similar to: [LLVMdev] Fortran to llvm IR

Hi, I am very interested in using dragonegg as a fortran frontend for the LLVM test suite, as a start to improve fortran support. I believe this should be easy, but when I looked into this I had the impression the nightly tester in the llvm test-suite does not even support dragonegg for the C/C++ part. Is this true or did I miss something? Are there any patches flying around, that would take

Hi Avstin, > I'm completely new to LLVM (I first heard about it when I happened to come across this "/usr/ports/devel/llvm" directory in FreeBSD and was curious what it was.) Does LLVM support Fortran 2008? Is there a "Flang"? the dragonegg and llvm-gcc front-ends support Fortran. These are both gcc with LLVM replacing gcc's optimizers and code generators.

Hi Tobias, > I am very interested in using dragonegg as a fortran frontend for the LLVM test > suite, as a start to improve fortran support. > > I believe this should be easy, but when I looked into this I had the impression > the nightly tester in the llvm test-suite does not even support dragonegg for > the C/C++ part. Is this true or did I miss something? this is true. >

On 10/17/2011 10:09 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > llvm-gcc is dead, deprecated in favour of clang and dragonegg. It won't be part > of the upcoming 3.0 release. This is why no-one is interested in working on it. The tentative release notes still say otherwise: "LLVM 3.0 will be the last release of llvm-gcc." (http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html) I understand that llvm-gcc

Hi Duncan, On 10/17/2011 04:44 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > PS: A more convincing (IMO) argument against dragonegg is that it doesn't > work on windows. That's because the gcc plugin architecture doesn't work > on windows. Takumi has been thinking about this and has been enable to > get dragonegg to work on windows anyway using some clever tricks. Interesting, thanks for

> > I want to connect each llvm ir > > > > for example: > > 1. Turn C/C++ language into C_llvmIR assembly language using Clang > > 2. Turn Fortran language into Fortran_llvmIR assembly language using Dragonegg > > 3. Turn Python language into Python_llvmIR assembly language using Unladen-Swallow > > 4. Connect each llvm IR > > > > Is this

Devang, I meant as an end user. -Suresh On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > Suresh, > > > On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Suresh Purini wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> What is the default loop-unroll factor in llvm? How can we specify >> our own unroll-factor? > > Here "we" means end user or a

2011/10/18 Albert Graef <Dr.Graef at t-online.de>: > On 10/17/2011 04:44 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> PS: A more convincing (IMO) argument against dragonegg is that it doesn't >> work on windows.  That's because the gcc plugin architecture doesn't work >> on windows.  Takumi has been thinking about this and has been enable to >> get dragonegg to work on

I want to connect each llvm ir for example: 1. Turn C/C++ language into C_llvmIR assembly language using Clang 2. Turn Fortran language into Fortran_llvmIR assembly language using Dragonegg 3. Turn Python language into Python_llvmIR assembly language using Unladen-Swallow 4. Connect each llvm IR Is this possible? Wonjun, Choi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Thank you for quick reply. I see, llvm-gcc is frozen.... Is there Fortran front-end for LLVM then? On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > > BTW, it is little bit strange that llvm-gcc doesn't support CMake > building system. > > LLVM does and it is extremely convenient.... > > llvm-gcc is dead, deprecated

> > .... but some Pure users and many of my students do. Pure relies on > LLVM-capable compilers for its C/C++/Fortran > inlining capabilities, so being able to just point Windows users to a > binary llvm-gcc package to make that work is very convenient. Nice to be called "Pure" :-) especially with capital letter. MinGW binaries for llvm-gcc don't have Fortran

Hi Pavel, > Is there Fortran front-end for LLVM then? yes, dragonegg: http://dragonegg.llvm.org The development version (i.e. the upcoming 3.0 release) works better than llvm-gcc ever did. Ciao, Duncan.

DragonEgg only converts GCC's IR to LLVM IR. And -march=c is C backend. We used it for a while last year, but its support has been dropped several months ago. There are people, who are still using it privately, as far as I know. - D. 2013/3/1 Philipp Schwaha <philipp at schwaha.net> > hi! > > I would like to know if it is feasible to use the dragon egg gcc plugin to >

Hello, I am working on finding good optimization sequences for a given program (phase ordering problem). I have the following setup. 1) The source programs are translated into LLVM IR using -O0 + -scalarrepl. 2) Find an optimization sequence using some strategy which translates the IR generated in the previous step into another IR. 3) Apply llc -O2 and map the IR in to target assembly code.

Dear all, I am doing few experiments to do understand optimization phase interactions. Here is a brief description of my experiements. 1. I picked the list of machine independent optimizations acting on llvm IR (those that are enabled at O3). 2. for each optimzation in the optimization-list a) Compiled the program using 'clang -c O0 -flto program.c' b) opt

Dear all, What is the default loop-unroll factor in llvm? How can we specify our own unroll-factor? -Suresh

Hi 최원준, > I want to connect each llvm ir > > for example: > 1. Turn C/C++ language into C_llvmIR assembly language using Clang > 2. Turn Fortran language into Fortran_llvmIR assembly language using Dragonegg > 3. Turn Python language into Python_llvmIR assembly language using Unladen-Swallow > 4. Connect each llvm IR > > Is this possible? this should work fine: if you

On 11/08/2010 03:18 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Tobias, > >> I am very interested in using dragonegg as a fortran frontend for the >> LLVM test >> suite, as a start to improve fortran support. >> >> I believe this should be easy, but when I looked into this I had the >> impression >> the nightly tester in the llvm test-suite does not even support

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of "C. Bergström" > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:39 AM > To: Rekha R > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] on compiling FORTRAN programs > > On 07/15/14 09:29 PM, Rekha R wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am

PS: A more convincing (IMO) argument against dragonegg is that it doesn't work on windows. That's because the gcc plugin architecture doesn't work on windows. Takumi has been thinking about this and has been enable to get dragonegg to work on windows anyway using some clever tricks.