similar to: [LLVMdev] Analysis Groups in Mainline LLVM

Forgot to reply to the list. -- John T. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MAJOR API CHANGE: Pass initialization without static constructors Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:05:21 -0500 From: John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> To: Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> On 10/8/10 1:29 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > Hello fellow LLVM-ers, > > As

Hello fellow LLVM-ers, As those of you who follow llvm-commits have probably noticed, I've been hard at work reworking our pass infrastructure to perform pass initialization/registration without static constructors. This is a boon for clients of the LLVM libraries, as they can now control when and if initialization occurs, as opposed to being forced to incur the initialization cost at

Thank you, I tried to compile it with llvm 3.4 through these commands: petsas at shinigami:~/software/poolalloc$ ./configure --with-llvmsrc=/home/petsas/software/llvm --with-llvmobj=/home/petsas/software/llvm petsas at shinigami:~/software/poolalloc$ make but I'm getting get this error: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/petsas/software/poolalloc/lib' make[2]: Entering directory

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:30 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > Dear Petsas, > > For analyzing indirect function calls, your best bet is probably to use > the CallGraph analysis pass that is part of DSA. DSA is included in the > poolalloc code; you can get directions on downloading poolalloc from the > SVA web page:

Thanks Everyone for the info. I am planning to work with DSA on llvm-2.9. Hope it is working as John mentioned. Manish On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:06 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 9/19/11 9:12 PM, Manish Gupta wrote: > > Dear All, > > I am curious to know the reason for removal of andersen pointer analysis. > Is it because of some issues? We

The README at the location shared by John says "DSA is undergoing significant changes and may not be entirely stable or correct. See lib/DSA/README" So, I was wondering from where should one pick the code. Although I will start my analysis and see how results turn out to be. But any comments on this line will be helpful. Thanks Manish On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Manish Gupta

On 9/9/11 1:08 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Are there any plans to add CMake support to the build of > SAFECode? No, there are no current plans to do so. Is not having CMake support a show-stopper for you? I imagine adding support for it would be straightforward. > Also are there any current instructions for building > llvm/clang with SAFECode support from current svn? Yes.

On 4/30/13 1:10 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: >> On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel >>> developer, >>> Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm

Thanks John. I verified that and poolalloc builds with LLVM 3.0. I used clang for compiling wxWidgets, LLVM 3.0 and poolalloc. But llvm-tv build still gives build error. I take it that llvm-tv is still incompatible with these versions of poolalloc and LLVM 3.0. I think the code is manageable - couple of files in lib,include and some 30 odd small files in tools directory. I'll have a look at

On 9/19/11 9:12 PM, Manish Gupta wrote: > Dear All, > > I am curious to know the reason for removal of andersen pointer > analysis. Is it because of some issues? We need it on llvm-2.9, if > possible. > > Do we have some better version of pointer analysis on llvm-2.9? The Data Structure Analysis pass (DSA) is a unification-style points-to analysis. It should work with

I fixed all the other build errors. This is the only one pending. On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:33 PM, AbhishekR <abhishekr1982 at gmail.com> wrote: > I fixed most of the errors. > > There is a weird error I am seeing and seems to be some incompatibility in > expanding macros between FileSystem.h in LLVM and intl.h in wxWidgets. Any > idea how to fix this? > > In file

I fixed most of the errors. There is a weird error I am seeing and seems to be some incompatibility in expanding macros between FileSystem.h in LLVM and intl.h in wxWidgets. Any idea how to fix this? In file included from /home/arhishee/work/llvm-tv/llvm-tv/tools/llvm-tv/GraphDrawer.cpp:4: In file included from /home/arhishee/work/llvm-tv/llvm30/include/llvm/Support/FileUtilities.h:18: In file

Dear all, I am not sure whether this is a right place to ask basic questions about usage of CLang/LLVM, but also not sure if there is any other mailing list for such. Kindly point me to such a list in such case. I had built mainline CLang/LLVM on OSX and tried to use it with CMake. I had override following variables in CMake:

On 10/7/11 11:56 PM, Jiesheng Wei wrote: > Hi, > > This is Jiesheng Wei from UBC. Now I am working on a project with LLVM > and I want to use steensgaard alias analysis tool. I saw on the website > that steensgaard analysis is available for LLVM 2.9 and it is under > poolalloc/ directory. I downloaded several versions but none of them is > compatible with LLVM 2.9. Can you

Dear All, Thanks to the testing done by Bill Wendling, we have the following list of regressions for PPC: TEST (cbe) 'exception_spec_test' FAILED! ******************** TEST (cbe) 'function_try_block' FAILED! ******************** Oopack (jit, llc, and cbe) also fails, but I don't know if that's a regression or not. I'm alright with releasing with these regressions

On 6/1/12 7:33 PM, AbhishekR wrote: > I am trying to compile llvm-tv as per the instructions from the link - > http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/television/trunk/README.txt > > The poolalloc doesn't seem to be in synch with the llvm svn version > mentioned (78786). It is giving lot of errors during compilation. I > fixed a few of them by bringing in functions/header files

Hi everyone, I am wondering what is the right way to register an alias analysis pass. My alias analysis pass is implemented in a dynamic load module. As I can see, a general way to register a pass looks like: llvm::RegisterPass<Analyzer> X("rci", "RCI Pass"); However, registering a type-based analysis uses: INITIALIZE_AG_PASS(...) I think, registering an

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Vladimir A. Merzliakov wrote: > I have some problems with build current CVS version LLVM using GCC 4.1.0 (GCC > CVS mainline version). Thanks! > 1) Build terminate with error: > > llvm[3]: Compiling SparcV8CodeEmitter.cpp for Debug build > /usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/lib/Target/SparcV8/SparcV8GenCodeEmitter.inc:11: > error: definition of

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel >> developer, >> Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. >> >> In Linux world, traditionally

Kevin Streit wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still using the release_26 version of Poolalloc/DSA with llvm 2.6 for my analyses and am currently trying to switch to llvm 2.7 for several reasons. I tried to use the trunk of the poolalloc svn repository with the llvm 2.7 release which is working fine for most of the programs I ran it on so far but for sqlite it's running into a stack overflow