similar to: [LLVMdev] How to send LLVM IR to a code generator backend

Dear LLVM experts! we would like to use BeignetBackend as and LLVM Target It shown in teh Beignet code there is a note "Well, the complete code base is somehow a compiler backend for LLVM. Here, we really speak about the final code generation passes that you may find in `src/backend`." http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet/Backend/compiler_backe nd/ But Beignet does not

i'd like to know if there is any plan or existing work to add a Aho's trig language like code generator generator? "...If you are starting a new port, we recommend that you write the instruction selector using the SelectionDAG infrastructure." any other things i should know before i write one? thank you.

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 07:15:03PM +0800, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > i'd like to know if there is any plan or existing work to add a Aho's > trig language like code generator generator? I'm not aware of either the trig language code generator nor any work to implement it in LLVM. > "...If you are starting a new port, we recommend that you write the > instruction

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stellard, Thomas > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 9:07 AM > To: Justin Holewinski > Cc: Villmow, Micah; Tom Stellard; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: R600, a new backend for AMD GPUs > > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:54:41AM -0700, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > On May 28, 2012 6:44 AM, "Tom Stellard"

Is there a version of the AMDIL back-end that is compatible with LLVM 3.0/3.1? On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stellard, Thomas > > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 9:07 AM > > To: Justin Holewinski > > Cc: Villmow, Micah; Tom Stellard; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:54:41AM -0700, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On May 28, 2012 6:44 AM, "Tom Stellard" <thomas.stellard at amd.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:37:26PM -0700, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > I have a higher-level question regarding this back-end. If I have an > LLVM > > >

On May 28, 2012 6:44 AM, "Tom Stellard" <thomas.stellard at amd.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:37:26PM -0700, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > I have a higher-level question regarding this back-end. If I have an LLVM > > IR module and run it through this back-end, it seems like the only output > > option is a binary

Hi, We've been working on an LLVM backend for the previous generation of AMD GPUs (HD 2XXX - HD 6XXX) and we would like submit it for inclusion in the main LLVM tree. The latest code can be found in this git repository: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tstellar/llvm/ in the r600-initial-review branch or if you prefer you can download the entire tree with this link:

I see the following warnings: cmds.c:934:13: warning: 'print_int_bool_list' defined but not used cmds.c:1093:13: warning: 'print_stat_list' defined but not used cmds.c:1124:13: warning: 'print_statvfs_list' defined but not used cmds.c:1171:13: warning: 'print_version_list' defined but not used This patch makes it so we don't emit the unused

Hi, I would like to nominate Martin Storsjö as code owner for MinGW changes in LLVM. -Tom

On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:37:37AM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:50:07PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We've been working on an LLVM backend for the previous generation of AMD > > GPUs (HD 2XXX - HD 6XXX) and we would like submit it for inclusion in the > > main LLVM tree. The latest code can be found in this git

Sorry about the formatting... Anyway, I think there may be a misinterpretation of bound_cntl. My understanding is that: 0 => if the source is invalid or disabled, do not write a result 1 => if the source is invalid or disabled, use a 0 instead So the problematic case is where bound_cntl is 0, not when it is 1. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Stellard [mailto:tstellar at redhat.com]

Tom, Two things. One is missing tests. I have some I could send you, but they are mainly OpenCL based for the AMDIL backend, not for the R600. That brings me to the second thing. Are the AMDIL backend and the R600 backend the same, or not? At this point, they really do feel like they are separate back ends, with one dependent on the other. As there is no other backend that is dependent on

Hi Tom, I have a higher-level question regarding this back-end. If I have an LLVM IR module and run it through this back-end, it seems like the only output option is a binary format. Is this a device binary, or another intermediate format? If the input LLVM IR module was a compute kernel, how would I go about executing it on an AMD GPU? Can I use the APP SDK to load the binary, perhaps

One final set: cmds.c:968:13: warning: 'print_lvm_pv' defined but not used cmds.c:1012:13: warning: 'print_lvm_vg' defined but not used cmds.c:1055:13: warning: 'print_lvm_lv' defined but not used cmds.c:1142:13: warning: 'print_dirent' defined but not used cmds.c:1196:13: warning: 'print_xattr' defined but not used cmds.c:1220:13:

On 06/13/2017 07:33 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2017, at 17:23, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2017 08:03 PM, Connor Abbott wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> On

I am proud to announce that AMD is Open Sourcing AMDIL Code Generator for LLVM 2.9. While this version is not for uptake into LLVM mainline, it does build and is compatible with LLVM 2.9. This is the first step of the process, so I know there will be issues that show up. In the next few months, we will be providing more unit tests and an LLVM 3.0 compatible version, and finally a TOT version for

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:50:07PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > We've been working on an LLVM backend for the previous generation of AMD > GPUs (HD 2XXX - HD 6XXX) and we would like submit it for inclusion in the > main LLVM tree. The latest code can be found in this git repository: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tstellar/llvm/ in the r600-initial-review > branch

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:37:26PM -0700, Justin Holewinski wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I have a higher-level question regarding this back-end. If I have an LLVM > IR module and run it through this back-end, it seems like the only output > option is a binary format. Is this a device binary, or another > intermediate format? > > If the input LLVM IR module was a compute kernel,

On 06/14/2017 05:05 PM, Connor Abbott wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: >> On 06/13/2017 07:33 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote: >>> >>>> On Jun 12, 2017, at 17:23, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 06/12/2017 08:03 PM, Connor