similar to: [LLVMdev] Box removal

Hi There , Again ,I'm newbie to LLVM and please pardon me ..if you guys feel that ,the below question is very basic :) Here i go ,compiled the below sample with clang i.e *clang enum.c -S -emit-llvm* and there respective file are $ cat enum.c int main() { enum type{one=1,two,three} s; s = one; return s; } $ cat enum.s ; ModuleID = 'enum.c' target datalayout =

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Umesh Kalappa <umesh.kalappa0 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi There , > > Again ,I'm newbie to LLVM  and please pardon me ..if you guys  feel that > ,the below question is very basic :) > > Here i go ,compiled the below sample with clang i.e clang enum.c -S > -emit-llvm and there respective file are > > $ cat enum.c > int main()

So I now have a working first-order language that uses conventional boxing to handle polymorphism and with ints, floats and ('a -> 'a) functions. After a huge amount of detailed benchmarking in OCaml and F# I have decided that it is very important to be able to unbox complex numbers but no other compound types. As LLVM provides a vector type for power-of-two dimensionalities that

Is there any reason this generated code won't run in the Jit? I've pretty much got everything else working for my front end which all runs fin in the Jit but I can't get global arrays to work. ; ModuleID = 'test' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" target triple

I'm writing a JIT for my toy language, and I'm confused by one thing. How do I, with IR Builder, Insert a pointer constant? For the first version of my jit, I really only need LLVM to pass around opaque types and then pass those variables to C functions that return other opaque types. So for instance, I have a Int object that wraps the GNU GMP routines. A want to be able to tell IRBuilder

There seems to be some interest these days in OpenCL. However for some projects, a issue they face to adopting OpenCL is requirements of maintaining two source trees: one for normal C code (for use on systems without OpenCL support or poor OpenCL performance) and another for OpenCL. I am interested in using LLVM to create a OpenCL frontend for multicore CPUs. Now that the spec is out, we have a

I'd like to do some simple C# -> LLVM C API bindings for windows. Is there a place I can get pre-built LLVM .dlls for windows? Thanks Timothy -- “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.” (Robert Firth) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

On OSX I thought I'd try to optimize my compiler a bit by switching some of the calling conventions from CCallingConv to FastCC. The compiler ran fine, but when I executed the code, I got "Bad Instruction 4". I'm seeing some other mentions on this mailing list of issues like this on OSX (I'm using 10.8). Is there anything I need to change to enable fastcc with my compiler? I

I'm working on implementing a simple functional language in LLVM. It's statically typed, but I'd like to a have some simple multimethods involved. Does LLVM have some intrinsics for handling something like C++ vtables? Or do I need to implement my own way of handling single-dispatch functions? Thanks, Timothy -- “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was

I've asked every M$ expert I know, trolled through M$ TechNet, experimented with SRVANY/INSTSRV login scripts which hard-code username/passwords to login to a Samba 2.2.8a SMB server. I've experiment with and without the "Allow service to interact with Desktop" switch turned on. I am stuck. :( I can find no way to mount a share as a service, so that IIS can serve web-pages

Hello all. I just joined the list, because I am interested in NUA features of Samba3. I got the MySQL passdb backend working, but it still requires a Unix System account. I need to use fully virtualized user accounts. Re: the release of Samba3 and NUA capabilities I have found this: <snip> In the development of Samba-3, a number of requests were received to provide the ability to

On Nov 29, 2007, at 16:06, Jon Harrop wrote: > So I now have a working first-order language that uses conventional > boxing to handle polymorphism and with ints, floats and ('a -> 'a) > functions. Cool. > After a huge amount of detailed benchmarking in OCaml and F# I have > decided that it is very important to be able to unbox complex > numbers but no other

I am trying to do something which should seem very straightforward, not to mention, not unusual for load-balanced web servers, namely: providing a faceless/login-less mounting of SMB shares from NT4 and Win2K servers. Yes, I accept that I will need to stash a plaintext login key in some script or registry key. The security impacts are acceptable. I have the latest Samba 2.2.x server, and a

I need some advice on "forwarding" arguments to a callee. Suppose I have a function F that is called at the beginning of all other functions in the module. From F I need to access (read) the arguments passed to its immediate caller. Right now I do something like boxing all arguments in the caller inside a struct and passing a pointer to the struct to F, alongside an identifier

Hi! When I allocate memory for a structure, in _Znwm (operator new) function I need to specify size. How can I determine this information dynamically? ; ModuleID = '/tmp/webcompile/_12211_0.bc' target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple =

This is from 'early JIT tests' thread on comp.lang.misc. Given :- int ltst(int x) { int i, j; j=0; for(i=0; i<x; i++)j++; return(j); } This is from the online LLVM compiler. AND It does not seem to optimize it down ! ; ModuleID = '/tmp/webcompile/_24843_0.bc' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32" target endian = little target pointersize = 32 target triple =

The following C code : #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int TESTE2( int parami , int paraml ,double paramd ) { int varx=0,vary; int nI =0; //varx= parami; if( parami > 0 ) { varx = parami; vary = varx + 1; } else { varx = vary + 1; vary = paraml; } varx = varx + parami + paraml; for( nI = 1 ; nI <= paraml; nI++) { varx =

Hi Carlo, rather than declaring individual stack variables int x; int y; int z; and so on, which requires you to pass each one, or a pointer to each one, to your function, declare one stack variable of struct type that holds them all: struct StackObjects { int x; int y; int z; ... }; ... struct StackObjects stack; then pass the address of stack to your

Try using i64 indices with GEP > Is there any reason this generated code won't run in the Jit? > I've pretty much got everything else working for my front end > which all runs fin in the Jit but I can't get global arrays to work. > > ; ModuleID = 'test' > target datalayout = >

Hi, I'm just trying to get started with a simple example with LLVM under windows. I downloaded the mingw binaries from the website and would like to compile a program. (PS: The mingw binaries did not come with any documentation on what they are and how to use them) I used the online code generator (http://llvm.org/demo/index.cgi) to compile hello world: #include <stdio.h> int main() {