similar to: [LLVMdev] How to create arguments CallInst

virtual std::vector<Value *> getESetArgumentosFunc(Function *F){ std::vector<Value *> varg_list; varg_list.clear(); for(Function::arg_iterator arg_iti = F->getArgumentList().begin(), arg_ite = F->getArgumentList().end(); arg_iti != arg_ite; ++arg_iti){ Value *para = ConstantInt::get(IntegerType::get(getGlobalContext(),32), 0); *Value *val2 = cast<*

On 10/6/11 12:40 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi wrote: > virtual std::vector<Value *> getESetArgumentosFunc(Function *F){ > std::vector<Value *> varg_list; > varg_list.clear(); > for(Function::arg_iterator arg_iti = F->getArgumentList().begin(), > arg_ite = F->getArgumentList().end(); arg_iti != arg_ite; ++arg_iti){ > Value *para = >

On 10/6/11 11:48 AM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi wrote: > Hello, > I need create a CallInst to this function > > define i32 @function(i32 %n, i8 %m){ ... } > > I now how get argument's type but I do not know how to create > arguments that meet these types. > For example, if the argument is long, accurate pass CallInst an > integer argument, however, if a Char, Char must

I have two values and I want see if them are equals. Then, I would a instruction like if Value1 != Value2, error without create a new block, continuing the execution in the same block, forcing the LLI to execute this. 2011/9/5 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi > <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote: > >

Ok! I do understand. Thanks by help! 2011/9/5 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi < > parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, that's how I'm doing now ... create a new block where the execution >> flow will continue after the shift, following the basics of basic blocks.

Yes, that's how I'm doing now ... create a new block where the execution flow will continue after the shift, following the basics of basic blocks. But, I want to find a way to reduce the number of block of my code. 2011/9/5 Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> > Rafael Baldiati Parizi wrote: > >> I have two values and I want see if them are equals. Then, I would a >>

Hello, I created a new block for execution to continue, but I got the case in which a statement defined in a block is used in another, not dominate all uses. For example: entry: %n_addr = alloca i32, align 4 %retval = alloca i32 %"alloca point" = bitcast i32 0 to i32 store i32 %n, i32* %n_addr %0 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr inbounds ([20 x i8]*

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi < parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, that's how I'm doing now ... create a new block where the execution > flow will continue after the shift, following the basics of basic blocks. > But, I want to find a way to reduce the number of block of my code. Why do you want to reduce the number of LLVM IR blocks?

Hello, I would know how can I make a branch in llvm ir without a label of destination? For example: br i1 %1, label %bb, *NO LABEL HERE* * * Thanks! -- *Rafael Parizi* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110905/5be7271c/attachment.html>

Rafael Baldiati Parizi wrote: > I have two values and I want see if them are equals. Then, I would a > instruction like > if Value1 != Value2, error > without create a new block, continuing the execution in the same block, > forcing the LLI to execute this. You can not. The definition of a "basic block" is a sequence of instructions with a single entry and a single exit.

Hi, I have the following piece of code: %34 = fptosi float %33 to i32 %35 = call i32 @function(i32 %34) nounwind I would like of know how can I duplicate the statement %35 ? , as follows: %34 = fptosi float %33 to i32 %35 = call i32 @function(i32 %34) nounwind *%36 = **call i32 @function(i32 %34) nounwind* * * i.e, two instructions exactly equal. Using clone, results in badref. Moreover, how

Hi, I'd like to know if is possible to create a new entry block and a branch to old entry block? How can i make this? Thanks -- *Rafael Parizi* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110930/a7c133f9/attachment.html>

Sorry, %3 instead of %4. 2011/9/14 Rafael Baldiati Parizi <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> > Hello, > I created a new block for execution to continue, but I got the case in > which a statement defined in a block is used in another, not dominate all > uses. > For example: > > entry: > %n_addr = alloca i32, align 4 > %retval = alloca i32 > %"alloca

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote: > I have two values and I want see if them are equals. Then, I would a > instruction like > if Value1 != Value2, error > without create a new block, continuing the execution in the same block, > forcing the LLI to execute this. You can't do that; a br instruction must be at the

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I would know how can I make a branch in llvm ir without a label of > destination? > For example: > br i1 %1, label %bb,  NO LABEL HERE What are you trying to do? -Eli

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to know if is possible to create a new entry block and a branch to > old entry block? > How can i make this? Try BasicBlock::splitBasicBlock. -Eli

But the error is related to a conversion between llvm and gcc in "gcc-program.s -o program"? I need to use GDB to make an extraction of the information generated by GDB. For other programs, the process that wrote the first post worked perfectly, except for some. That this is the problem, for the compilation is the need to inform the -lm to link math libraries. It could be related to

Hi, supposing I have a function “foo” like the following: int foo(int a, int b) { ... ... } I want to insert int the LLVM IR a call instructions to a function “bar” that requires the same parameters of foo. So my function foo will become: int foo(int a, int b) { bar(a,b); … ... } I am using the following code: bool ThreadSanitizer::runOnFunction(Function &F) {

A simulator should be expecting the machine opcodes not macros. LD shouldn't care at all as long as the object format plays well. I would think it would be better to fix the simulator. Jack ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu] Sent: Thursday,

Yes, I've tried and it did not work On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>wrote: > Have you tried "opt -stats bitecode.bc > test.txt"?**** > > ** ** > > *From:* llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] *On > Behalf Of *Rafael Parizi > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:36 AM > *To:*