similar to: [LLVMdev] ARM: unresolvable R_ARM_PLT32 relocation

Hi Karel, It actually looks like the argument parser has parsed "thumb -mattr=v7,thumb2,vfp3" as the full argument to "-march=". Strange. The easiest way to get what you want is probably "-mtriple thumbv7--". v7 has Thumb2 enabled and VFPv3 (along with NEON) by default. Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu

Hello, I'm trying to convince llc to compile into thumb2 ISA on ARMv7. I'm using: -march=thumb -mattr=v7,thumb2,vfp3 but llc complains about this with: llc: error: invalid target 'thumb -mattr=v7,thumb2,vfp3' I'm using LLVM from Aug 29 2011. To me the set of options looks sane so I'd like to ask what's wrong with this. Thanks! Karel

Hi Jim and Eric! thanks a lot for your fantastically fast reply. I'm going to update and will report tomorrow when all the building is done. Thanks! Karel On 08/29/11 11:36 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Hi Karel, > > Mind trying again with current top of tree? Owen's fixed a few things today that were manifesting with that error. > > -Jim > > On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:33

Hello, I've compiled today's LLVM on ARM/Linux machine and attempted to use our GHC/ARM port (which is using LLVM as a backend for generating machine code) with it but I've failed in compiling GHC alone as LLVM fails on me with following message: llc: /export/home/karel/vcs/llvm-ghc-arm/lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp:612: void llvm::MachineInstr::addOperand(const

On May 27, 2011, at 10:49 AM, David Dunkle wrote: > Thanks, that helps a lot. > >> All chips (to date) with NEON have VFP3, so it's safe to assume that a > -mfpu=neon will have VFP3, so all the decisions >> about code generated for VFP3 can safely be assumed by targets with > NEON. > > Just to confirm my understanding, can I correctly say in general that >

Hi Karel, Mind trying again with current top of tree? Owen's fixed a few things today that were manifesting with that error. -Jim On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Karel Gardas wrote: > Hello, > > I've compiled today's LLVM on ARM/Linux machine and attempted to use our GHC/ARM port (which is using LLVM as a backend for generating machine code) with it but I've failed in

Thanks, that helps a lot. > All chips (to date) with NEON have VFP3, so it's safe to assume that a -mfpu=neon will have VFP3, so all the decisions > about code generated for VFP3 can safely be assumed by targets with NEON. Just to confirm my understanding, can I correctly say in general that the llc code generator might blur distinctions between NEON and VFP3 when it can do so

On 27 May 2011 19:47, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Not exactly. The distinction is clear, it's just not expressed as an > either/or question. Specifically, the code generator considers NEON to be a > proper superset of VFP3. So if it has only VFP3, that's all it will use. If > it has NEON, it assumes it also has VFP3 and can use either. Indeed. >

On 27 May 2011 02:04, David Dunkle <ddunkle at arxan.com> wrote: > In all cases, I get code that looks pretty very the same; its like what > is below. However, I am expecting to see instruction level differences > between the vfp3 and neon versions. When I do the same with gcc 4.2 I do > see differences in the generated code. Hi David, You could see different instructions (as

I have a code generation question for ARM with VFP and NEON. I am generating code for the following function as a test: void FloatingPointTest(float f1, float f2, float f3) { float f4 = f1 * f2; if (f4 > f3) printf("%f\n",f2); else printf("%f\n",f3); } I have tried compiling with: 1. -mfloat-abi=softfp and -mfpu=neon 2.

How can I ensure use of VFP3 via LLVM target options? I am currently using thumbv7-windows-msvc as the target triple and default set of llvm::TargetOptions. Thanks, Daman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140623/bdf36cce/attachment.html>

Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.7 Severity: normal After installing logcheck on a system it posted an error to the cron mail address hourly. An untrapped script error was posting stderr output to cron. It originated here: # Hostname either fully qualified or not. if [ $FQDN -eq 1 ]; then HOSTNAME="$(hostname --fqdn)" > /dev/null 2>&1 else

I am not using llvm tools, but sources and directly calling into relevant LLVM classes and methods. Thanks, Daman On 23/06/14 4:11 pm, "Amara Emerson" <amara.emerson at gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Damanjit, > >I assume you're trying to use the tools like llvm-mc, in which case >you can use the -mattr=+vfpv3 flag to enable it. This applies to other >subtarget

Thanks andrew for the answer. I would like to generate code for Cortex-A9 that don't use neon for fp computation but vfpv3 -d16. I've tried some combination of -mattr=+neon,-neonfp,+vfp3,+d16 but couldn't get ".fpu vfpv3-d16" directive generated in assembly file. Do you know how to make it happen ? Best Regards Seb From: Andrew Trick [mailto:atrick at apple.com] Sent:

Hi, On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Frank Thommen wrote: > This problem still bites us. I've tried to play around with DHCP > settings (rd.net.timeout.dhcp, rd.net.dhcp.retry) to no avail. > > I'm happy about /any/ hint. 1) ip route seems ok, but what does your /etc/resolv.conf looks like? 2) could you try with 7.3.1611, 7.2.1511 is no longer supported. Tru >

Hi On 15/05/17 19:30, Tru Huynh wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Frank Thommen wrote: >> This problem still bites us. I've tried to play around with DHCP >> settings (rd.net.timeout.dhcp, rd.net.dhcp.retry) to no avail. >> >> I'm happy about /any/ hint. > 1) ip route seems ok, but what does your /etc/resolv.conf looks like?

On Mon, 15 May 2017 at 20:05 zulu, Frank Thommen wrote: > lustre driver https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release/el7.3.1611/

This problem still bites us. I've tried to play around with DHCP settings (rd.net.timeout.dhcp, rd.net.dhcp.retry) to no avail. I'm happy about /any/ hint. Cheers frank On 04/24/2017 11:57 PM, Frank Thommen wrote: > Hi, > > kickstarting fails due to problems with host resolution, even though the > network seems to be properly configured through DHCP. eno1 and eno2 are

I found a fix! The first hunk of https://reviews.llvm.org/D17533 (lib/CodeGen/TargetFrameLoweringImpl.cpp) on top of 3.8.1 does the trick. Does llvm do patch releases of old versions? Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> writes: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Shea Levy via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm hitting

Hello Team, Good Morning!! This is Vishnu Prasanth doing my master's thesis on improving llvm compiler optimization. Currently I am trying to build dragon egg and when I gave take, it is not getting recognized for ARM machine. Can you please help me with. Below are the errors when I gave the below command inside dragon egg directory GCC=GCC_DIR/gcc