Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] trunk fails ctest on X86_64 Linux"
2011 Jan 07
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] compiler-rt patch for clean build on Solaris 10 / x86
Hi,
Attached is small patch (based of r122998 of compiler-rt), required for clean builds on Solaris 10 / x86 using clang 2.8.
Please consider it for inclusion.
Cheers,
Joakim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: solaris_stdint.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 457 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2011 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt compile problem for 32bit OS X
I'm running into a compile problem with commit 131656 of compiler-rt.
I'm compiling llvm with:
$ CXX='g++ -m32' CC='gcc -m32' CFLAGS=-m32 CXXFLAGS=-m32 LDFLAGS=-m32
./configure --disable-bindings --{build,host,target}=i686-apple-darwin
--enable-targets=x86,x86_64,cbe --enable-optimized
$ make
$ make install
It will eventually error out with:
2014 Mar 23
2
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt CMake build
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH is a convenient mechanism for exposing prebuilt
> install directories to a CMake build. It contains a colon-separated
> list of paths. Each path points to a directory that contains
> directory names that are meaningful to CMake, including
2016 May 06
2
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt
That's great. For multi targets compilerrt-rts, in old llvm 3.5 configuremakefileconfigure/makefile system, it will build multiple libs for each target on the target list pass to clang building. but since you said compiler-rt now require sysroot for proper headers, then I don't think multi libs can be built together any more. However, according to my knowledge, without compiler-rt, a
2012 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's
2012 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's unittest suite in
> CMake. This is ... quite challenging.
>
> I think I can get it to work with one significant caveat: it will require
> manual dependency management. None of the automatic header tracking. I
> think this is fine
2012 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kostya
2012 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
>
>> Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's unittest suite in
>> CMake. This is ... quite challenging.
>>
>> I think I can get it to work with one significant
2012 Jun 26
2
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM,
2012 Jun 25
4
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's unittest suite in
CMake. This is ... quite challenging.
I think I can get it to work with one significant caveat: it will require
manual dependency management. None of the automatic header tracking. I
think this is fine in some cases, and not so fine in other cases. Let me
explain.
It feels like these tests are really comprised of two
2012 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
And one more question regarding ASan cmake build.
Currently unittests are fine, but regular "clang -faddress-sanitizer" is
not:
current cmake build stores libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a together with all the
LLVM libs
(in $build_path/lib/libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a), but the Clang driver looks
for asan runtime
in clang resource dir:
2012 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote:
> And one more question regarding ASan cmake build.
> Currently unittests are fine, but regular "clang -faddress-sanitizer" is
> not:
>
As a side note: I don't like that the current cmake machinery builds asan
tests by explicitly passing libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a.
IMO it needs to use
2012 Feb 28
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] atomic functions on darwin
Hi,
Some time in the last few weeks I noticed my cmake build of
svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 start to warn about atomics being unavailable
and thus building thread-unsafe. I just looked into it and found an easy
solution, using the atomic functions in <libkern/OSAtomic.h> in
/usr/include. The attached patch does this and also modifies the cmake
and autoconf tests to 'pass'
2009 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BlocksRuntime updates for Linux
There's an Apple internal bug for that. I've cloned it to Bugzilla as:
<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5034> Implement
__builtin_eh_return_data_regno()
I can probably make the cmake configure stage fail up front if none of
the supported mechanisms are found. I'll look at that. Thanks for the
feedback!
Shantonu
Sent from my MacBook
On Sep 22, 2009, at 9:01 PM,
2009 Sep 23
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BlocksRuntime updates for Linux
Clang does indeed built it with one warning.
[ 55%] Building C object
lib/CMakeFiles/CompilerRT-Common.dir/gcc_personality_v0.c.o
/export/home/edward/lab/llvm/build/compiler-rt/lib/gcc_personality_v0.c:232:36:
warning: implicit declaration of function
'__builtin_eh_return_data_regno' is invalid in C99
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
_Unwind_SetGR(context,
2007 Nov 01
1
ctest package
Hi Sir
I did find ctest package from CRAN.
Where it can be found?
Regards
--
AMINA SHAHZADI
Department of Statistics
GC University Lahore, Pakistan.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
1999 Jan 28
1
bug in the ctest package: binom.test
R 0630 for windows
> library(ctest)
> binom.test(7,10,p=0.3, alternative="two.sided")
returns a p-value of =< 2.2e-016 and a warning
In Splus 3.4
> binom.test(7,10,p=0.3, alternative="two.sided")
returns a p-value of 0.0106
I think it is the
max(v[v<=(1+eps)*PVAL]) causing the problem...
max() of an empty vector.......
Mai Z
1999 Mar 30
1
ctest wishlist
In the past months (maybe even years), I have received a variety of
suggestions on improving/extending/... my ctest package. Some of the
wishes have already been fulfilled. In the future, I will at least:
* provide a formula-based interface
* provide an option for controlling the behavior of 2-sided p-values
(sum of more extreme, tail balancing a la S-PLUS, double one-sided, mid
p-value,
2000 Feb 24
1
fisher.test() in ctest or perhaps uniroot() (PR#455)
fisher.test(matrix(c(1,20,246,6873),2),hybrid=F)
Error in if (f(lower, ...) * f(upper, ...) >= 0) stop("f() values at end
points not of opposite sign") :
missing value where logical needed
Thomas Lumley
Assistant Professor, Biostatistics
University of Washington, Seattle
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list --
2002 Dec 04
1
documentation bug in (ctest) chisq.test (PR#2346)
chisq.test with simulate.p.value=TRUE uses the Patefield algorithm, this
is not documented, and the original reference is not given, as it ought
to be. The reference is:
Patefield,W. M. (1981) An efficient method of generating r * c tables
with given row and column totals (algorithm AS 159). Applied Statistics
30, 91-97.
Kjetil Halvorsen