similar to: [LLVMdev] How to bootstrap a bitcode file?

Hi all. I'm a bit of a newbie with wine, so please excuse me if I've messed up somewhere. I'm trying to install msxml3 installed, so I've tried using winetricks thus: sh winetricks -v msxml3 This gives: ... + echo Executing wine msiexec /i /home/nonroot/.winetrickscache/msxml3.msi Executing wine msiexec /i /home/nonroot/.winetrickscache/msxml3.msi + wine msiexec /i

I am new to samba and I have two questions. I have a linux box connected to a box running windows 98. Windows is set to share-level access control. 1. How do I allow nonroot users to "smbmount"? 2. When I mount a share as root, root has full access to the share, however, a nonroot user has read-only access. How do I allow a regular user to have full access to a share? Thanks

Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 14:02 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > - ability to check out llvm-gcc or update llvm-gcc and build it before > running tests. In addition to using a prebuilt binary. Does it need a prebuilt binary? I have been suspecting so since it has been failing with BUILD ERROR for me. I just haven't found the time to verify that yet. I have yet to try building

Am 30.09.2010 00:34, schrieb Chris Lattner: > > The format is literally a bitstream, not a bytestream. See this document for more details: > http://llvm.org/docs/BitCodeFormat.html Ah... something I always meant to ask: How does the LLVM infrastructure deal with the added overhead of packing/unpacking a bitstream? Ignore it since modern CPUs can deal with that? Some ingenious

Hello I have been solving a problem how to make a nonroot user able to administer the domain (add users, groups, modify them etc.) from Windows workstation using usrmgr.exe It looks like what is stated in Samba HOWTO collection as prerequisites is not enough. First I found Chapter 12 cxl "How to make Samba PDC users member of the Domain Admins group" - made the nonroot user member of

On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 14:02 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> - ability to check out llvm-gcc or update llvm-gcc and build it >> before >> running tests. In addition to using a prebuilt binary. > > Does it need a prebuilt binary? > I have been suspecting so since it has been failing with BUILD ERROR

On 2015-03-23, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote: > > For future reference -L is a big hammer. If you use it without > explicitly attempting a read-write mount (which a read only mount at > boot time will not do because it's an ro mount by default) ...for the root filesystem, anyway. For nonroot filesystems it should use whatever flags are set in fstab.

Hello! A good day to you all. i'm trying to get samba 2.2.4 to work with w2k pro boxes, and i noticed that only the root smb account can be used to add the machine to the domain(the machine account had been created in advance). When i tried to use an account that is not root, but part of the domain admin group, it returns various errors, like "unknown user name or bad

Hi A security update for samba 3.0.1 - 3.0.22 was posted on samba.org on the 10th July. Does anyone know how to apply to update? Everytime I click on the download link I just get the following text Index: source/smbd/service.c =================================================================== --- source/smbd/service.c (revision 16676) +++ source/smbd/service.c

...we are running a samba-2.0.6 server on a Sun E3000, to provide file and print service (but not logon service) to users on PCs. It works fine except for an enormously annoying problem: ordinary (nonroot) users are not able to change their own samba passwd. When a user invokes smbpasswd he or she gets the following response: euler$ /usr/local/samba/bin/smbpasswd Old SMB password: New SMB

Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > > > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > >>> Look at how $LLVM_CONFIGURE is built, the final value is > >>> > >>>

On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: >> >>> >>> Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >>>> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: >>>>> Look at how

Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 00:02 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > >> > >>> OK, I now have > >>> > >>> LLVM_VERSION_INFO=kurier-bootstrap

It shoudl work fine if you set CC right and use --build --target --host == i686-pc-linux-gnu On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I managed to navigate around all those issues with environment variables > and such. llvm itself now builds and checks just fine, but I can't get > llvm-gcc to compile. > >

On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: >>> Look at how $LLVM_CONFIGURE is built, the final value is >>> >>> --prefix=/home/jo --enable-optimized --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu >>> --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu

*bump* Anybody got a clue? I can post a full transcript of a shell session that reproduces the error if that helps. To reiterate the original problem: I'm trying to compile LLVM-GCC on an Ubuntu 64-bit box, with a 32-bit target (to avoid potential problems with PIC and such). I get errors like Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' as soon as the make process tries to assemble

I asked a couple of months ago in r-sig-fedora about a difference I noticed between Ubuntu and RedHat/Fedora. Now I think I've figured out the cause is a little issue in packaging but I don't know how to get it fixed. On Ubuntu, the setup is like this. It i is controlled in a file called Renviron R packages built/distributed in RPM are installed to /usr/lib/R/library. R packages built

It seems to be the time of the year for top 10 lists both looking backwards (e.g. films: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3660638/ ) and forwards (e.g. trends: http://www.wfs.org/forecasts.htm ) In this light I think we need a list of the top 10 features that users think R needs. Some of these are concrete while others are vague. By R, I am referring to the entire R system including packages, not

The new MCJIT is module-oriented, like a classic compiler+linker (which it is) while the old JIT is function-oriented. If I understand correctly, the main problems with the old JIT were the duplication of the debug information code and EH code (both gone now). Moreover, if we ignore the lazy evaluation mechanism then the current JIT is actually quite simple module. Would it be possible to keep

To clarify, configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu I do this all the time on my 4 core amd64 box and it works fine. On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > It shoudl work fine if you set CC right and use --build --target > > --host == i686-pc-linux-gnu > > > > On Sun, Mar 30,