similar to: [LLVMdev] Solaris 11 (i386) build fails

Hi, Can I build llvm with gcc 3.4.2 !!!! I'm getting the following error when I trying to build llvm 2.5 and also 2.4 make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/remote/users/hsenussi/edifact/llvm-2.4/ lib/Transforms/IPO' make[3]: Entering directory `/remote/users/hsenussi/edifact/llvm-2.4/ lib/Transforms/Hello' llvm[3]: Linking Release Loadable

Hi, I am following the instructions on Writing an LLVM Pass on Darwin(8.7.0) powerpc. The loadable library is built. But "opt -load " gives error saying "Symbol not found". I am using LLVM 1.8. Could someone tell me how to fix it? I have tried the same procedure on Pentium4 Redhat9. Everything is ok there. So I think there must be some specific problem on Darwin that I should

When I build LLVM, the message LLVMHello ignored -- Loadable modules not supported on this platform is shown and the LLVM Hello pass doesn't work. I am using Windows. Is this correct? LLVM Hello pass works only on Linux? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi there, I have a question on my linux box where I cant link properly. I've tried configure option --enable-shared or --disable-shared. The following are the message I got. Is there anything I can do to fix this linking/lib problem? thanks in advance, Tim ps. make[3]: Entering directory `/remote/dept5428a/clientstore/timoshiu/timoshiu_esp_main_llvm/obj/lib/Transforms/Hello' llvm[3]:

Hi ! The Hello world pass sources are in llvm/lib/Transform/Hello/* If you compile llvm, the Hello library will be compiled too. It's not installed but it's in build_directory/Debug/lib/LLVMHello.so (or in build_directory/Release/lib/LLVMHello.so) Olivier. On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:35 AM, kalyan ponnala <ponnala.kalyan at gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, > > I was going

> If you compile llvm, the Hello library will be compiled too. It's not > installed but it's in build_directory/Debug/lib/LLVMHello.so (or in > build_directory/Release/lib/LLVMHello.so) Loadable passes are not supported on windows due to lack of OS dynamic linking support (and I doubt they will be supported ever). -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics

On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 21:57 -0500, Jing Yu wrote: > Hi, > Hi Jing, > I am following the instructions on Writing an LLVM Pass on > Darwin(8.7.0) powerpc. The loadable library is built. But "opt -load > " gives error saying "Symbol not found". I am using LLVM 1.8. Could > someone tell me how to fix it? I have tried the same procedure on > Pentium4 Redhat9.

I've built LLVM/Clang from svn under Cygwin on Windows 7. I'd like to build on the LLVMHello pass example, however, when I try: $ cd $LLVM/lib/Transforms/Hello $ make I receive a large number of errors which start with: llvm[0]: Linking Debug+Asserts Loadable Module LLVMHello.dll /cygdrive/c/Users/Graham/home/projects/llvm_cygwin/lib/Transforms/Hello/Debug+Asserts/Hello.o: In function

Hi! I was trying to run an already build LLVM-pass ( the Hello world ) on Visual Studio. I could locate the The Hello world pass sources in llvm/lib/Transform/Hello/*.But when I compiled llvm using the command "cmake -G "Visual Studio 10" ..\llvm" , I couldn't find the LLVMHello.so file in "build_directory/Debug/lib/LLVMHello.so" neither in

Thanks a lot for the reply guys. So, does that mean that I cant write my own passes if I work on Windows side of the LLVM? Is there any other way to use a new pass. How are windows users supposed to work? Thanks again. On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info > wrote: > > If you compile llvm, the Hello library will be compiled too. It's

I was able to process further by making some code changes and replacing export-dynamic with -bexpfull in Makefile.config. Now, i am getting following error while linking .. llvm[3]: Linking Release+Asserts Loadable Module LLVMHello.so ld: 0706-027 The -R $ORIGIN flag is ignored. ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: llvm::Pass::getPassName() const ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol:

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value >> >> of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if >> >> that's

Hello, I was going through the LLVM docs "writing an LLVM Pass". Can someone tell me how to create the Hello.so file as it is said in the document. It talks about compiling the Hello pass using gmake. I am a Windows user (windows 7, cmake, visual studio 9 2008). I cant use cmake here as this hello pass has links to the llvm's solution file, I mean It uses some of the header files

Hello, I am currently working with the implementation of CFL Andersen algorithmand I am trying to do some improvements to the Andersen algorithm. I would like to create loadable module .so and run clang with my e.g. "cfl-anders-improved.so" to avoid the "long" way - generating IR, running opt with my improved algorithm to generate optimalized code and then building it. Is a

Hello, I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it. I'm working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin: gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) Is LLVM supposed to work with this version of GCC (probably using the -mno-cygwin option to get a Mingw-like behavior)? The LLVM source tree is from the current SVN trunk. Compilation

I have followed http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html, used the latest release gdb-7.1 (from March 18, 2010) and got this stack: (gdb) bt #0 0x35532156 in ?? () #1 0x355320f8 in ?? () #2 0x35532098 in ?? () #3 0x3553202e in ?? () #4 0x34a5661a in ?? () #5 0x349d9bd9 in ?? () #6 0x08052cd9 in main (argc=4, argv=0xbfbfe264, envp=0xbfbfe278) at

On 02/02/2011 19:53, Lally Singh wrote: > To answer my own question. The problem is that Solaris ships with > very old tools, and llvmc was generating assembler that worked with a > fresh (gcc-4.5) compile& install. I had them handy, just further > down the path. Hopefully anyone with the same problem can find this > in the archive. > I think llvm isn't ported to

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value > >> of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if > >> that's erroneously false. > > This works for me: > > Index: Makefile.rules >

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com> wrote: > I have followed http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html, used the > latest release gdb-7.1 (from March 18, 2010) and got this stack: > > (gdb) bt > #0  0x35532156 in ?? () > #1  0x355320f8 in ?? () > #2  0x35532098 in ?? () > #3  0x3553202e in ?? () > #4  0x34a5661a in ?? () > #5  0x349d9bd9

Hi All, I am trying to build llvm on AIX. I installed all the required packages including gcc, g++, etc ./configure also went fine. but i tried to run gmake, i got the following error: llvm[1]: Compiling MemoryBuffer.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[1]: Compiling MemoryObject.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[1]: Compiling Mutex.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[1]: Compiling Path.cpp for