similar to: [LLVMdev] manipulating @llvm.var.annotation in AST?

Hi Piotr, Thanks. Yeah, it seemed a little weird, but it was what got me closest. I found out that the matcher I supplied here was working for clang-query 3.8.1. I'm working on a clang-tidy module for 4.0.0 - it's not working there. Could you elaborate on the "onImplicitObjectArgument"? There is no document on it on the clang page. So I wouldn't know how it works or what it

Hi Piotr, I think I found a working matcher: match ifStmt(hasCondition(implicitCastExpr(hasImplicitDestinationType(isInteger()), has(cxxMemberCallExpr(callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasName("compare"))), hasArgument(0, declRefExpr().bind("str2")), callee(memberExpr(has(declRefExpr().bind("str1"))))))))).bind("case1") This one bind to both str1 and str2 in

I am trying to locate instructions in an LLVM Pass by line and column number (reported by an third-party tool) to instrument them. To achieve this, I am compiling my source files with `clang -g -O0 -emit-llvm` and looking for the information in the metadata using this code: const DebugLoc &location = instruction->getDebugLoc(); // location.getLine() // location.getCol()

> On Nov 6, 2020, at 17:32, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: > > Cool! I really like the idea. I left a comment about metadata preservation below. > Once this is available we will certainly employ it to understand OpenMP programs better. That sounds like a great use case! Having multiple different uses cases during the bring-up would be very helpful to

> On Nov 9, 2020, at 19:27, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/9/20 5:09 AM, Florian Hahn wrote: >> >>> On Nov 6, 2020, at 17:32, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com <mailto:johannesdoerfert at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Cool! I really like the idea. I left a comment about metadata preservation

Adding cfe-dev, because it is related to clang, not LLVM. 2016-11-27 22:34 GMT+01:00 Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com>: > Hi Mads, > Can you provide the code that you run clang-query on, or at least AST for > the fragment you want to match? > > Piotr > > 2016-11-26 22:27 GMT+01:00 Mads Ravn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > >: >

Hello all, According to *clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp*, a LLVM annotation intrinsic call has 4 arguments: - llvm::Value *AnnotatedVal, - Builder.CreateBitCast(CGM.EmitAnnotationString(AnnotationStr), Int8PtrTy), - Builder.CreateBitCast(CGM.EmitAnnotationUnit(Location), Int8PtrTy), - CGM.EmitAnnotationLineNo(Location) However, this is what an annotation intrinsic *char

Hi, I'm trying to annotate certain functions in C code, and do something with these functions in my LLVM pass. I annotate the C code like this: int __attribute__((annotate("annot"))) function() { This nicely gets added to the LLVM bitcode in an @llvm.global.annotations global. Now I had hoped that it'd be easy to extract a list of functions annotated with my annotation

Hi, i was wondering if there is a way to annotate rgl plot, after searching i haven't found anything suitable. I saw function text3d but was thinking more about text on the margin, so not interactive. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Annotation-rgl-plot-tp22930428p22930428.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi guys, I am trying to extract the class name of a parameter to a method call in objective-C. The code I am parsing is: - (void)testAddConcreteDataModel:(DFDemoDataModelOne*)helpmeh { [self.dataModels addObject:helpmeh]; } And the result I need is the type of class of helpmeh, which is "DFDemoDataModelOne". So far I have the following code, which outputs:

On Jun 25, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi all, Howdy Matthijs, > I've also been developing an interest in using IR annotations for my > compiler. > Some discussion with Bart turns out that he has implemented some > code to parse > the llvm.globals.annotations array, but in no way integrated or > reusable. > We've spent some thought about how

Hi, I would like to propose a new !annotation metadata kind that can be attached to arbitrary instructions to drive generating remarks that provide additional insight into transformations applied to a program. To motivate this, consider these specific questions we would like to get answered: * How many stores added for automatic variable initialization remain after optimizations? Where are

Hello, I am working on an LLVM pass which, among other things, selectively duplicates instructions in a program. This results in a few new instructions added to the final IR to facilitate checking, and I'd like to annotate the generated code file with a comment or something like it that would indicate that a given specific instruction has some certain property. Essentially, just printing

Hello, I would like to annotate a graph with the expression 'alpha = 5%' (the alpha should be displayed as the greek letter). I tried > text(1,1,expression(alpha == 5%)) which gives a syntax error. escaping the percent sign (\%) or doubling (%%) does not help. What do I do? Thanks, Martin Keller-Ressel -- Martin Keller-Ressel Research Unit of Financial and Actuarial

Hi Florian, On 11/9/20 5:09 AM, Florian Hahn wrote: > >> On Nov 6, 2020, at 17:32, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Cool! I really like the idea. I left a comment about metadata preservation below. >> Once this is available we will certainly employ it to understand OpenMP programs better. > That sounds like a great use case!

Hi all, I need to use annotate inside the C++ code and want to know why doesn't it work? How can I modify my sources to use annotate inside the C++ code too? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Hripsime. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120222/21e75ec8/attachment.html>

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array > indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array > indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array > indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for