similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-ld and native executables

I just tried cmake for the first time and it mostly worked. I had been using autotools to configure. With cmake configure environment when I try to do: make TESTSUITE=CodeGen/mblaze check it runs the whole test suite. Under autotools it would just run the mblaze tests. Is there an equivalent command in a camke configured environment or is this broken? I know nothing about cmake so I'm

Can someone explain how the condition code is passed from the MBlazeTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC to MBlazeTargetLowering::EmitCustomSelect custom inserter? In LowerSELECT_CC the condition code is never accessed (Op.GetOperand(4)) and I don't see how it ends up getting correctly passed to the MBlazeTargetLowering::EmitCustomSelect. > SDValue

Hi, unfortunately, my build somehow hangs when linking clang binary and my system is in an unusable state. My toolchain is clang-3.8, gold-1.11 and LLVMgold.so from binutils v2.26.1 (both selfmade) and LTO-flag is enabled. My buildsystem uses cmake-3.6.0 and ninja-1.7.1 (both prebuilt). I have 52 last steps left in my 3rd build. My Linux-kernel is v3.13.0-92 from official Ubuntu repositories.

Hello, I've been trying to build some normal linux applications with clang and I keep running into a snag in configure scripts. Perhaps these scripts are not written very well, but the current clang behavior seems strange. When I run clang with the -emit-llvm option, it still uses /usr/bin/ld as the linker which fails to compile llvm bitcode on linux (though it works on mac). Here's a

On 7/19/10 10:36 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi JP, > > >> DAGCombiner::ReduceLoadWidth() does the following: >> /// ReduceLoadWidth - If the result of a wider load is shifted to right of N >> /// bits and then truncated to a narrower type and where N is a multiple >> /// of number of bits of the narrower type, transform it to a narrower load >> /// from

Hi Rafael, I've tried the LTO options with dragonegg, but I haven't had any luck getting it to work, I'm not sure if it is related to my installation of gold or my gcc configuration. I'm really interested in getting the resulting program as bitcode though. Will LTO do that for me? What I'm trying to do is build a bitcode version of libc that I can combine with a program and

How big is your project? LTO eats RAM even faster than chrome. For example linking clang with LTO could take 16GB of ram. Have you tried using LTO on your project on that machine, or is it your first time? Piotr On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at

On 11-06-28 10:45 PM, Gregory Malecha wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to build some normal linux applications with clang and I keep running into a snag in configure scripts. Perhaps these scripts are not written very well, but the current clang behavior seems strange. When I run clang with the -emit-llvm option, it still uses /usr/bin/ld as the linker which fails to compile llvm

Hi Gregory, > I've tried the LTO options with dragonegg, but I haven't had any luck getting it > to work, details? Ciao, Duncan. I'm not sure if it is related to my installation of gold or my gcc > configuration. > > I'm really interested in getting the resulting program as bitcode though. Will > LTO do that for me? What I'm trying to do is build a

2011/6/9 llvmjp <jpbonn-keyword-llvm.7c175e at corniceresearch.com>: > make TESTSUITE=CodeGen/mblaze check Are they useful to you? $ bin/llvm-lit -sv -jN test/CodeGen/MBlaze $ bin/llvm-lit -sv -jN /path/to/source/llvm/test/CodeGen/MBlaze/hogehoge.ll ...Takumi

On 26.01.2011, at 04:39, John McCall wrote: > On Jan 24, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Hendrix_ at gmx.net wrote: >> I was using "clang -O3 -S -emit-llvm" got some very optimized output. >> >> Then I did "clang -S -emit-llvm" (without optimization) and wanted to optimized the code in a >> separate pass. The llvm program "opt" did not do anything.

On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Hendrix_ at gmx.net wrote: > OK, I am looking for "LTO"/global optimization. So the function definition will remain "somewhere else" (externally), and the optimizer will find in some other module to possibly inline it later on. > > I am planning to concat all the *.ll (eg "link" the files) and pass them to the

Hi Duncan, On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Gregory, > > > I've tried the LTO options with dragonegg, but I haven't had any luck > getting it > > to work, > > details? > I think this is a misunderstanding on my part about what the dragonegg plugin is supposed to do. I am looking for something that will

Hello, I down loaded "llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux" and I built Spec2006 with it. It is great and except for one benchmark the rest work fine. I want to build them with LTO now. I followed the directions in " http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html" and built ar, nm-new, and ld-new in binutils. I also built libLLVMgold.so. I get the following error: llvm-gcc: -use-gold-plugin,

On 27.01.2011, at 21:12, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Hendrix_ at gmx.net wrote: > >> OK, I am looking for "LTO"/global optimization. So the function definition will remain "somewhere else" (externally), and the optimizer will find in some other module to possibly inline it later on. >> >> I am planning to concat all the

Hi, I am trying to use LLVM LTO. I read http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html and have some questions. Could anyone help? 1. Can LLVMgold.so work with BFD LD instead of gold? In the description of changes in binutils 2.20, "* The plugin target has been added to bfd. It can load the same shared objects used by gold and uses them to provide basic support for new file formats.".

Hi I followed the steps on http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html#lto-how-to-build to build the gold plugin on FreeBSD but ! Heres a link to the screenshot of the error: http://postimg.org/image/anlpuufbl/ This is the error message that it shows and so I am also unable to get ld-new. I checked and no CFLAGS were set in etc/make.conf. How to proceed with the installation? I am using the deault

r172749 removed Linker/LinkArchives.cpp and Linker/LinkItems.cpp citing: This code is dead, and the "right" way to get this support is to use the platform-specific linker-integrated LTO mechanisms, or the forthcoming LLVM linker. Could someone please expand on what the "right way" is and these LTO mechanisms or where I can find further information? We used several

On 21 July 2010 22:14, Reza Yazdani <ry.yazdani at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I down loaded "llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux" and I built Spec2006 with it. > It is great and except for one benchmark the rest work fine. I want to build > them with LTO now. I followed the directions in > "http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html" and built ar, nm-new, and

> On Jul 23, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Piotr Padlewski <prazek at google.com <mailto:prazek at google.com>> wrote: >> How big is your project? >> LTO eats RAM even faster than chrome. For example linking clang with LTO >>