similar to: [LLVMdev] Licensing requirements

On Jul 5, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: > My impression from reading http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#clp > is that it's intended to be possible to compile programs using llvm and > distribute the resulting binaries freely. This does not seem to be the case. > > I'm assuming no portion of LLVM is included in the compiled binaries, > only the

On 07/06/2011 05:13 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jul 5, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: >> The runtime library components state that they are licensed under >> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php which does not >> contain a specific clause regarding binary redistribution. This seems to >> have been interpreted as not placing any restrictions

On Jul 6, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: >>> Is it sufficient to include the MIT copyright notices from >>> http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk/LICENSE.TXT / >>> http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/LICENSE.TXT for programs >>> compiled with LLVM? (Probably including the respective CREDITS.TXT files >>> as a

On 07/06/2011 07:10 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jul 6, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: > >>> There is no need to include any notices in the binaries of an application built with clang, or some with some other application that links to the LLVM runtime libraries that are dual licensed. >> Thanks for your response. Is this ability to distribute binaries without

On 07/07/2011 02:25 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > I, and many other reasonable people, consider the phrase: > > "The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software." > > ... to be talking about *copies of the software*. A binary is not a copy of the software, it is a lump of bits derived from it. >

On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: > On 07/06/2011 07:10 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: >> >>>> There is no need to include any notices in the binaries of an application built with clang, or some with some other application that links to the LLVM runtime libraries that are dual licensed.

Hi, If I write LLVM bindings for a language X, in which I obviously need to at least use parts of the llvm-c headers (constants, enums, typedefs, function names and signatures) do I need to include the LLVM copyright notice? Whereas llvm-c has multiple headers (e.g. Analysis.h, BitReader.h, Core.h, etc.) my bindings only have three files constants.d, types.d and functions.d which respectively

Hello, I am developing a game engine which will support Ogg Vorbis playback. If I were to use LibOgg and LibVorbis, would I then have to release my own product under BSD, thus requiring anyone who created games with it to do the same and reference Xiph.org in their game's credits? While I can definitely include a license file with my library, enforcing my own end-users to do the same would be

Hello there, My situation is as follows: =we make commercial freeware/shareware games =our games are released without code and can NOT be modified or have projects based on it. =would like to use Speex functions (library) within the game for some vocal sound effects, it would basically be a part of the EXE itself. Under the Xiph.org license, it states: "Redistributions in binary form must

Hi all, Now that we’ve settled on the license legalese to get to, we need to start the process of relicensing. We’re still sorting through all of the details of what this will take, but the first step is clear: new contributions to LLVM will need to be under both the old license structure and the new one (until the old structure is completely phased out). From a mechanical perspective, this is

Hi, everyone, I've been fielding an increasing number of questions about how our code-review process in LLVM works from people who are new to our community, and it's been pointed out to me that our documentation on code reviews is both out of date and not as helpful as it could be to new developers.   http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#code-reviews I would like to compose a

Hi Rafael, We’ve discussed why a license change is preferable over the span of several years now. I’m happy to explain over the phone, contact me off list and we can talk. -Chris > On Aug 10, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I still don't see any justification in the text why a license change is >

Hello. If anyone can point me in the right direction on this problem I would be very greatful. I was hoping there was a "newbie" list but didn't see one. If there is a more appropriate list for this question, please let me know. I am running samba on linux, with mac and windows clients using two different samba shares, one password protected and one with no password. Once in a

This has already been discussed extensively in the public. The threads are available in the archives. -Chris > On Aug 10, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, but I really don't think a private conversation is appropriate > for such discussions. > > If the motive cannot be explained in public I have no choice

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:22:24AM -0600, Jonathan Roelofs wrote: > IIUC, you don't want to cross compile llvm itself (which is what those > instructions are for), but instead you want to *use* llvm to cross compile > things. > > To build your sysroot, you'll need to cross-build: > > 1) A libc. Good choices for that for baremetal are: newlib or musl. > 2)

Hello, I cannot get JGR installed. Here is what I have tried so far http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/R 1. sudo -s # root werden R CMD javareconf root at gunnar-laptop:~# R CMD javareconf Java interpreter : /usr/bin/java Java version : 1.5.0_18 Java home path : /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.18/jre Java compiler : /usr/bin/javac Java headers gen.: /usr/bin/javah Java archive

Hi All Just received my first 7905G from a distributer here in Sweden. According to the spec this phone should be able to use SIP. Now I been looking on Ciscos home pages for several hours trying to find a "SIP image" for this phone. No luck at all, need special access to be able to download software to this phone. Is it the fact, that I have to pay for a contract of some kind to be

Hallo Zusammen, hatte gestern die Schnauze voll von Vista und habe mir daraufhin Ubuntu installiert. Bin also mit Ubuntu ?berhaupt nicht vertraut. Nun habe ich ohne Erfolg versucht, R zu installieren. Soweit ich der Anleitung folgen konnte habe ich es so wie auf http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/R gemacht. Im Terminal kann ich R problemlos starten. Allerdings bei der Installation von

Hi, Is there a kind of scope mechanism in the instruction lowering pattern language in order to control where instructions are inserted or how they are later reordered during the SelectionDiag linearization? I know the glue chain that stick instructions together. But such mechanism in not provided in instruction lowering pattern. I'm facing many situations where some patterns are lowered into

Hi there, I searched in mailinglist and in web, but no answer to my problem... Only this post with no answers: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-March/038994.html I'm using CVS Asterisk (05/17/04) with chan_capi 0.3.1. (multiple controller support). In my Asterisk-box there are 2 Fritzcards (module for second card compiled with changes on sourcecode found in the web).