similar to: [LLVMdev] Reminder: LLVM 3.0 Branching Friday!

Hi Bill, > As of this writing, we have: > > • several test failures on llvm-gcc self-host: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-gcc-i386-linux-selfhost/builds/25 I can reproduce this here. I'll poke at it this weekend sometime. > • a miscompile in one of the llvm-gcc testers: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-x86_64-linux-checks/builds/55 > >

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: > This is just a reminder to say that we will be branching for the LLVM 3.0 release Friday! > > 07:00:00 p.m. Friday October 14, 2011 PDT > 02:00:00 a.m. Saturday October 15, 2011 GMT Hi Bill, I have some pending patches for 3.0 only. Will you be sending out an announcement when the split is finished and such patches can be

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > I have some pending patches for 3.0 only. Of course I meant post-3.0 only. -Dave

On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> I have some pending patches for 3.0 only. > > Of course I meant post-3.0 only. > Yes, I'll send out a message when it's okay to submit post-3.0 patches. -bw

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/37730/ is an example of the ICE when D64146/rL370584 landed. On 01/09/2019 02:23, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > >> On Aug 31, 2019, at 15:14, Nandor Licker via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hello PowerPC fans, >> >> I am attempting to land D64146 and the PowerPC

Hi, Anyone knows what's going on with SVN? http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15 http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15 http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost-neon http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh etc. svn: E175012: Connection

Folks, It seems we got the same issue with Clang alignment as before: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost/builds/3025 http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost-neon/builds/485 http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh/builds/118 Commits between 231213 and 231255. There are a few issues that could have brought it: *

Hi Richard, Marco, I noticed that you two are the remaining bot owners using the `getClangBuildFactory` from `ClangBuilder`. All the other bots using that builder have moved to the new `getClangCMakeBuildFactory`, including Windows ones. Given that they do similar functionalities, I'd like to encourage you to move to the new factory, so that we can simplify the builder's code. Thanks!

Hi Andrew, it looks like your commit r139842 | atrick | 2011-09-15 22:58:37 +0200 (Thu, 15 Sep 2011) | 2 lines Reapply r139759. Disable IV rewriting by default. See PR10916. broke this buildbot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-x86_64-linux-checks The failure is a bootstrap failure of llvm-gcc when comparing object files from stages 2 and 3 (which don't match). I was able

I threw all the sanitizers I had access to on this test and didn't find anything. The merging uses threads so I can't rule out nondeterminism. It's strange that it only happens on ppc64le and only on stage 2, so an actual miscompile wouldn't surprise me either. On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Also, `Clang Tools ::

-- The C compiler identification is GNU 7.3.1 -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 7.3.1 According to buildbot log here http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/37730/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio for Simon's example ICE. Best, Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. XL/LLVM on Power Compiler Development E-mail: jji at us.ibm.com From: "Finkel, Hal J. via

This just failed again: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/1579 Bill, could you take a look at this? This is like the 3rd time I've been incorrectly pinged by this buildbot due to this issue. -- Sean Silva On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for taking a look. The flaky ASan test failure in the

These self-host builders all just starting failing. It looks like tablegen is being miscompiled. The first failed builds: (1) http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-gcc-i386-linux-selfhost/builds/208 (2) http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/dragonegg-i386-linux/builds/194 (3) http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/dragonegg-x86_64-linux/builds/197 The odd thing is that I can't see any suspicious

Thanks for taking a look. The flaky ASan test failure in the OP was stage1 so it sounds like there may be multiple problems :( -- Sean Silva On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > I threw all the sanitizers I had access to on this test and didn't > find anything. The merging uses threads so I can't rule out > nondeterminism.

Dear Renato, Are you still getting the error? I quick spot check on the server shows that most processes are idle and there's 0.5 GB of RAM left. Nothing is jumping out at me as clearly bad (though I am potentially overlooking something). Regards, John Criswell On 6/28/16 10:39 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone knows what's going on with SVN? > >

I looked at this a bit a while back when you first asked but I didn't see anything obviously wrong. Benjamin, at least one of the referenced failures was on BE powerpc64. I don't remember if that one (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt/builds/4883) failed on stage 1 or 2 and the results pages are no longer available. BTW, I tried testing the same revision many

Hi Bill, Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors? Thanks, Chad On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! > 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 > GMT > What this means for you: > Please keep a watch on all of your

Hi Bill, just a heads up but this bot seems to have spuriously failed on a build that only pulled in my commit r272505 which is unrelated. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt/builds/4883 -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160612/8b2c4493/attachment.html>

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:40 AM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > Yes, I also find the amount of bot spam in #llvm is basically intolerable. > It makes it difficult to see actual people talking. At first, I just put > all the bots on /ignore. Now I have an xchat script to move the botspam to > another tab (tabify-004.pl). I'd recommend that the bots should

This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week! 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 GMT What this means for you: Please keep a watch on all of your patches going into mainline. And pay close attention to the buildbots and fix any issues quickly. Also, please try to finish up any last minute feature work. While it won't be the