similar to: [LLVMdev] Using sret AND thiscall calling convention

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Damien Gleizes <gleizesd at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to generate LLVM IR that calls an external C++ function > returning a structure by copy: > vec3 vec3::Cross(const vec3& iV) const; > > Here is the LLVM IR that I am generating for win32 ABI, which says that the > first parameter should be a pointer to the

> Attached is a patch that fixes all the test failures I saw due to > printing out the thiscall attribute on types. > > Do we want to land this now, or wait until the thiscall switch is > actually flipped for MinGW? Maybe combining the patches would be the best? It is funny, I had never tried check-all on mingw. I just did and found some codegen errors, mostly when we look for

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >> I think we need to relax the test cases. MSVC usually prints the calling >> convention, and it's often useful information. > > I was going to argue that MSVC doesn't print them, but then I tried, >

Simple one, have read and googled, still no luck! I want to create several empty vectors all of the same length. I would like multiple empty vectors (vec1, vec2, vec3) and want to create them all in one line. I've tried vec1,vec2,vec3 <- vector(length=5) and c(vec1,vec2,vec3) <- vector(length=5) and several other attempts but nothing seems to work ... suggestions? Thanks Jim

Hi all, I’ve narrowed down a problem in my code to the following test case: - - - - typedef struct {float v[2];} vec2; typedef struct {float v[3];} vec3; vec2 getVec2(); vec3 getVec3() { vec2 myVec = getVec2(); vec3 res; res.v[0] = myVec.v[0]; res.v[1] = myVec.v[1]; res.v[2] = 1; return res; } - - - - Compiling this with any level of optimization for arm64 gives incorrect code,

Thanks Bruce. > On 4 May 2015, at 13:18, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote: > > I can confirm that, with Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn) > > Very strange! Yes, that’s what I thought. I’ve also checked the binary downloads for OS X from llvm.org <http://llvm.org/> and get the same broken code from both the 3.5.2 and 3.6.0 releases.

Hello, My input language has support for 3 and 4 element vectors but my target only has support for the latter. The language defines vec3 with the same storage space as vec4 so from a backend perspective they are both the same. I'd really like if I could have LLVM treat vec3 as vec4 but I haven't found out how. Currently the target has emulated support for vec3 through LLVM. Loads are

Try factor(vec2) in your bwplot() call. -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch]On Behalf Of Ernesto Jardim Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:41 AM To: Mailing List R Subject: [R] Problem with bwplot Hi, I'm ploting some box-and-whisker plots with bwplot but I'm not getting any box-and-whiskers ... just dots.

Hi, * Is there a way to setup LLVM to automatically convert vec3s to vec4s? Yes, if you specify v3i16 and friends as "promote" instead of "legal", llvm will promote it to a v4i16. The ARM NEON backend does this already. I'm surprised you haven't got this happening already as you mention that LLVM widens your loads to 4-element vectors. (this should happen during

James, Thanks for your response. I'm working in LLVM 2.7 (I know, it's old) and the default behavior is already promote. This means that for example a call to DAGTypeLegalizer::getTypeAction(v3i32) in my case and I presume in ARM NEON returns TypeWidenVector. From here legalization calls WidenVectorOperand() to process the STORE node and follows the call chain I have on my original email

Hi, there I'm currently trying to figure out how to keep my "factor" levels for a variable when moving it from one data frame or matrix to another. Example below: vec1<-(rep("10",5)) vec2<-(rep("30",5)) vec3<-(rep("80",5)) vecs<-c(vec1, vec2, vec3) resp<-rnorm(2,15) dat<-as.data.frame(cbind(resp, vecs))

I still haven't received any feedback on me adding support for widening of stores. Is there interest? Thanks, Javier From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Martinez, Javier E Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 11:35 AM To: James Molloy; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Expand vector type James, Thanks for your response.

Hello, I'm writing a piece of code where I need to compare multiple same length vectors. I've gone through the basic functions like identical() or all(), but they only work for comparing 2 vectors. From 3 vectors on, it doesn't work . Example: Assuming vec1 <- c (1,2,3,4,5) vec2 <- c(1,2,3,4,5) vec3 <- c(1,2,3,4,4) identical (vec1,vec2,vec3) returns TRUE, since the 2

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:22 PM Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote: > > We're in-progress designing a RISC-V extension (http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/2019-January/000433.html) that would have variable-length vectors of short vectors (1 to 4): > <VL x <4 x

Help-Rs,   I've got three vectors representing participants:   vec1 <- c(4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81) vec2 <- c (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66) vec3 <- c (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,52)   I'd

Hi Javier, On 05/03/12 18:10, Martinez, Javier E wrote: > I still haven’t received any feedback on me adding support for widening of > stores. Is there interest? did you try LLVM 3.0? Ciao, Duncan. > > Thanks, > > Javier > > *From:*llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] *On > Behalf Of *Martinez, Javier E > *Sent:* Wednesday,

Dear all, Without a loop, I would like transform 3 numeric vectors empty of 0/1 of same length Vec1 : transform 1 to A and 0 to "" Vec2 : transform 1 to B and 0 to "" Vec3 : transform 1 to C and 0 to "" to obtain only 1 vector Vec who is the paste of the 3 vectors (Ex : ABC, BC, AC, AB,...) Any idea ? Thank you for your help -- Michel ARNAUD

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 1:19 AM Bruce Hoult <brucehoult at sifive.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:53 PM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton via > llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > --- > > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:22 PM Jacob Lifshay

I want to create a number of vectors like : vec1 <- rnorm(1) vec2 <- rnorm(2) vec3 <- rnorm(3) and so on........... Here I tried following : for (i in 1:10) paste("vec", i, sep="") <- rnorm(i) However obviously that is not working. Here vectors I need to be seperated i.e I do not want to create a "list". How to modify above code? -- View this

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Dan Sanduleac<sanduleac.dan at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, I see. Didn't think of this, thanks! > > So, just to be clear, there's no binding overhead in Cython because the > functions defined there are pure python, right? (The function objects I > mean). Whereas the ones I defined in Boost are more expensive to call. > > On Wed, Aug