similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm bugzilla broken?

We have had some issues with commenting on bugs in bugzilla. I've attempted to determine the root problem but have been unsuccessful. We are due for an upgrade, so I'll be doing that this month and hopefully that will help this issue. Sorry for the inconvenience and I agree its annoying. -Tanya On Jul 31, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Is the llvm bugzilla having issues?

Hi All I am having 2 very long character strings (550chars) and I want to put them as expressions together with c(). The problem is that I also get these double-quotes, as seen below in 'fct'. How can I remove these double-quotes? I tried as.name() but it did not work (because of size?). These are creating trouble with subsequent programs, which I tested with strings that for some

Hi I am using the following script to average a set of data 0f 62 columns into 31 colums. The data consists of values of ln(0.01) or -4.60517 instead of NA's. These need to be averaged for each row (i.e 2 values being averaged). What I would I need to change for me to meet the conditions: 1. If each run of the sample has a value, the average is given 2. If only one run of the sample has a

hello, i can't figure out how to set position of panels of my stripplot - i`d like the panels of one level of the factor stage (nr. of panels within each stage, A: 12, B: 12, C: 12, D: 4, each panel representing a site) to be in one column, with A to D from left to right and with descending site.nr at each row. like: A1 B1 C1 D1 A2 B2 .. .. A3 .. .. .. how is this achieved? any help

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:36:18AM -0800, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Currently the replacement of allocation routines is based on creating > a new malloc zone and a new CFAllocator (because the allocator > replacement is done later than it could be, we must have both). This > makes us depend on CoreFoundation to call CFAllocatorSetDefault. > Because of some bugs in CF which start

hello, i need to calculate ci's for each of 4 groups within a dataset, to be able to infere about differences in the variable "similarity". the problem is that data within groups is dependent, as assigned by the blocking-factor "site". my guess was to use a block bootstrap but samples within in these blocks / sites are not of same length. i was not able to find a method to

hello, i'd appreciate help with my glmer. i have a dependent which is an index (MH.index) ranging from 0-1. this index can also be considered as a propability. as i have a fixed factor (stage) and a nested random factor (site) i tried to model with glmer. i read that it's possible to use a quasibinomial distribution, for this kind of data, which i than actually did - but firstly (1)

Currently the replacement of allocation routines is based on creating a new malloc zone and a new CFAllocator (because the allocator replacement is done later than it could be, we must have both). This makes us depend on CoreFoundation to call CFAllocatorSetDefault. Because of some bugs in CF which start firing after CFAllocatorSetDefault, we have to add several hacks to circumvent the effects of

I am trying to run the FIRST Robotics compiler on my linux box using wine. I am using the gentoo stable ebuild - 20050111-r1 The program I am running is: MPLAB-C18-Student-Edition-v2_40-win32.exe When I try to run it I get an error from the installer: "An internal error has occured attempting to create the time stamp for MPLAB C18 v2.40 Demo. Please contact Microchip for assistance. (Error

On 7/15/19 1:22 PM, Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:02 PM Siva Chandra <sivachandra at google.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:32 AM Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: >>>> llvm-libc is an implementation of the C standard library targeting C11 >>>> and above. >>> Any particular reason for C11

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:43 PM Siva Chandra <sivachandra at google.com> wrote: > > > On 7/15/19 1:22 PM, Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:02 PM Siva Chandra <sivachandra at google.com> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:32 AM Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > > >>>> llvm-libc

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:45:48AM -0700, Bob Wilson wrote: > [CCing Dale since this was his change, not mine] > > The change in 81455 fixes a compiler crash. It doesn't happen very often, but I can't imagine we would want to back that out. Fixing it would be a more reasonable solution. From a quick look at it, the problem is that gcc/config/darwin-c.c is registering va_opt

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:32 AM Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > > llvm-libc is an implementation of the C standard library targeting C11 > > and above. > > Any particular reason for C11 as opposed to C17? Two reasons: 1. The C++17 standard refers to the C11 standard. 2. C11 is sufficiently modern while not closing doors for users requiring compliance

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:

Hello, I'm a bit new to the world of R so forgive my ignorance. I'm trying to do a zero-inflated negative binomial regression and have received an error message and i'm not sure what it means. I'm running R 2.5.1 on XP. I have just tried a really simple version of the model to see if it would run before I put all the variables in. I have attached all the variables to the

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias

[CC bollu, mferguson, shil] Am Do., 23. Mai 2019 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb Bardia Mahjour < bmahjour at ca.ibm.com>: > Thanks David and Michael for the clarification. > > I think I understand the rational behind those checks in delinearization > now. > > > Some other languages have stronger guarantees about their array > dimensions accesses being in range. But this being

MCI A1 A2 A13 A14 A23 A24 A33 A34 Grouped together 56766 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6459 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 31233

I have the following scenario: g729 gsm UAS <-----------> * <-----------> UAC I am using sipp to generate the calls between the UAC and the UAS and sending some rtp from the UAC, I want * to do transcoding but as I see it is not. As long as I know 'Attempting native bridge' means only passing-through the rtp ?Am I wrong? The UAC and UAS are

I've read too many articles and posts on "domain master browser", "computer master browser", "NT domain browser", "PDC and BDCs", etc. etc. and I've managed to confuse my shrinking brain over this. I apologize in advance if I'm posting a redundant question (I've looked thru archivers best I could) or posting to the wrong place.