similar to: [LLVMdev] Demo page broken

> > The demo page is up, but when I click on "Compile source code" I get: > > Not Found > > The requested URL /demo/test.cgi was not found on this server. > Weird - I noticed this bug a few weeks ago. I assume Tanya must've left some local/test changes in when she was updating the patch with my color diagnostic changes a few weeks ago. The test.cgi was up on

> The demo page is up, but when I click on "Compile source code" I get: >> >> Not Found >> >> The requested URL /demo/test.cgi was not found on this server. >> > > Weird - I noticed this bug a few weeks ago. I assume Tanya must've left > some local/test changes in when she was updating the patch with my color > diagnostic changes a few

The LLVM demo page is currently disabled. I will notify the list if/when it gets re-enabled. Thanks, Tanya

Is that the reason for the down-time? Damn people running their compile jobs on llvm.org... :) On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > The LLVM demo page is currently disabled. I will notify the list if/when > it gets re-enabled. > > Thanks, > Tanya > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:09:10AM +0100, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Blind Faith <person.of.book at gmail.com> writes: > > > I used the LLVM demo page http://llvm.org/demo/ to generate C++ code for > > generating LLVM IR code. But that page is now disabled. Is there any tool > > or other site which does what I'm trying to do, that is I give "C/C++ code"

On Feb 7, 2013, at 6:26 PM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:09:10AM +0100, Óscar Fuentes wrote: >> Blind Faith <person.of.book at gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I used the LLVM demo page http://llvm.org/demo/ to generate C++ code for >>> generating LLVM IR code. But that page is now disabled. Is there

Will this one help? http://ellcc.org/demo/index.cgi Cheers, Nico On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 6:26 PM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:09:10AM +0100, Óscar Fuentes wrote: >>> Blind Faith <person.of.book at gmail.com> writes:

The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. Do you want me to revert the changes? Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the > > llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the > > output page. All other output is normal. So,

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. >> Do you want me to revert the changes? > No. I just said that we should avoid anymore changes for the next 2 weeks to > maintain stability. FWIW, I agree with Tanya on this. People *pound* on the demo page immediately after a release as they try it out and

It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My change was to help people learning LLVM

> The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. > > Do you want me to revert the changes? No. I just said that we should avoid anymore changes for the next 2 weeks to maintain stability. -Tanya > > Reid. > > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >>> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on

Okay, let me reiterate. The llvm2cpp option is *already* on the demo script page. If you choose that option, you just get an error message because llvm2cpp can't be found. Its harmless and everything else still works. I won't change the script for a couple of weeks, per Tanya's and your request. Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:48 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug

> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the > llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the > output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. > If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp > output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My > change was

Hello, I'm trying to get the demo script to run llvm2cpp so that people can get familiar with the LLVM C++ API through the online demo. However, it seems that the path used doesn't include llvm2cpp (not updated in a while?). The demo script currently uses these paths on Zion: /home/vadve/criswell/box/x86/llvm-gcc/bin/ /home/vadve/gaeke/llvm/Release/bin /home/vadve/gaeke/bin

> I'm trying to get the demo script to run llvm2cpp so that people can get > familiar with the LLVM C++ API through the online demo. However, it > seems that the path used doesn't include llvm2cpp (not updated in a > while?). The demo script currently uses these paths on Zion: I can look into this, but I would strongly suggest not messing with the demo script until 2-3

Throwing this C++ code at the online demo: struct S { double d; unsigned u; }; S foo() { return S(); } produces this LLVM C++ API code: (...) PAListPtr func__Z3foov_PAL = 0; { SmallVector<ParamAttrsWithIndex, 4> Attrs; ParamAttrsWithIndex PAWI; PAWI.index = 0; PAWI.attrs = 0 | ParamAttr::NoUnwind; Attrs.push_back(PAWI); PAWI.index = 1; PAWI.attrs = 0 |

No. The demo is using 2.3. I update it personally after every release. Yes, it incorrectly says llvm2cpp, but its really using llc. I'll change this when I update it. The ReleaseNotes in TOT are for 2.4. -Tanya On Oct 17, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Throwing this C++ code at the online demo: > > struct S { > double d; > unsigned u; > }; > > S

Hi, I have gnuwin32 (b18) and the rw0613b.zip version of R. With regards to (re)making the dynload dll demo given (zero.dll) could anyone tell me what the command line for the makefile should be. ie, make -f Makefile.in ...? Thanks for any help -- Douglas -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

I used the LLVM demo page http://llvm.org/demo/ to generate C++ code for generating LLVM IR code. But that page is now disabled. Is there any tool or other site which does what I'm trying to do, that is I give "C/C++ code" as input and I get the "C++ code for generating the equivalent LLVM IR" as output. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi, This isn't that new anymore, but I'd let everyone know that CELT 0.10.0 is out. We've improved the quality quite a bit since the last release and we fixed many bugs. For this release, Monty has written an extensive demo page at: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/celt/demo.html Although it's not final yet, it contains a lot of information of CELT, recent changes and