAKTREF.10062005.16 (See debug information)
2006 Aug 03
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm under cygwin
Hello Anton Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:38:54 +0400 you wrote: > I've updated it yesterday and rebuilt - llvm built fine. But when > building llvm-gcc4 (also updated yesterday from new /trunk > directory) it fails with the same error. You might easily get llvm-gcc4-mingw32 binaries from "prerelease" directory. Since stdcall, fastcall & dllimport stuff is unsupported right now,
2006 Jan 31
0
Samba 3 and german umlaute in filenames/ can not delete or rename files or dirs
Hello, i habe an Sama 3 Server with some shares. If I access these shares from Windows and if I generate new files or dirs with german umlaute everythink is OK. I can open theses files and I can open the directory. If I want do delete or rename the files or dirs with german umlaute I got an error message. "I can not read the file from source". creating new dirptr 256 for path
2009 Jun 14
0
ctdb, samba and WINS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm in the progress of setting up clustered samba with ctdb. Samba is ADS-member server. WINS server is configured on two of our 2003-servers. When samba runs for a couple of hours I checked the WINS servers and saw that samba/nmbd registrred only the private interface addresses (192.168.1.x) and not the public interfaces (10.0.0.41,42).
2011 Dec 12
3
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
Hi folks, I just committed a new backend for the Hexagon processor. After committing, I was able to successfully check out, build and test with the new changes. The x86_64 build on the buildbot is failing, however. Here's the build error: llvm[2]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable llvm-mc /home/baldrick/osuosl/slave/llvm-x86_64/llvm/tools/llvm-mc/Debug+Asserts/llvm-mc.o: In function
2011 Dec 12
0
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: > Hi folks, > > I just committed a new backend for the Hexagon processor. After committing, I was able to successfully check out, build and test with the new changes. The x86_64 build on the buildbot is failing, however. Here's the build error: > > llvm[2]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable llvm-mc >
2015 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] Add a backend
Yes, llvm::InitializeAllTargetMCs(void) does seem to be autogenerated. It is _LLVMInitializeFooTargetMC that I can't find documented anywhere. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > This function is autogenerated. You need also to change top-level > configure / cmake files. > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Daniel
2011 Dec 12
0
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: > On 12/12/2011 4:28 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> >> >> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I just committed a new backend for the Hexagon processor. After committing, I was able to successfully check out, build and test with the new changes.
2011 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
On 12/12/2011 4:28 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I just committed a new backend for the Hexagon processor. After >> committing, I was able to successfully check out, build and test with >> the new changes. The x86_64 build on the buildbot is failing, >> however.
2004 Apr 20
0
samba locking problem
Hi, we have a strange samba locking problem with version 3.0. Sometimes user only get a read only access to files. This happens with different users on different clients. Unix permissions are OK. I have realy no idea. Can you help ? Thanx Peter Huber -------------- next part -------------- [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(217) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0)
2011 Dec 12
0
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
On 12/12/2011 4:49 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> >> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: >> >>> On 12/12/2011 4:28 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >>>> >>>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi folks,
2011 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Trouble using the MCJIT: "Target does not support MC emission" error
Hi Matt, hi Bruno, I am still struggling to use AVX via MCJIT on TOT... did you succeed yet? I seem to be unable to even get lli to run some code with the "use-mcjit" flag. I attached a test case that works fine for "lli y.bc" but exits with an error for "lli -use-mcjit y.bc": "LLVM ERROR: Unknown object format" If I call InitializeAllTargetMCs() before
2011 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: > >> On 12/12/2011 4:28 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: >>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> I just committed a new backend for the Hexagon
2015 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] Add a backend
Is there documentation somewhere about exactly what the function is supposed to do, or do I have to figure it out from existing examples? On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > You have to provide this function and initialize the whole MC > infrastructure. > > See e.g. lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMMCTargetDesc.cpp > >
2011 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure
I'm hitting this. Is there ETA for the fix? Evan On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Tony Linthicum wrote: > >> On 12/12/2011 4:49 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:36