similar to: [LLVMdev] code generation

I've study their work carefully. My problem is the implementation of threads in llvm after partitionning. I want to have information about how to implement producer/consumer thread in llvm. I do not know where I should start in llvm for code generation and create thread and insert produce and consume statement . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, All I want to implement DSWP Which is used for parallelization of loops. For this purpose, the loop was replaced with a new basic block in main function. And new functions were created and basic blocks of Loop assigned to them.I have checked blocks and branches for Succ and Pred relation and I have not found any problems. However I get the following error: * **opt:

Hi, neda > But for final step and code generation, I don't have any idea and > information to assign partitions and communications to threads. and I stop > in this position. Unfortunately I don’t have enough time and I am under > force to complete the project. What you want to do is pretty much like what DSWP does, see http://liberty.princeton.edu/Research/DSWP/ What

On 12/12/11 10:25 AM, neda 8664 wrote: > > Thank you for your reply > > Yes, I change them, so what should I do for another loops? I don't really know what you should do since I don't know what your code does. All I know is that it's changing the function's control-flow graph. If you're not modifying the structure of the loops in the function, then you can

Thank you for your reply Yes, I change them, so what should I do for another loops? On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:54 PM, neda 8664 <neda8664 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for your reply > > Yes, I change them, so what should I do for another loops? > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > >> On 12/12/11 9:59 AM,

I am changing structure of loops, I used std::vector<> but i get same error, I can’t use FunctionPass :( On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:03 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 12/12/11 10:25 AM, neda 8664 wrote: > > Thank you for your reply > Yes, I change them, so what should I do for another loops? > > > I don't really know what you should

Hi I have checked all blocks, each block have a Terminator instruction and each blocks belongs to a function. I'm really confused. I guess the problem is caused by the removal of the Loop,The code is as follows: * //every block to header (except the ones in the loop), will now redirect to newblock for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(header); PI != pred_end(header); ++PI) {

Hi there, My company is looking for a full-time, in-house rails programmer to start immediately. If you are interested please contact me!!! Thanks! Neda jobs-FUiS5veSkuU@public.gmane.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

0 down vote favorite [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9354312/llvm-2-8-dswp-core-dump-linux#] share [g+] share [fb] share [tw] i new in llvm.i just compile google code and got this error. " Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: opt -load /home/vahid/mywork/llvm-2.8/Release/lib/DSWP.so -dswp obj.o -o out.o 1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager'

hi all, I want access to all basic blocks of function in a loop, so I used the following code: *bool parallel::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) { for (Function::iterator bi= func->begin(); bi != func->end(); bi++){ // } }* First loop run without problem, but for second loop I get the following error: *0 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x0137d530 1 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x0137fa6c 2

Hi all, I am looking appropriate Benchmarking for the assessment of automatic parallelization project. What Benchmarking do you suggest me? regards neda -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111201/95e7779c/attachment.html>

John Criswell <criswell <at> illinois.edu> writes: > > > On 12/12/11 9:59 AM, neda 8664 wrote: > > > hi all, > I want access to all basic blocks of function in a loop, so I used > the following code:bool parallel::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager > &LPM) > { >     for

Hi! I'm writing my own project in LLVM and I came across a document describing Decoupled software pipelining algorithm written in LLVM by The Liberty Research Group for their VELOCITY C++ compiler: http://liberty.princeton.edu/Research/DSWP/ http://liberty.princeton.edu/Publications/micro38_dswp.pdf and some of spectacular results: http://liberty.princeton.edu/videos/gimp.php

Hello, below is the first draft of my proposal for GSoC. Any comments/advices are apreciated. # Implement Decoupled Software Pipeline (DSWP) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The goal of this project is to implement the automatic parallelization technique

On 12/12/11 9:59 AM, neda 8664 wrote: > hi all, > > I want access to all basic blocks of function in a loop, so I used the > following code: > > /bool parallel::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) > { > for (Function::iterator bi= func->begin(); bi != func->end(); bi++){ > // > } > }/ Are you modifying anything within this code

Hi, I have a data.frame which contains timeseries from several different locations, which I want to compare against each other for example calculating RMSE, or normalized mean bias of each location against the others. An example of this is the cor function where I can put in a data.frame and get the correlation of each location compared to the others in the data.frame eg.

Dear Neda, Please explain in more detail what you are trying to do and what is not working. I do not understand what llvm-prof does that you don't like or what you want llvm-prof to do. -- John T. On 9/7/11 1:38 AM, neda 8664 wrote: > hi > I changed llvm-prof and make it, but when use profile.pl > <http://profile.pl> ,i could not see any change in result. > > >

hi I changed llvm-prof and make it, but when use profile.pl ,i could not see any change in result. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110907/fc9be189/attachment.html>

LLVM has no facility for dealing with threads explicitly. If you're implementing a research tool to automatically pipeline software, LLVM could be of use because it is also a JIT with a good API. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, neda 8664 <neda8664 at gmail.com> wrote: > I want automatically parallelize sequential program in thread level to run > on multi-core > processors

I think you might be interested in ExtractCodeRegion() function. - Jakub On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Jakub Staszak <kubastaszak at gmail.com> wrote: > I think you might be interested in ExtractCodeRegion() function. > > - Jakub > > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:40 AM, neda 8664 <neda8664 at gmail.com> wrote: >> i need split a sequential program to multithread. the