similar to: [LLVMdev] committing with the git mirror

Good evening, Jay! ...Instructions, ... 1. git clone http://llvm.org/git/XXX.git (assume it "origin") 2. Create git authors file (assume /path/to/file/of/authors) with single line. foad = Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> Oh yeah, you should define your name and mailto same as described in llvm.org/git with case-sensitive. 3. Edit .git/config manually :p [svn]

My git-svn fu is not very strong. In the course of preparing a set of AVX patches, I've committed several changes to my local LLVM git clone. I don't want to send all of those changes upstream right away. What's the best way to send just the first of those changes us using git-svn? dcommit appears to send all pending changes. Is there a way of branching/cherry-picking that will

Dave, bty, don't you work on your branches, but master? I think it would be not "the right git way". ...Takumi ps. for me, to commit much commits; $ git checkout master $ git rebase -i mybranch (pick up commits interactive on master as cherry) $ make -C builddir check-all -j4 $ git svn dcommit -n

On 13 September 2011 15:50, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy at grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: > I guess you have to rebase (pull --rebase or so) your branches. "git > rebase" is relatively smart, and will skip patches that you already have > in your local branch. http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#git_mirror "Since the upstream repository is in Subversion, you should use

On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > It seems given the decent amount of discussions it's time to make > small announcement. > > So, official git mirrors are available for some subset of LLVM > projects. They were used by some LLVM developers for couple of months > already and seem to be stable enough. Thank you for setting

Good morning, Dave. On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:17 AM, David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Do git repositories cloned from git-svn mirrors work properly?  For > example: > >                         svn >                          ^ >                          | >                          | >                          V >                       git-svn

Hello Everyone, It seems given the decent amount of discussions it's time to make small announcement. So, official git mirrors are available for some subset of LLVM projects. They were used by some LLVM developers for couple of months already and seem to be stable enough. Right now there is a mirroring for LLVM itself and clang. More can be added per requests. The mirrors are made via

All, This buildbot is getting lots of assertion failures in the test suite. They were probably caused by my commit: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r151049 | foad | 2012-02-21 09:25:52 +0000 (Tue, 21 Feb 2012) | 6 lines Changed paths: M /llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/LLVMContextImpl.h M /llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Type.cpp PR1210: make uniquing of struct and

Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> writes: > Hello Everyone > > As you might already know, git mirrors of llvm repository started from > repo.or.cz mirrors, where stuff was pushed almost by hands out of > git-svn local copy. Right now we have official and automatically > updated GIT mirrors on llvm.org and thus repo.or.cz mirrors look a bit > redundant.

Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy at grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > dag at cray.com (David A. Greene) writes: > >> Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> writes: >> >>> I believe git has a similar system for maintaining "branches of patches"  >> >> A pointer/tutorial on how to do this would be most welcome. > > It depends on the definition of

I'm trying to cross-compile LLVM with build=, host=target=. I'm using the following packages from Debian lenny: mingw32 4.2.1.dfsg-1 mingw32-binutils 2.18.50-20080109-1 mingw32-runtime 3.13-1 The first problem I hit was when I configured with CC, CXX, AR and RANLIB set to mingw cross-tools, but forgot to specify NM as well. This resulted in a load of warnings that scrolled off the

I've always found the name ComputeMaskedBits a bit unintuitive, and since r154011 it's even worse because there is no masking going on whatsoever: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120402/140280.html Is there any appetite for a global rename to ComputeKnownBits? Or any other better names? Thanks, Jay.

Hello Everyone As you might already know, git mirrors of llvm repository started from repo.or.cz mirrors, where stuff was pushed almost by hands out of git-svn local copy. Right now we have official and automatically updated GIT mirrors on llvm.org and thus repo.or.cz mirrors look a bit redundant. However, they might still be useful, but definitely not within the current "push mode". It

On 08/05/2010 01:45 AM, David Greene wrote: > Do pushes to the LLVM git mirror get forwarded to the svn trunk > automatically? For various reasons it may be more convenient > for me to work on LLVM through git but I don't want to go through > a lot of pain to send patches to trunk via git. It should be > easy. > > Does anyone do their primary development via the git

Hi, I've just tried to run the test-suite, for the first time in ages. It stops rather abruptly with: $ make TEST=nightly report report.html /home/jay/llvm/local/bin/llvm-gcc -I/home/jay/llvm/gitobjdir/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests -I/home/jay/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk/SingleSource/UnitTests -I/home/jay/git/llvm/projects/test-suite/include -I../../include

(Resending with the correct mailing list address.) Hi, Currently test/asan/TestCases/alloca_vla_interact.cc is XFAILed for powerpc64. I've had a look at why it doesn't work. I think the only problem is in the call to __asan_allocas_unpoison that is inserted at the end of the "for" loop (just before a stackrestore instruction). The call function is created something like this

On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote: >> To test clang: >> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source. > > LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get: > Does TOT build? If not, please file a bug. Unfortunately Cygwin is not in our release criteria. I'd like to have a buildbot running (if there is not one already) and then get someone to qualify it for the

On 13 February 2012 09:22, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > Would it be possible to use CityHash instead for strings? > > http://code.google.com/p/cityhash/ Incidentally there was talk of using CityHash for LLVM's StringMap last year, but I don't think it ever came to anything: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-April/014656.html Jay.

The following bugs look like they only relate to llvm-gcc. Can they be closed, as llvm-gcc is no longer supported? http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3636 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5011 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6764 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8451 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9310 http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9311

How about tweaking the compiler-rt cmakefiles so that if lsan is not supported, the target check-lsan still exists but does nothing? I've attached a patch that does this. (I don't know much about cmake so there might be a better way of doing it.) Alternatively, can I change the zorg build script so that "run sanitizer tests in gcc build" doesn't try to run check-lsan etc