similar to: [LLVMdev] PARSEC benchmarks for LLVM test-suite

There was some talk a year ago about a patch that merges PARSEC into the test suite. Here is a link to the thread: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-August/033877.html Has this just fallen through the cracks? Any help on this subject is welcome. Thanks! -- Wonsun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > >> Patrick, >> >> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> >>> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >>> files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, >>> canneal,

Patrick, On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: > It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT > files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, > canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I > will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test > thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before

It's not *that* big. The patch is 634K uncompressed. I'd say it would be annoying to have that attached to an email message, but it's no bigger than existing MultiSource tests. --Patrick On 07/21/2010 08:13 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell<criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:57 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Patrick, >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> It is open-source and

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > Patrick, > > On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Patrick Simmons wrote: >> It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT >> files to all the pieces I want to merge.  These are blackscholes, >> canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions.  I >>

From here: http://parsec.cs.princeton.edu It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them. May I please commit my

I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite infrastructure? The patch is available at [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? Best regards, --Patrick

Has anyone ever used pool allocation on PARSEC? If not, has anyone ever compiled PARSEC to whole-program LLVM bytecode executables? If you have done either of these things, would you please email me your .bldconf files? Thanks, --Patrick

Would someone please merge this for me? --Patrick On 08/05/10 13:43, Patrick Alexander Simmons wrote: > I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite > infrastructure? The patch is available at > [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no > objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? > > Best regards, > --Patrick

Hello Duncan Is it possible that we can use LLVM optimization beside O1, O2, O3 along with dragonegg plugin? Regards Shahzad On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Abdul Wahid Memon <engrwahidmemon at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks alot Chad for these quick and fine responses. > > Regards > > Abdul > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com>

Hello Duncan I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is producing an error $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce $ clang *.s Regards Shahzad On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Shahzad, > >

Hello Duncan On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Shahzad, > > >> I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to >> produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is >> producing an error >> >> $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c >>

Hi Shahzad, > Is it possible that we can use LLVM optimization beside O1, O2, O3 > along with dragonegg plugin? sure, try this: gcc -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so ...other_options_here... -S -o - -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-ir-optimize=0 | opt -pass1 -pass2 ... Here -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir tells it to output LLVM IR rather than target assembler.

Devang, I see the cause for confusion. Your message from this morning was specifically referring to this assert: Assertion `ExtVNI == VNI && "Unexpected existing value number"' failed. That assertion was fixed in the r144547. The PR shows this assert: Assertion failed: (isMetadata() && "Wrong MachineOperand accessor"), function Bisect fails until the

Message: 6 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:46:19 -0400 From: Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com<mailto:chad.rosier at gmail.com>> To: llvmdev <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>> Subject: [LLVMdev] Potential SimplifyCFG optimization; hammock to diamond transformation Message-ID: <CAMo3wbR6x1wBzb17=GrkERV7kvzx2RdpuheFzyxkQEs3BBvKaw at

Hi Shahzad, > I tried your method and it works fine. What would be the next step to > produce the final executable? I have tried the following but it is > producing an error > > $ gcc -fplugin=/path/to/dragonegg.so -S *.c > -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir | opt -adce this won't work because you aren't passing the IR to opt (you need -o - for that if using a pipe) and you

Hello Duncan Sorry for the mistake. Actually that error occurred when I was compiling all the files at once, NOT in for loop. The for loop is working perfectly as it is dealing with individual files. I have now one new issue. Let me specify it briefly. If I compile the program using the following command line i.e. $ clang -O3 -lm *.c then $ time ./a.out real 0m2.606s user 0m2.584s sys

Sure. The comb.ll and data files are attached and can be invoked as the following $ lli comb.ll data -c Regards Shahzad On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > >> Yes, they both are exactly the same. > > > then I don't know what is going on.  I suggest you send a copy of comb.ll to > the > list so that we can

Thanks Duncan It was really helpful. Regards Abdul On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > >> If I compile the program using the following command line i.e. >> >> $ clang -O3 -lm *.c > > > this may be doing link time optimization. > > >> >> then >> >> $ time ./a.out >>