similar to: [LLVMdev] lli interpreter fails to execute external functions

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] lli interpreter fails to execute external functions"

2009 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Xu Yang wrote: > Hi: > > When I try to execute lli -force-interpreter=true hello.bc, it gave the > following error: > > LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: i32 (i8*)* puts > > I think the error is because C library is not being linked with the byte > code, but I was not able to find any helpful instruction in lli's document. > > Can you
2009 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Nick Lewycky<nicholas at mxc.ca> writes: >> The interpreter uses libffi to make external function calls. However, it >> needs to be detected at LLVM's compile time. If you're using the >> released packages, we disabled that because we were worried about users >> who don't have libffi installed. > > This seems to be
2009 Nov 16
3
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> writes: > The interpreter uses libffi to make external function calls. However, it > needs to be detected at LLVM's compile time. If you're using the > released packages, we disabled that because we were worried about users > who don't have libffi installed. This seems to be quite a common problem (I too hit it once, thought it
2009 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Hi Nick: The first problem have been solved by calling llvm-ld: $ llvm-ld -o hellosin.llvm hellosin.bc -lm $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/usr/lib/libm.so hellosin.llvm.bc hello sin: 0.50 The pthread problem remains after llvm-ld: $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/lib/libpthread.so.0 phello.llvm.bc 0 lli 0x08796bf8 Segmentation fault For those who are getting "invalid
2010 Feb 26
1
[LLVMdev] lli --force-interpreter does not find external function
Hello everyone, I'm trying to run a LLVM-Bytecode-file in the interpreter (lli --force-interpreter), but i'm getting the following error-message: LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: i8* (i32)* malloc My program is calling malloc. If I omit --force-interpreter everything runs as expected. Compiling to Assembler also works without problems. I have compiled LLVM with
2009 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Hi Nick: Thanks for pointing me to libffi. Recompile LLVM with libffi does solve the problem of printf. But it still has other problems: 1) sinf() returns 0 in the interpreter, but returns correct value in JIT (see hellosin.c) 2) calling pthread_create cause lli to crash in the interpreter mode, but no problem in JIT (see phello.c). My questions are: i) can I call any arbitrary external function
2009 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Hi Nick: Thanks for the response. You are right about sinf. I changed the constant to sscanf(argv[1], ...), and it gave me back 0 again. I also compared the disassembled code, and saw it was indeed the case. The primary reason I use interpreter is because I wish to do runtime checking on memory access pattern in multithreaded C programs. for example, if thread one is in the critical section, I
2009 Nov 18
3
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Xu Yang wrote: > Hi Nick: > > The first problem have been solved by calling llvm-ld: > > $ llvm-ld -o hellosin.llvm hellosin.bc -lm > $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/usr/lib/libm.so hellosin.llvm.bc > hello sin: 0.50 Only because the optimizer saw sin(constant) and folded it away. The entire program became 'print constant string'. There is certainly a bug
2010 Jan 01
1
[LLVMdev] How does JIT/lli work with bc file?
Hi Eli, I think the llvm configure has already configured with ffi. ../llvm-2.6/configure -help | grep ffi --enable-libffi Check for the presence of libffi (default is YES) In addition, the printf() can work in program, reflecting that libffi is working, right? How can I make Interpreter work with getpid(), fork(), and clone()? On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Eli
2013 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Interpreter & QSort
Hi, I am trying to run an LLVM analysis on a C++ program that calls qsort(), using the LLVM interpreter (lli --force-interpreter). The code is the qsort_large.c file in the MiBench benchmark suite. If I comment the qsort() call, the execution works fine. If I uncomment the qsort() call, I run into a segmentation fault error as follows: 0  lli             0x0000000000d35c6f 1  lli        
2013 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Interpreter & Qsort
Hi, I am trying to run an LLVM analysis on a C++ program that calls qsort(), using the LLVM interpreter (lli --force-interpreter). The code is the qsort_large.c file in the MiBench benchmark suite. If I comment the qsort() call, the execution works fine. If I uncomment the qsort() call, I run into a segmentation fault error as follows: 0 lli 0x0000000000d35c6f 1 lli
2009 Nov 16
2
[LLVMdev] lli -force-interpreter complains about external function
Hi: When I try to execute lli -force-interpreter=true hello.bc, it gave the following error: LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: i32 (i8*)* puts I think the error is because C library is not being linked with the byte code, but I was not able to find any helpful instruction in lli's document. Can you please teach me how to do it? Thanks Xu The hello.bc is
2011 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM interpreter does not support fmod
Hi, > It seems llvm interpreter only supports a limited number of external > functions. fmod, in particular is not supported. any reason why it is not > supported ? > > "lli -force-interpreter test.bc > LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: double (double, > double)* fmod > " You can check out the comments in
2009 Dec 31
0
[LLVMdev] How does JIT/lli work with bc file?
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Heming Cui <heming at cs.columbia.edu> wrote: > Hi Eli, >     Thanks for your reply. If I add -force-interpreter to lli, then it seems > that it can not run external function like printf or malloc. Is there any > easy way to solve this problem? Does the LLVM configure find libffi? -Eli
2011 Jun 15
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM interpreter does not support fmod
On Jun 14, 2011, at 7:57 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > Hi, > >> It seems llvm interpreter only supports a limited number of external >> functions. fmod, in particular is not supported. any reason why it is not >> supported ? >> >> "lli -force-interpreter test.bc >> LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: double (double, >> double)* fmod
2010 Feb 01
0
[LLVMdev] llvm interpreter cannot execute llvm-gcc generated bitcode
On 02/01/2010 01:13 PM, Kristaps Straupe wrote: > Hello again! > > We have fetched the latest llvm sources from repository and the > original problem has went away. Though now we are facing a new problem > with interpreter on the following c code: > > -------------- > #include <stdarg.h> > #include <stdio.h> > > void doTheThing(int dummy, ...) > {
2009 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] Compilation problem with JIT/Interpreter
Hello > Is there additionnals information to provide to the linker when > compiling llvm on mac os x? Do you have libffi installed somehere? > > > The second question concerns Yellow Dog Distribution(6.2) on CellSPU > processor. Does lli support JIT compilation on CELL? No. As far as I can see, there is no JIT for SPU. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of
2012 Dec 25
2
[LLVMdev] [DragonEgg] Strange call to @"\01__isoc99_fscanf"
Dear all, First of all, Merry Christmas! :) While testing a File I/O sample program, I've encountered a link failure due to missing implementation of "\01__isoc99_fscanf" function. I think this function should be named "__isoc99_fscanf" instead. Please see the program code and LLVM IR generated by DragonEgg and clang below. It shows that clang generates
2009 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] Compilation problem with JIT/Interpreter
Jerome: No, there are no plans to JIT to SPU. That's considerably more complicated -- you'd have to figure out when to JIT to the SPU and live with all of the constraints that the SPU imposes (data reformatting, r/w DMA, ensure your code lives in 256K unless you can manage to interface with the virtual I-cache work.) Basically, it's not trivial and it doesn't quite fit into the
2009 Dec 18
0
[LLVMdev] Compilation problem with JIT/Interpreter
Thank very much for this answer, so my last question will be: is it possible to use the LLVM JIT on a PS3 with Yellow Dog 6.2 distribution, instead of the LLVM interpreter, by using the PPE as it seems to be similar to 64-bit PowerPC processors? 2009/12/18 Scott Michel <scooter.phd at gmail.com> > Jerome: > > No, there are no plans to JIT to SPU. That's considerably more