similar to: [LLVMdev] bitwise AND

Hello, I'm trying to compile vmkit on a x86_64 linux box with gcc-4.1.2, but I'm running into troubles because of various problems with casts between pointers and integers. Is there anybody who succeeded in this task? Az I see, some of the problems can be fixed with an appropriate typedef/macro declaration, but in VMCore/JavaObject.cpp some lowlevel bitmanipulation is used, to mark

Hi Zsombor, Thanks for the patch! Unfortunately I can't apply it because the llvm API has moved from BinaryOperator::create to BinaryOperator::Create. Are you using svn head? Now on the x86_64 part. There has been very little work on porting vmkit on x86_64. If you're having compilation problems, I suppose it's in the garbage collector directory (GCMmap2). If you could make the

Hi All, Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Let me know if you have any additions, improvements, or see any oversights. If you have commit access, please just directly change the document. The release is planned to go out in about 24 hours from now! Thanks! -Chris

Hi, I have three constants (B, C and V) and V = B + C. I want to find out if B + C wraps around. The way I'll do it is, assuming B and C are both positive, to check if V < B or C. For this I need the values of B, C and V. I tried using APInt as below. *** If (isa<Constant> (B) && isa<Constant> (C) && isa<Constant>(V)) { ConstantInt *CV =

Hi guys! I have to compute something and i don't know what i'm doing wrong. my code is a bit complex, but imagine that is something like this: a = c(1,2,3,4) ia = length(a) x = seq(1,100,length=0.1) ib = length(x) int1 = numeric(ib) b = numeric(ib) for(j in 1:ia) { H = function(x) {sin(x + a[j])} for(i in 1:ib) { int = integrate(H, lower = 0, upper

> Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html The description of nocapture is a bit funny: "... pointer arguments to functions that access through but do not return the pointer in a data structure that out lives the call" I think it needs s/return/retain/ and s/out lives/outlives/ > In addition, many APIs have changed in this release. Some

Hello! I''ve put some questions on this list some weeks ago and I''ve got good answers. Thank you! Now I''ve finished my (beautyful) script and I ran it on my router... About my script: It routes packages based on their destination on the Internet. I have about 1650 preffered destination networks listed in some file. The script read this file and marks every package for

On Feb 11, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Alex wrote: > In my hardware there are two special registers cannot be copied but > can only be assigned and referenced (read) in the other instruction. > They are allocatable also. > > br i1 %if_cond, label %then, label %else > then: > %x1 = fptosi float %y1 to i32 > br label %endif > else: > %x2 = fptosi float %y2 to i32 >

Hi! I built some rules to shape traffic from my linux router in both dirrections: to the Internet and to the LAN. When i apply the rules my computer cannot acces the Internet or the LAN. Is this behavior normal? Do I need to write some rules for local IPs of my router? (I have sevaral, both on the internal and the external NICs.) Thank you for any advice! Sorin.

In my hardware there are two special registers cannot be copied but can only be assigned and referenced (read) in the other instruction. They are allocatable also. br i1 %if_cond, label %then, label %else then: %x1 = fptosi float %y1 to i32 br label %endif else: %x2 = fptosi float %y2 to i32 br label %endif endif: %x3 = phi i32 [%x1, %then], [%x2, %else] PNE::LowerAtomiPHINode() fails

Hi guys! I have to compute something and i don't know what i'm doing wrong. my code is a bit complex, but imagine that is something like this: a = c(1 2 3 4) ia = length(a) x = seq(1,100,length=0.1) ib = length(x) for(j in 1:ia) { H = function(x) {sen(x) + a[j]} for(i in 1:ib) { int = function(x) { integrate(H, lower = 0, upper = x[i])} int1[i] = int(1) } end

? Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:44:08 +0000 "Levine, Michael" <mlevins at purdue.edu> ?????: > Let us say we have a function > > F <- function(x){ body of the function} > > Where x is, in general, a d by 1 vector with d>1. Now I want to > integrate out some of the coordinates of x, e.g. x[1] or x[2] or both > of them etc. I'm well aware of how to integrate

On Jan 20, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Jay Foad wrote: >>> I realise that the DataTypes.h.in part might be controversial. Also, >>> there's probably a better place to put it, but I'm not sure where. >> >> I didn't apply this part. What problems does it cause to not have >> this? Can we fix uses of max and min? > > I could try to fix this by changing

Please start a new thread for a new topic and use a meaningful subject for sake of the archives and everyone trying to follow. Using your Int1, correcting your Int2 and using your Y (which goes to Jul not Aug as per the comment): library(zoo) > as.ts(with(merge.zoo(Int1, Int2, Y, fill = 0), pmax(Int1, Int2))) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1992

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Pranav Bhandarkar <pranavb at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have three constants (B, C and V) and V = B + C. I want to find out if B + > C wraps around. The way I'll do it is, assuming B and C are both positive, > to check if V < B or C. > For this I need the values of B, C and V. I tried using APInt as below. > *** > If

Hello, I would like to know if there is an instruction to convert values from the Int1 type to the Double type in LLVM. I would like to achieve the equivalent of casting a bool value to a double value in C++. Doing the simple CreateSIToFP or CreateUIToFP does not work, it throws an assertion ("invalid cast"). I simply want to avoid branching it's not necessary. What's the

I have a function that manipulates a list of numeric and character components of equal length and wants to return a data.frame. EG, f<-function() { a<-list(Int1=1:5,Char1=letters[1:5],Char2=letters[6:10]) b<-data.frame(a) } How can I get the columns Char1, Char2, (...CharN) returned coerced to character and not factor? It appears that I could coerce individual columns by

Hi all, We noticed a lot of unnecessary ptrtoint instructions that stand in way of some of our optimizations; the code pattern looks like this: bb1: %int1 = ptrtoint %struct.s* %ptr1 to i64 bb2: %int2 = ptrtoint %struct.s* %ptr2 to i64 %bb3: %phi.node = phi i64 [ %int1, %bb1 ], [%int2, %bb2 ] %ptr = inttoptr i64 %phi.node to %struct.s* In short, the pattern above arises due to: 1.

http://lisas.de/~patrick/temp/rtp-optimierung.png Everything is working fine in my Setup, but I want Extern1 to talk to Extern2 directly whitout going over Asterisk as the uplink is slow. When I set for Extern1/2 canreinvite=yes it works, but "Intern-2-Extern" doesn't work because Asteisk gives out the private IP-Adresses of Int1/2 I defined localnet=10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 (Private

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Nyx<mcheva at cs.mcgill.ca> wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to know if there is an instruction to convert values from the > Int1 type to the Double type in LLVM. I would like to achieve the equivalent > of casting a bool value to a double value in C++. Doing the simple > CreateSIToFP or CreateUIToFP does not work, it throws an assertion