Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Announcing: LLVM 3.0 Branch in One Week"
2011 Mar 08
2
[LLVMdev] Announcing LLVM 2.9 Testing!
It's that time again! (Well, it was that time yesterday, but I made a mistake.) The LLVM 2.9 release is now underway!
2.9 Will Be The Last llvm-gcc Release!
That's right! It's the end of an era. The llvm-gcc front-end has served us very well over the years, but with the advent of Clang and DragonEgg it is starting to suffer from bit rot. Starting with the 3.0 release, Clang will be
2011 Feb 28
3
[LLVMdev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week!
07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011 GMT
What this means for you:
Please keep a watch on all of your patches going into mainline. And pay close attention to the buildbots and fix any issues quickly.
Also, please try to finish up any last minute feature work. While it won't be the
2011 Feb 28
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
Hi Bill,
Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors?
Thanks,
Chad
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> This is a reminder that we will be branching for LLVM 2.9 in one week!
> 07:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 PST / 03:00:00 a.m. Monday March 7, 2011
> GMT
> What this means for you:
> Please keep a watch on all of your
2010 Sep 04
0
[LLVMdev] Announcement: LLVM 2.8 Branch Created
The LLVM 2.8 branches have been created! We will be conducting several rounds of testing of this branch during September. See http://llvm.org/ for a tentative schedule.
What this means for you
As I mentioned in a previous e-mail, the branch is still open for code submissions. However there are a few rules that we need to adhere to:
No new features are allowed, no matter how trivial they may be.
2011 Mar 08
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Announcing LLVM 2.9 Testing!
On Mar 8, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 03/08/11 04:01, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> It's that time again! (Well, it was that time yesterday, but I made a mistake.) The LLVM 2.9 release is now underway!
>
>> Developers:
>>
>> Top-of-tree is now open for submissions. The 2.9 release branch and tags are available for you to check out and test.
2012 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] 3.2 Release has branched :T+2 hours
We have branched for the 3.2 release!
Some "sticky reminders":
You can get all of the 3.2 code from the appropriate
.../branches/release_32/
You can track state of the 3.2 release through so called
"Umbrella bug" : http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13893
Hopefully it will not "rain bugs" on us and we will not need
it that much!
After branching all patches
2012 Apr 17
7
[LLVMdev] 3.1 Has Branched
Hi all,
We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!)
If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please contact the code owners (http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#owners) so that they can approve the patches. No patches will be accepted into the 3.1 release without prior approval!
This should be a great release! :-)
-bw
2012 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] 3.1 Has Branched
how to get this branch?
still svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm?
Thank you.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!)
>
> If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please
> contact the code owners
2011 Oct 21
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
Not yet. That is, I don't think any have been filed at all for 3.0. I don't know whether to be happy or worried. :-) Any that are regressions should be marked with the 'regression' keyword and be a release blocker.
-bw
On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Do we have a list of which PRs have been filed that are considered release blockers?
2012 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] 3.2 Release has branched :T+2 hours
I can't find any release_32 branch at http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git or http://llvm.org/git/clang.git.
/Patrik Hägglund
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Pawel Wodnicki
Sent: den 12 november 2012 07:03
To: llvmdev; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: [LLVMdev] 3.2 Release has branched :T+2 hours
We have branched
2012 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 3.1 Has Branched
What was the revision the branch was made from?
On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We branched for the 3.1 release! (Yay!)
>
> If there are any fixes which you think should go into the release, please contact the code owners (http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#owners) so that they can approve the patches. No
2008 Jan 17
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Release branch created!
LLVMers,
The LLVM 2.2 release branches have been created! Over the next 2
days, I will be generating the pre-release tar balls. I will send out
mail once I am done and then the community pre-release testing will
begin. I'll also be sending out detailed instructions and the release
schedule.
As a reminder, please do not commit patches to the release branch.
Please email me with a
2020 Feb 12
2
Whose responsibility is it to maintain tests using experimental backends?
https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#new-targets says that
experimental backends should be supported by an active community, in part
by providing build bots and fixing bugs related to the backend. So while it
doesn't *explicitly* say things about patches that only break those
backends, I think reading the spirit of that policy says that it's the
responsibility of the experimental
2006 Nov 06
1
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Branch Creation TONIGHT 9PM PST
I will be creating the branch at 9PM PST. Please refrain from checking in
any large changes until after the branch creation.
I'm still seeing unexpected dejagnu failures for PPC and X86. Platform
maintainers, please XFAIL these and file bugzilla bugs.
Email me if you have concerns or questions.
-Tanya
2011 Oct 17
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
Hi all,
Testing for LLVM 3.0 release candidate 1 is now under way! We will soon have binaries available for you to download and try. Those who would like to compile things and try them out for themselves can grab the source tarballs here:
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/
A Word About Patches
I neglected to send out instructions on how to get patches into the LLVM 3.0 branch. All patches must
2011 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
Hi Bill,
Do we have a list of which PRs have been filed that are considered release blockers?
-Jim
On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Testing for LLVM 3.0 release candidate 1 is now under way! We will soon have binaries available for you to download and try. Those who would like to compile things and try them out for themselves can grab the source
2011 Feb 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
Chad Colgur <colgur at gmail.com> writes:
> Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors?
I really, really hope this is the case. The official git mirror
documentation says it is only trunk because the current branching scheme
in not suitable for git. I don't understand why that would be but I'm
not a git-svn expert.
My very short reading of the git-svn manpage makes
2012 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] [3.1 Release Announcement] One Week Left!
Hello!
There is one week left before we branch for the 3.1 release! Please make sure your patches are sound and that you take care of any failures quickly. It's very important that the tree be in a healthy state when we branch. If you are in the middle of some major change, please finish it before the branching occurs. If it's not in a completed state, we may have to remove it from the
2011 Feb 28
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: LLVM 2.9 Branching in One Week
On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:01 AM, David A. Greene wrote:
> Chad Colgur <colgur at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Will the 2.9 branch be reflected in the git mirrors?
>
> I really, really hope this is the case. The official git mirror
> documentation says it is only trunk because the current branching scheme
> in not suitable for git. I don't understand why that would be
2007 Sep 13
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 Branch Creation - 9PM PDT!
LLVMers,
I will be creating the branch in 30 minutes (9PM PDT). At that time,
I will send out mail announcing SVN commit access is suspended. Those
with commit privileges should refrain from committing until I send
out mail saying commit access is restored.
Thanks,
Tanya Lattner