similar to: [LLVMdev] What are armv7f and armv7k?

Legal... really? :( What a shame. I'll wait patiently, unless I can get a download link... :-D Don't wanna anger legal though... Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 W: 765-889-4756 x2 C: 765-464-9893 jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com> www.arxan.com On Oct 17, 2011, at 10:20 AM, James Molloy

I see, so perhaps the LLVM ARM Backend is in need of a method of organizing volunteer qualifiers, as releases near? Has this generally been organized via this mailing list? Joe Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 W: 765-889-4756 x2 C: 765-464-9893 jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com>

Thanks for your response, that's kinda what I've gathered over the years. I was hoping that the Xcode project would have "just worked". I'll keep piece-mealing it together, and hope that it works. I'll try to post a radar. Joe Joe Abbey Director of S/W Development Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 W: 765-889-4756 x2 C:

Renato, I was wondering when the videos might be uploaded. The slide material is great! Thanks! Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 W: 765-889-4756 x2 C: 765-464-9893 jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com> www.arxan.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I've got a couple spare machines I'd like to enlist in build bot. I'm told that the llvm lab folks are the go-to group. I've got a couple machines prepped, I just need to register their names and passwords (I think). Let me know what else I need to do! Thanks, Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 W:

Hi Joe, I can answer that, as I'm dealing with it J The videos are stuck currently with our legal department. They've gotten extremely sensitive over it and we have had to get Tanya/Chris to agree to a secure dropbox so we can send the videos to them to put on the website (binaries don't live in SVN). Obviously Tanya is very busy with the release at the moment, so it's

Looks like pinsr is not being generated on llvm-x86_64-ubuntu... jabbey at davinci:~$ /home/jabbey/src/osuosl/buildbot/sandbox/llvm-x86_64-ubuntu/llvm-x86_64-ubuntu/llvm/Debug+Asserts/bin/llc < /home/jabbey/src/osuosl/buildbot/sandbox/llvm-x86_64-ubuntu/llvm-x86_64-ubuntu/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/mmx-pinsrw.ll -mtriple=x86_64-linux -mattr=+mmx,+sse2 produces: .file "<stdin>"

On 14.01.2012, at 17:23, Joe Abbey wrote: > I have a need to build ld from source to understand an assert(0). > > I got excited when I found that ld64 on the opensource portal contains an xcodeproj > > http://opensource.apple.com/source/ld64/ld64-127.2/ > > But... it seems like I'm lacking mach-o/arm/reloc.h, and dyld_priv.h. > > I'm doing my best to stitch

Mac G4. The non-POD stuff was cleared out by Michael Spencer's refactoring of llmv-objdump. Thanks Michael! Now I just have to figure out how to get Debug+Asserts to build on Mac G4. Cheers, Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 W: 765-889-4756 x2 C: 765-464-9893 jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com>

I have a need to build ld from source to understand an assert(0). I got excited when I found that ld64 on the opensource portal contains an xcodeproj http://opensource.apple.com/source/ld64/ld64-127.2/ But... it seems like I'm lacking mach-o/arm/reloc.h, and dyld_priv.h. I'm doing my best to stitch it all together, but if anyone has any pointers to make this less painful, it would be

It appears Mr. Cheng may be busy, so perhaps someone here knows? I've been debugging a code generator bug that surfaced while trying to build tinyXML for ARM with LLVM 2.8. The bug seems to originate in DAGCombiner. LLVM 2.9 still has this bug, but top of trunk does not. To narrow down what change fixed it, I've used a binary search of revisions from 2.9 to top of trunk. The

What a shame. Any chance of getting his slides posted? I thought they were really informative, and captured the history of the project nicely. Thanks! Joe Joe Abbey Director of S/W Development Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 jabbey at arxan.com www.arxan.com On Jan 3, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > No. > > -Tanya > >

Galina, Please apply the following patch Index: master/config/builders.py =================================================================== --- master/config/builders.py (revision 143312) +++ master/config/builders.py (working copy) @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ {'name': "llvm-ppc-darwin", 'slavenames':["arxan_bellini"],

No. -Tanya On Jan 3, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: > Tanya, > > Was there any video taken of Chris's keynote? > > Joe > > Joe Abbey > Director of S/W Development > Arxan Technologies, Inc. > 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 > West Lafayette, IN 47906 > jabbey at arxan.com > www.arxan.com > > On Jan 3, 2012, at

Well how about as a strawman... taking some options from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ARM_microprocessor_cores and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_applications_of_ARM_cores LLVM Supports: ARMv4T -> ARM7TDMI ARMv5TE -> ARM926EJ-S -> XScale ARMv6 -> ARM1136J(F)-S ARMv6ZK -> ARM1176JZ(F)-S ARMv7A -> Cortex-A8 Cortex-A9 ARMv7M -> Cortex-M3

I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycle. If we can divide the bugs among the maintainers and establish a requirement that all open ARM bugs must be

On Oct 13, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran wrote: > I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycle. If we can divide the bugs among the maintainers

I'm the code owner of LLVM codegen and targets. I'm also the one of main developers on the original ARM target. That means, I would make the decisions on major development on ARM target if there are decisions to be made. But my role is very different from what people are looking for in this thread. To properly qualify a target like ARM which are supported on many different CPUs and

Galina, Looks like the build bots have frozen. Expected? Joe Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com> www.arxan.com<http://www.arxan.com/> On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Galina Kistanova wrote: Author: gkistanova Date: Fri Nov 18 13:49:26 2011 New Revision: 144978

I'm so close to having LLVM build on PowerPC. If there's any PowerPC experts, help? Lines like this: outs() << "[" << format("%2d", i) << "]" << "(sec " << format("%2d", int16_t(symbol->SectionNumber)) << ")" << "(fl 0x" <<