similar to: [LLVMdev] Phase Interactions

On 19 June 2011 14:44, Suresh Purini <suresh.purini at gmail.com> wrote: >  I am doing few experiments to do understand optimization phase > interactions. Here is a brief description of my experiements. > > 1. I picked the list of machine independent optimizations acting on > llvm IR (those that are enabled at O3). > 2.  for each optimzation in the optimization-list >  

Dear all, I have a function that predicts DV based on one predictor pred: pred<-c(0,3000000,7800000,15600000,23400000,131200000) DV<-c(0,500,1000,1400,1700,1900) ## I define Function 1 that computes the predicted value based on pred values and parameters a and b: calc_DV_pred <- function(a,b) { DV_pred <- rep(0,(length(pred))) for(i in 1:length(DV_pred)){ DV_pred[i] <- a *

Hello, I am working on finding good optimization sequences for a given program (phase ordering problem). I have the following setup. 1) The source programs are translated into LLVM IR using -O0 + -scalarrepl. 2) Find an optimization sequence using some strategy which translates the IR generated in the previous step into another IR. 3) Apply llc -O2 and map the IR in to target assembly code.

Hello, At the boot prompt ALLOWOPTIONS 0 is only applied to implicit kernels and not to labels. For configuration which want to allow selection, but prevent customization of the kernel command line, this behaviour is bad. Also the IMPLICIT 0 is applied to both the boot prompt and configuration setting (like DEFAULT); but one could argue that only the command supplied at the prompt make sense to

Hi, trying to install a package containing C code and requiring non-default configure argument settings the incantation (this has worked for R <= 2.8.1 on the same architectures) R CMD INSTALL --configure-args="--with-opt1 --with-opt2" packname does always result in a warning Warning: unknown option '--with-opt2' and consequently the option is ignored. Reverting the order

> I'll be happy to answer any further questions you may have, feel free to e-mail > me directly (though right now our mail server is down) > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: 1. llvm-ld will be used as "The Optimizer". 2. If the user has specified to generate the final executable, then llvm-ld should run on all the .bc files generated by clang

Full_Name: Karsten Krug Version: 2.4.0 OS: Open Suse 10.0, Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (88.134.13.50) I found a problem in the 'optimise' function for one dimensional optimisation. Example 1: Try to find a maximum of the function below with the use of 'optimise' in the interval [0,0.5]. The function follows a parabola and has two local maxima located at the margins of

Hi, I'm using LLVM 1.8 with the GCC4-frontend on a Slackware 10.2 box (GCC 3.3.6). When issuing the following command (line 14 in a script called manual.sh): llvm-ld -O1 *.trans -L${SOME_LIB_DIR} -L${SOME_OTHER_LIB_DIR} -L${LLVM_FRONT}/lib -lSOME_LIB -lSOME_OTHER_LIB -load=${MY_LIB_DIR}/opt1.so -load=${MY_LIB_DIR}/opt2.so -debug-pass=Details -debug -o test ... I get the following

Hi Sanjiv, Sanjiv Gupta <sanjiv.gupta <at> microchip.com> writes: > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: > [...] As promised, I've implemented a basic compiler driver for the PIC16 toolchain. It's under tools/llvmc/examples/mcc16. Some examples illustrating the features you requested: > 2. If the user has specified to generate the final

Hi Zide, I think I found the right way to reach my goal. I used the following command: clang -O3 -Xclang -disable-llvm-optzns main.c -S -emit-llvm -o main.ll to generate an IR file enriched by all the metadata that otherwise wouldn't be generated with -O0. Moreover, -disable-llvm-optzns flag ensures that none of the optimization passes has been applied yet to the IR. In this way, I can

Hi Sanjiv, Sanjiv Gupta <sanjiv.gupta <at> microchip.com> writes: > > PIC16 now has clang and llc based system to generate native assembly. We > then use our native assembler (gpasm) and the native linker (mplink) to > generate the final executable. How can I integrate these things with > the driver llvmc to have gcc like user experience? Note that we also >

PIC16 now has clang and llc based system to generate native assembly. We then use our native assembler (gpasm) and the native linker (mplink) to generate the final executable. How can I integrate these things with the driver llvmc to have gcc like user experience? Note that we also want to run llvm-ld in order to perform the LTOs in case of multiple files. - Sanjiv

Devang, I meant as an end user. -Suresh On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > Suresh, > > > On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Suresh Purini wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> What is the default loop-unroll factor in llvm? How can we specify >> our own unroll-factor? > > Here "we" means end user or a

Dear all, What is the default loop-unroll factor in llvm? How can we specify our own unroll-factor? -Suresh

In a previous post (included at the end of the message), Reid stated that in August 2006, llvm-ld did not support native libraries. I have a few questions about that. Is it still true that llvm does not support native libraries? Furthermore, what exactly is meant by that? In particular, I have bytecode that I want to turn into a native executable and it needs to be linked against a dynamic

Hello, When we invoke the loop-unroll pass, the compiler is crashing. From the earlier posts in the mailing-list and from the bug reports, it is a known problem. Is there some one working on this bug? -Suresh

Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > > Hi Sanjiv, > > Sanjiv Gupta <sanjiv.gupta <at> microchip.com> writes: > > > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: > > [...] > > As promised, I've implemented a basic compiler driver for the > PIC16 toolchain. It's under tools/llvmc/examples/mcc16. > Hi Mikhail, How do you build mcc16

Hello, I tried to do some small experiments on the loop unroll transformation. Following is the Test Program. I compiled it as follows: $ opt -loop-rotate -debug-only=loop-unroll -loop-unroll -unroll-count=2 test1.o -S -o test1.s ------------------ int a[1024]; int main() { int i, sum=0; for(i=0; i<1024; ++i) sum += a[i]; printf("%d",sum); } ------------------- I got

Hello, How can I convert Fortran Programs to llvm IR? Can I use dragonegg to generate an llvm IR and then use rest of the llvm tool set as it is? -Suresh

Hi Bram, Comments inline .. On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 18:01 +0200, Bram Adams wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using LLVM 1.8 with the GCC4-frontend on a Slackware 10.2 box (GCC > 3.3.6). When issuing the following command (line 14 in a script called > manual.sh): > > llvm-ld -O1 *.trans -L${SOME_LIB_DIR} -L${SOME_OTHER_LIB_DIR} -L > ${LLVM_FRONT}/lib -lSOME_LIB -lSOME_OTHER_LIB