similar to: [LLVMdev] mixed address space pointer sizes

Doh! hit send too soon, patch attached. > -----Original Message----- > From: Villmow, Micah > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:17 AM > To: 'Eli Friedman' > Cc: LLVM Developers Mail > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] FW: RFC: Supporting different sized address space > arithmetic > > Eli, > Here is the first of many patches that adds support for specifying >

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:03 PM >> To: Villmow, Micah >> Cc: LLVM Developers Mail >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] FW: RFC: Supporting different sized address space >>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:43 PM >> To: Villmow, Micah >> Cc: LLVM Developers Mail >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] FW: RFC: Supporting different sized address space >>

On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:58:54 -0700 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Villmow, Micah > <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:43 PM > >> To: Villmow,

The reason why I say it should be done in a separate branch is that the final design is not necessarily the same as the first initial implementation. There are things that will break and this kind of change touches almost everything, not just the core LLVM libraries. It is hard to get right the first time, and developing it in a sandbox will dramatically decrease the amount of churn that will show

> -----Original Message----- > From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:43 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: LLVM Developers Mail > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] FW: RFC: Supporting different sized address space > arithmetic > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> > wrote: > >

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > If I don't bring in TargetData, then there is no way for me to verify the address space size in the verifier or in the auto-upgrade mechanisms. And that's why I didn't like this approach in the first place. -Eli >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eli Friedman

We can't add a circular dependency between Target and VMCore. -Eli On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > Ping! > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Villmow, Micah >> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 4:12 PM >> To: 'Chris Lattner'; 'Mon Ping Wang' >> Cc: 'llvm-commits at

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:34:52 -0700 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Villmow, Micah > <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > > If I don't bring in TargetData, then there is no way for me to > > verify the address space size in the verifier or in the > > auto-upgrade mechanisms. > > And that's why I

Ping! > -----Original Message----- > From: Villmow, Micah > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 4:12 PM > To: 'Chris Lattner'; 'Mon Ping Wang' > Cc: 'llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu'; 'llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu' > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Proposal: New IR instruction for casting between > address spaces > > Resending since I got an error. >

> -----Original Message----- > From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 3:16 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: Supporting different sized address space > arithmetic > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> > wrote: > >

If I don't bring in TargetData, then there is no way for me to verify the address space size in the verifier or in the auto-upgrade mechanisms. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 2:32 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: Chris Lattner; Mon Ping Wang; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; > llvmdev at

Hi, On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dan Gohman [mailto:gohman at apple.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:28 PM >> To: Villmow, Micah >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Proposal: New IR instruction for casting between >> address spaces >> >>

> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Gohman [mailto:gohman at apple.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:28 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Proposal: New IR instruction for casting between > address spaces > > On Sep 11, 2012, at 1:03 PM, "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> > wrote: >

On Sep 12, 2012, at 2:45 PM, "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mon P Wang [mailto:monping at apple.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:12 PM >> To: Villmow, Micah >> Cc: Dan Gohman; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Proposal: New IR instruction for

> -----Original Message----- > From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:03 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: LLVM Developers Mail > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] FW: RFC: Supporting different sized address space > arithmetic > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> > wrote: > >

> -----Original Message----- > From: Mon P Wang [mailto:monping at apple.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:12 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: Dan Gohman; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Proposal: New IR instruction for casting between > address spaces > > Hi, > > On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > > > > >

> -----Original Message----- > From: Mon Ping Wang [mailto:monping at apple.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:55 AM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Proposal: New IR instruction for casting between > address spaces > > > On Sep 12, 2012, at 2:45 PM, "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> >

> -----Original Message----- > From: Michele Scandale [mailto:michele.scandale at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 11:41 PM > To: Micah Villmow > Cc: James Courtier-Dutton; LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Address space extension > > Hi Micah, > > On 08/10/2013 06:01 AM, Micah Villmow wrote: > > Michele, > > Why can not

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:25:50 +0000 "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > Most likely this code was added before getSExtOrTruncate was added, > but not 100% sure. It seems to assume that no pointer can be more > than 64bits in size. Does LLVM generally support pointers of greater than 64 bits? -Hal > > > -----Original Message----- > >