similar to: [LLVMdev] Rename GEP to...

Hello DearI used modifiedmk package for trend analyses.this is my script ?require(modifiedmk)X1<-read.table("c:/elham/first article/r/Spring_NDVI-1.txt",skip=2,header=FALSE)d=dim(X1) outMK<-matrix(-999,nrow=4,ncol=d[2])for (c in

FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> writes: >> Have we made any progress on a potential git conversion? AFAIK the only >> outstanding technical issue is the monotonic revision number question. >> Personally, I have no nead for them but others have expressed >> reservation about losing them. > > There are very decent solutions to the monotonic revnum issue

> Have we made any progress on a potential git conversion? AFAIK the only > outstanding technical issue is the monotonic revision number question. > Personally, I have no nead for them but others have expressed > reservation about losing them. There are very decent solutions to the monotonic revnum issue (git describe, hooks/tagging), so that shouldn't hold back the transition.

Hi, If I have an instance of DISubprogram, can I get the debug info of local variables of the function, including parameters? I tried to use the getVariables() function defined in DISubprogram, but it seemed to return an empty DIArray node when I ran my pass alone using opt. Do I need to enable any other analysis passes in order to populate the data? My related snippet of code is like the

On Jun 6, 2008, at 03:04, Evan Cheng wrote: > On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:33 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: >> >>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> >>>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: >>>> >>>>> On May 29, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at

On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:17 PM, lu zhao <luzhao at cs.utah.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > If I have an instance of DISubprogram, can I get the debug info of local > variables of the function, including parameters? > > I tried to use the getVariables() function defined in DISubprogram, but it > seemed to return an empty DIArray node when I ran my pass alone using opt. > Do I

+llvmdev because I accidentally dropped it On Nov 3, 2013 6:57 AM, "David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > You're welcome to provide a patch or I might get to it myself. Also this > should be described in http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html if > it isn't already > On Nov 3, 2013 12:11 AM, "lu zhao" <luzhao at cs.utah.edu>

I'm having trouble restructuring data from the rwars package into a dataframe. Can someone help me? Here's what I have... library("rwars") library("tidyverse") # These data are json, so they load into R as a list people <- get_all_people(parse_result = T) people <- get_all_people(getElement(people, "next"), parse_result = T) # Look at Anakin

Looking through TOT sources, I don't see anything that would provide def/use chains (or equivalent information) post register allocation. I would like to write some peeps to clean up various target-specific things but for safety I will need such information. Is such an analysis pass available somewhere that I've missed? If not, is there a better way to find all uses of a defined value

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Talin wrote: > > Just a follow up on this - I am still having problems, I never did figure > out a solution. (I've been running with debug off for the last month so that > I could get work done.) > > Here's what I am seeing: I am definitely calling

Dear Wizards - Thank you so much for your help. That was exactly what I was looking for. Now, I have been working on conditional selection of columns in a data frame. My goal is to calculate the total revenue per sales representative per status in a table. I have come to a complete stop: Let's say, we have a data.frame called df with several columns and a number of rows: df <-

Hi OpenSSH peeps! I have looked around a few man pages and the usual sources of information but I can't seem to find a way to only forward specific identities to some hosts. What I would really like to have is a way to only forward the identity that gave me a successful auth: % ls ~/.ssh | grep .pub id_ecdsa.pub id_ed25519.pub id_rsa.pub % cat .ssh/config Host example.com:

> That's what we need to have a discussion about. If those things will > work for people, great. If not, we have some stuff to figure out. Agreed. Hopefully core peeps will chime in. >> I suppose it's merely a manpower thing now > > I'm not assuming that given the volume of e-mail around this. Sending mail is cheap. Switching to git completely isn't.

Why can it not find my object? What am i missing here? Here is my code: require ''rexml/document'' include REXML # classes to represent the objects and relationships in the xml file class Article attr_accessor :id, :post, :archive, :ntype, :head, :blurb, :body, :fblurb, :fimage, :att, :source, :copy, :brand end # the base parser class BaseXMLParser def initialize(filename)

In principle a good idea, but I'm not sure the whereabouts of Catherine Loader are known at this point. Last peeps from her on the net seem to be about a decade old. .pd > On 18 May 2020, at 10:31 , Abby Spurdle <spurdle.a at gmail.com> wrote: > > This has come up before. > > Here's the last time: > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2019-March/077478.html

Have we made any progress on a potential git conversion? AFAIK the only outstanding technical issue is the monotonic revision number question. Personally, I have no nead for them but others have expressed reservation about losing them. Can we have a discussion about that to identify the core tasks currently needing monotnic revision numbers and how they might be accomplished under git?

Renato Golin wrote: > Hi all, > > It's been a long time, and I'm probably going to kill myself, but I > want to try it anyway. I don't think that turning off folding of constants is the right place to start. To implement this, start by adding new constants that are going to replace the existing ones. A good rule of thumb is "whatever the relocations in a given

On Jun 15, 2012, at 2:54 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > Looking through TOT sources, I don't see anything that would provide > def/use chains (or equivalent information) post register allocation. I > would like to write some peeps to clean up various target-specific > things but for safety I will need such information. > > Is such an analysis pass available somewhere that

Hi, I''m having major trouble with a somewhat self-referencing has_many and belongs_to set of models. item.manufacturer correctly returns an object of type Vendor. However, item.manufacturer.name raises an exception even though the name value is set correctly. I''ve been debugging and googling and responding to stack overflow peeps but still to no avail. Complete details here:

On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Talin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Talin wrote: > >> Just a follow up on this - I am still having problems, I never did figure out a solution. (I've been running with debug off for the last month so that I could get work done.) >> >>